• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情紧急情况下的伦理:审视资源分配决策。

Ethics in the Covid-19 emergency: Examining rationing decisions.

作者信息

Mahurkar Arnav

机构信息

MSc Student, Health Economics, Policy and Law, Erasmus University Rotterdam, THE NETHERLANDS.

出版信息

Indian J Med Ethics. 2020 Apr-Jun;V(2):168-169. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2020.049.

DOI:10.20529/IJME.2020.049
PMID:32393441
Abstract

Early last month, the Italian Society of Anaesthesia was forced to publish the above guideline (1) for the country's hospitals. Besides the rising cases of infection, the doctors realised that patients required up to 15-20 days of intensive care as the disease progressed (2). In the face of medical resource scarcities, the guideline established that everyone could not be saved from the coronavirus. And a massive death toll ensued.

摘要

上月初,意大利麻醉学会被迫为该国医院发布上述指南(1)。除了感染病例不断增加外,医生们还意识到,随着病情发展,患者需要长达15至20天的重症监护(2)。面对医疗资源短缺的情况,该指南规定,并非每个人都能从新冠病毒中获救。随后便出现了大量死亡病例。

相似文献

1
Ethics in the Covid-19 emergency: Examining rationing decisions.新冠疫情紧急情况下的伦理:审视资源分配决策。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2020 Apr-Jun;V(2):168-169. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2020.049.
2
Medical Ethics and Ventilator Allocation During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间的医学伦理与呼吸机分配
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2020 Jul 16;22(4):20com02687. doi: 10.4088/PCC.20com02687.
3
[Ethical guides, criteria for admission in intensive care, palliative care. Multi-society recommendations for allocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic].[伦理指南、重症监护与姑息治疗的收治标准。多学会关于新冠疫情期间资源分配的建议]
Medicina (B Aires). 2020;80 Suppl 3:45-64.
4
Principled decisions and virtuous care: an ethical assessment of the SIAARTI Guidelines for allocating intensive care resources.有原则的决策和高尚的关怀:对 SIAARTI 重症监护资源分配指南的伦理评估。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Aug;86(8):872-876. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14691-1. Epub 2020 May 28.
5
COVID-19: The Shift From Clinical to Public Health Ethics.新冠疫情:从临床伦理到公共卫生伦理的转变
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2020 Jul/Aug;26(4):306-309. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001204.
6
The Italian NHS: What Lessons to Draw from COVID-19?意大利国民医疗服务体系:从新冠疫情中吸取哪些教训?
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Aug;18(4):463-466. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00594-5.
7
[COVID-19 and the ethical issues of justice and rationing in health care, with particular regard to the Italian experience].[新型冠状病毒肺炎与医疗保健中的正义和资源分配伦理问题,特别是关于意大利的经验]
Orv Hetil. 2020 Nov 8;161(45):1899-1907. doi: 10.1556/650.2020.32043.
8
Ethical considerations for paediatrics during the COVID-19 pandemic: A discussion paper from the Australian Paediatric Clinical Ethics Collaboration.COVID-19大流行期间儿科的伦理考量:澳大利亚儿科临床伦理协作组织的一篇讨论文件
J Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Jun;56(6):847-851. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14946. Epub 2020 May 29.
9
Critical care triaging in the shadow of COVID-19: Ethics considerations.新冠肺炎疫情阴影下的重症监护分诊:伦理考量。
S Afr Med J. 2020 Apr 16;110(5):355-359.
10
All India Ophthalmological Society: Stance on COVID-19 pandemic.全印度眼科协会:关于新冠疫情的立场
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul;68(7):1239-1242. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1887_20.

引用本文的文献

1
Perception of healthcare workers towards ethical aspects of responsiveness of COVID 19 outbreak: A cross-sectional study.医护人员对新冠疫情应对伦理方面的认知:一项横断面研究。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Jan;11(1):60-66. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_72_21. Epub 2022 Jan 31.