• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估生态系统服务的社会价值,以实现城市社区弹性河岸带绿色通道规划和管理。

Assessing the Social Value of Ecosystem Services for Resilient Riparian Greenway Planning and Management in an Urban Community.

机构信息

Department of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Sanghuh College of Life Sciences, Konkuk University, 225 Life Sciences Building, Seoul 05029, Korea.

Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, 2140 Plant Sciences Building, College Park, MD 20742, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 7;17(9):3261. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093261.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17093261
PMID:32392828
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7246528/
Abstract

Ecosystem services depend on the interrelation between people and the environment, and people are increasingly recognizing the social value of ecosystem services. Based on humans needs related to the values of ecosystem services, riparian greenways, properly planned and managed for resiliency, could provide great opportunities for social ecological change and transformation toward sustainability. We focus on the ecosystem service values of such greenways based on resilience in urban communities. The purpose of this study is to assess the social value of ecosystem services for resilient riparian greenway planning and management based on a survey of residents living near the Yangjaecheon riparian greenway in Gwacheon, South Korea. First, cluster analysis was performed with data from 485 completed surveys to identify different groups of respondents. Importance-performance analysis (IPA) was then applied to develop planning and management guidance for the riparian greenway based on group characteristics. Two distinct groups were identified: the Strong Social Value of Ecosystem Services group and the Neutral Social Value of Ecosystem Services group. Different distributions were found between the two groups based on gender and residency period, and significant differences were also found for age and familiarity with the riparian greenway. The results show what each group perceived to be important and how well the riparian greenway met their expectations regarding ecosystem services. These results indicate the perceived value of ecosystem services on the basis of the group characteristics, helping establish the direction for resilient riparian greenway planning and management approaches.

摘要

生态系统服务取决于人与环境的相互关系,人们越来越认识到生态系统服务的社会价值。基于人类与生态系统服务价值相关的需求,适当规划和管理具有弹性的河岸绿道,可为社会生态变革和可持续性转型提供巨大机会。我们关注基于城市社区弹性的此类绿道的生态系统服务价值。本研究旨在评估基于韩国果川市阳嘉川河岸绿道附近居民调查的生态系统服务的社会价值,为弹性河岸绿道规划和管理提供参考。首先,对 485 份完成的调查问卷进行聚类分析,以识别不同的受访者群体。然后应用重要性-绩效分析(IPA)根据群体特征为河岸绿道制定规划和管理指南。确定了两个不同的群体:生态系统服务强社会价值群体和生态系统服务弱社会价值中性群体。根据性别和居住时间,两个群体之间存在不同的分布,年龄和对河岸绿道的熟悉程度也存在显著差异。结果表明了每个群体对生态系统服务的重要性的看法,以及河岸绿道在多大程度上满足了他们的期望。这些结果基于群体特征表明了对生态系统服务的感知价值,有助于确定弹性河岸绿道规划和管理方法的方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c58a/7246528/0fd010485637/ijerph-17-03261-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c58a/7246528/82537b4677d2/ijerph-17-03261-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c58a/7246528/81ad99aee188/ijerph-17-03261-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c58a/7246528/0fd010485637/ijerph-17-03261-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c58a/7246528/82537b4677d2/ijerph-17-03261-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c58a/7246528/81ad99aee188/ijerph-17-03261-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c58a/7246528/0fd010485637/ijerph-17-03261-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the Social Value of Ecosystem Services for Resilient Riparian Greenway Planning and Management in an Urban Community.评估生态系统服务的社会价值,以实现城市社区弹性河岸带绿色通道规划和管理。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 7;17(9):3261. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093261.
2
Increasing the Use of Urban Greenways in Developing Countries: A Case Study on Wutong Greenway in Shenzhen, China.增加发展中国家城市绿道的使用:以中国深圳梧桐绿道为例
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 May 23;14(6):554. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14060554.
3
Riverside Greenway in Urban Environment: Residents' Perception and Use of Greenways along the Huangpu River in Shanghai, China.城市环境中的滨江绿道:中国上海黄浦江滨绿道的居民感知与使用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 27;18(3):1120. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031120.
4
Hedgerow typology and condition analysis to inform greenway design in rural landscapes.树篱类型学与状况分析,助力乡村景观绿道设计。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Oct 1;247:790-803. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.116. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
5
Value orientation and payment for ecosystem services: Perceived detrimental consequences lead to willingness-to-pay for ecosystem services.价值取向与生态系统服务付费:感知到的不利后果导致人们愿意为生态系统服务付费。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Jan 15;206:458-471. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.059. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
6
Impact of perceived importance of ecosystem services and stated financial constraints on willingness to pay for riparian meadow restoration in Flanders (Belgium).对生态系统服务重要性的认知以及既定财务限制对佛兰德(比利时)河岸草甸恢复支付意愿的影响。
Environ Manage. 2014 Aug;54(2):346-59. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0293-z. Epub 2014 May 20.
7
Investigating the physical activity, health, wellbeing, social and environmental effects of a new urban greenway: a natural experiment (the PARC study).调查新城市绿道对身体活动、健康、福利、社会和环境的影响:一项自然实验(PARC 研究)。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Oct 30;18(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01213-9.
8
A new framework for dynamic visual landscape quality evaluation of greenways based on perceived sensory dimensions: A case study of Chengdu urban greenway.基于感知感官维度的绿道动态视觉景观质量评价新框架:以成都城市绿道为例
J Environ Manage. 2024 Nov;370:122950. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122950. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
9
A spatial approach to climate-resilient infrastructure in coastal social-ecological systems: The case of dumbeong in Goseong County, South Korea.沿海社会-生态系统中具有气候韧性的基础设施的空间方法:以韩国高城郡 dumbeong 为例。
Environ Int. 2019 Oct;131:105032. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105032. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
10
Understanding the barriers and facilitators of urban greenway use among older and disadvantaged adults: A mixed-methods study in Québec city.理解老年人和弱势群体使用城市绿道的障碍和促进因素:魁北克市的一项混合方法研究。
Health Place. 2024 Sep;89:103340. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103340. Epub 2024 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Considering Farmers' Heterogeneity to Payment Ecosystem Services Participation: A Choice Experiment and Agent-Based Model Analysis in Xin'an River Basin, China.考虑农民对支付生态系统服务参与的异质性:以中国新安河流域为例的选择实验和基于主体模型分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 11;19(12):7190. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127190.
2
What Is the Effect of Cultural Greenway Projects in High-Density Urban Municipalities? Assessing the Public Living Desire near the Cultural Greenway in Central Beijing.高密度城市市区的文化绿道项目有何影响?评估北京市中心文化绿道附近的公众生活意愿。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 14;19(4):2147. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042147.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Urban ecosystem services for resilience planning and management in New York City.纽约市弹性规划和管理的城市生态系统服务。
Ambio. 2014 May;43(4):502-15. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0509-8.
2
Biodiversity, ecosystem functions and services in environmental risk assessment: introduction to the special issue.生物多样性、生态系统功能和服务在环境风险评估中的作用:特刊介绍。
Sci Total Environ. 2012 Jan 15;415:1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.08.012. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
3
Integrating social marketing into sustainable resource management at Padre Island National Seashore: an attitude-based segmentation approach.
Riverside Greenway in Urban Environment: Residents' Perception and Use of Greenways along the Huangpu River in Shanghai, China.
城市环境中的滨江绿道:中国上海黄浦江滨绿道的居民感知与使用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 27;18(3):1120. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031120.
4
Eutrophication and the Ecological Health Risk.富营养化与生态健康风险。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 31;17(17):6332. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176332.
将社会营销融入帕德雷岛国家海滨的可持续资源管理:一种基于态度的细分方法。
Environ Manage. 2009 Jun;43(6):985-98. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9293-9. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
4
An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation.一种将生态系统服务纳入实施主流的运作模式。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 15;105(28):9483-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706559105. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
5
Conservation planning for ecosystem services.生态系统服务的保护规划。
PLoS Biol. 2006 Oct;4(11):e379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040379.
6
Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems.为增强社会生态系统的恢复力而进行的适应性共同管理。
Environ Manage. 2004 Jul;34(1):75-90. doi: 10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7. Epub 2004 Jun 23.
7
Public support for ecosystem restoration in the Hudson River Valley, USA.美国哈德逊河谷地区对生态系统恢复的公众支持。
Environ Manage. 2002 Apr;29(4):467-76. doi: 10.1007/s00267-001-0033-z.
8
Psychology and the science of human-environment interactions.心理学与人类-环境互动科学。
Am Psychol. 2000 May;55(5):523-30.