Peng H Y, Chen F Y, Dang R, Zuo Y L, Hu P D, Yang Y Y, Zhou R, Rong X, Chen D H
Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center (Children's Hospital), Guangzhou 510120, China.
State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2020 May 2;58(5):392-397. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20191111-00713.
To explore the efficacy and safety of high-titer plasma in the treatment of pediatric patients with severe adenovirus pneumonia. The clinical data of 92 pediatric patients with severe adenovirus pneumonia admitted to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center from January 2016 to October 2019 were retrospectively collected. According to the treatment with or without high-titer plasma, the patients were divided into plasma treatment group (41) and non-plasma treatment group (51). The 51 patients with chest radiograph showing more than half the lungs involved were divided into plasma treatment group (29) and non-plasma treatment group (22). According to fever duration before plasma treatment, patients were divided into early group (≤5 days, 5), middle group (>5-10 days, 14), and late group (>10 days, 22). Baseline data, therapeutic effects, and prognosis of patients in each group were analyzed with test, non-parametric rank sum test, one-way ANOVA and chi-square test. Ninety-two patients were included. There were no significant differences in age, gender, body weight, fever duration, sequential organ failure assessment, and Murray lung injury score between plasma treatment group and non-plasma treatment group before admission (all 0.05). The proportion of patients whose temperature drop to normal within 5 days was higher in plasma treatment group than that in non-plasma treatment group (88% (36/41) 69% (35/51), χ(2)=4.745, 0.029). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the proportions of invasive ventilator weaning within 14 days (63% (26/41) . 76% (39/51), χ(2)=1.868, 0.172), transfer out from PICU within 14 days (49% (20/41) . 69% (35/51), χ(2)=3.724, 0.054), discharge within 28 days (51% (21/41) . 61%(31/51), χ(2)=0.846, 0.358) and survived patients (85% (35/41) . 76%(39/51), χ(2)=1.143, 0.285). Among patients with severe chest radiograph, the proportions of patients whose temperature drop to normal within 5 days and survived patients were higher in plasma treatment group than those in non-plasma treatment group (86% (25/29) . 59% (13/22), χ(2)=4.843, 0.028; 83% (24/29) . 55%(12/22), χ(2)=4.796, 0.029, respectively). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the proportions of invasive ventilator weaning within 14 days (52% (15/29) . 59% (13/22), χ(2)=0.274, 0.601), transfer out from PICU within 14 days (34% (10/29) . 45% (10/22), χ(2)=0.632, 0.427), and discharge within 28 days (45% (13/29) . 45% (10/22), χ(2)=0.002, 0.964). Among early, middle and late group, the proportions of invasive ventilator weaning within 14 days were 2/5, 13/14 and 50% (11/22), respectively, with statistically significant difference (χ(2)=8.119, 0.017). There were no significant differences in the proportions of patients whose temperature drop to normal within 5 days (4/5, 14/14, 82% (18/22), χ(2)=2.965, 0.227), transfer out from PICU within 14 days (2/5, 10/14, 36%(8/22), χ(2)=4.386, 0.112), discharge within 28 days (2/5, 8/14, 50% (11/22), χ(2)=0.462, 0.794) and survived patients (4/5, 13/14, 82% (18/22), χ(2)=0.966, 0.617) in the three groups. Only one case with high-titer plasma therapy had rash in the course of infusing plasma and no other adverse reactions were observed. High-titer plasma can shorten the fever time and improve the proportion of survival patients in pediatric severe adenovirus pneumonia. The clinical effect of high-titer plasma is better in 5-10 days of fever course. High-titer plasma is an effective and safe treatment.
探讨高滴度血浆治疗小儿重症腺病毒肺炎的疗效及安全性。回顾性收集2016年1月至2019年10月广州市妇女儿童医疗中心儿科重症监护病房(PICU)收治的92例小儿重症腺病毒肺炎患者的临床资料。根据是否采用高滴度血浆治疗,将患者分为血浆治疗组(41例)和非血浆治疗组(51例)。将胸部X线片显示肺部受累超过一半的51例患者分为血浆治疗组(29例)和非血浆治疗组(22例)。根据血浆治疗前发热持续时间,将患者分为早期组(≤5天,5例)、中期组(>5 - 10天,14例)和晚期组(>10天,22例)。采用t检验、非参数秩和检验、单因素方差分析和卡方检验分析各组患者的基线资料、治疗效果及预后。纳入92例患者。血浆治疗组和非血浆治疗组入院前在年龄、性别、体重、发热持续时间、序贯器官衰竭评估及Murray肺损伤评分方面比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。血浆治疗组体温在5天内降至正常的患者比例高于非血浆治疗组(88%(36/41)对69%(35/51),χ²=4.745,P=0.029)。然而,两组在14天内有创呼吸机撤机比例(63%(26/41)对76%(39/51),χ²=1.868,P= .172)、14天内转出PICU比例(49%(20/41)对69%(35/51),χ²=3.724,P=0.054)、28天内出院比例(51%(21/41)对61%(31/51),χ²=0.846,P=0.358)及存活患者比例(85%(35/41)对76%(39/51),χ²=1.143,P=0.285)比较,差异均无统计学意义。在胸部X线片表现严重的患者中,血浆治疗组体温在5天内降至正常的患者比例及存活患者比例高于非血浆治疗组(分别为86%(25/29)对59%(13/22),χ²=4.843,P=0.028;83%(24/29)对55%(12/22),χ²=4.796,P=0.029)。然而,两组在14天内有创呼吸机撤机比例(52%(15/29)对59%(13/22),χ²=0.274,P=0. .1)、14天内转出PICU比例(34%(10/29)对45%(10/22),χ²=0.632,P=0.427)及28天内出院比例(45%(13/29)对45%(10/22),χ²=0.002,P=0.964)比较,差异均无统计学意义。在早期、中期和晚期组中,14天内有创呼吸机撤机比例分别为2/5、13/14和50%(11/22),差异有统计学意义(χ²=8.119,P=0.017)。三组患者体温在5天内降至正常的比例(4/5、14/14、82%(18/22),χ²=2.965,P=0.227)、14天内转出PICU比例(2/5、10/14、36%(8/22),χ²=4.386,P=0.112)、28天内出院比例(2/5、8/14、50%(11/22),χ²=0.462,P=0.794)及存活患者比例(4/5、13/14、82%(18/22),χ²=0.966,P=0.617)比较,差异均无统计学意义。高滴度血浆治疗仅1例在输注血浆过程中出现皮疹,未观察到其他不良反应。高滴度血浆可缩短小儿重症腺病毒肺炎患者的发热时间,提高存活患者比例。发热病程5 - 10天应用高滴度血浆临床效果更佳。高滴度血浆是一种有效且安全的治疗方法。