Suppr超能文献

使用传统恐惧测试评估牛的不同情绪回路。

The Use of Traditional Fear Tests to Evaluate Different Emotional Circuits in Cattle.

作者信息

Daigle Courtney Lynd, Hubbard Amanda J, Grandin Temple

机构信息

Animal Behavior & Welfare Laboratory, Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University;

Animal Behavior & Welfare Laboratory, Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University.

出版信息

J Vis Exp. 2020 Apr 22(158). doi: 10.3791/60641.

Abstract

Animal temperament is complex and has implications for productivity and economic profitability. Quantifying an animal's response to differing stimuli may facilitate breeding selections and identify animals that are better suited to specific management strategies. Multiple tests have been developed to evaluate cattle temperament (e.g., exit velocity, chute score, pen score, open field test, startle test, bovine zero maze), but each of these tests evaluates the animal's response to different stimuli (e.g., isolation, novel environment, startle, willingness to enter an enclosed area). Cattle temperament has been observed to be relatively stable over time. However, the evaluation of temperament has the potential to be influenced by current conditions, previous experiences, and observer bias. Many of these temperament tests have been improperly categorized as fear tests and have also been criticized for being subjective. This paper provides a framework for standardizing behavioral tests for cattle and suggests that these different evaluations assess different aspects of the animal's overall temperament.

摘要

动物的性情复杂,对生产力和经济收益有影响。量化动物对不同刺激的反应可能有助于育种选择,并识别出更适合特定管理策略的动物。已开发出多种测试来评估牛的性情(例如,出栏速度、通道评分、围栏评分、旷场试验、惊吓试验、牛零迷宫),但这些测试中的每一种都评估动物对不同刺激的反应(例如,隔离、新环境、惊吓、进入封闭区域的意愿)。据观察,牛的性情随时间相对稳定。然而,性情评估有可能受到当前状况、以往经历和观察者偏差的影响。这些性情测试中的许多都被不恰当地归类为恐惧测试,也因主观性而受到批评。本文提供了一个标准化牛行为测试的框架,并表明这些不同的评估评估了动物整体性情的不同方面。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验