• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠肺炎疫情阴影下的重症监护分诊:伦理考量。

Critical care triaging in the shadow of COVID-19: Ethics considerations.

机构信息

Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.

出版信息

S Afr Med J. 2020 Apr 16;110(5):355-359.

PMID:32657716
Abstract

Since the World Health Organization declared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, COVID-19 infection and the associated mortality have increased exponentially, globally. South Africa (SA) is no exception. Concerns abound over whether SA's healthcare system can withstand a demand for care that is disproportionate to current resources, both in the state and private health sectors. While healthcare professionals in SA have become resilient and adept at making difficult decisions in the face of resource limitations, a surge in COVID-19 cases could place a severe strain on the country's critical care services and necessitate unprecedented rationing decisions. This could occur at two critical points: access to ventilation, and withdrawal of intensive care in non- responsive or deteriorating cases. The ethical dimensions of decision-making at both junctures merit urgent consideration.

摘要

自世界卫生组织宣布 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)为国际关注的突发公共卫生事件以来,COVID-19 感染及其相关死亡率在全球呈指数级增长。南非(SA)也不例外。人们普遍担心南非的医疗保健系统是否能够承受与当前资源不成比例的医疗需求,无论是在国家还是私营医疗部门。虽然南非的医疗保健专业人员已经变得有弹性,并擅长在资源有限的情况下做出艰难的决策,但 COVID-19 病例的激增可能会对该国的重症监护服务造成严重压力,并需要做出前所未有的配给决策。这可能发生在两个关键节点:获得通气和在无反应或恶化的情况下撤出重症监护。这两个节点的决策的伦理维度都值得紧急考虑。

相似文献

1
Critical care triaging in the shadow of COVID-19: Ethics considerations.新冠肺炎疫情阴影下的重症监护分诊:伦理考量。
S Afr Med J. 2020 Apr 16;110(5):355-359.
2
Principled decisions and virtuous care: an ethical assessment of the SIAARTI Guidelines for allocating intensive care resources.有原则的决策和高尚的关怀:对 SIAARTI 重症监护资源分配指南的伦理评估。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Aug;86(8):872-876. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14691-1. Epub 2020 May 28.
3
A Framework for Rationing Ventilators and Critical Care Beds During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间呼吸机及重症监护床位分配框架
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1773-1774. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5046.
4
The Toughest Triage - Allocating Ventilators in a Pandemic.最艰难的分诊——在大流行中分配呼吸机
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):1973-1975. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2005689. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
5
[Ethical guides, criteria for admission in intensive care, palliative care. Multi-society recommendations for allocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic].[伦理指南、重症监护与姑息治疗的收治标准。多学会关于新冠疫情期间资源分配的建议]
Medicina (B Aires). 2020;80 Suppl 3:45-64.
6
Medical Ethics and Ventilator Allocation During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间的医学伦理与呼吸机分配
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2020 Jul 16;22(4):20com02687. doi: 10.4088/PCC.20com02687.
7
Prioritisation of ICU treatments for critically ill patients in a COVID-19 pandemic with scarce resources.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,资源匮乏,对重症患者的 ICU 治疗进行优先排序。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2020 Jun;39(3):333-339. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 May 17.
8
Ethical dilemmas in COVID-19 times: how to decide who lives and who dies?新冠疫情时期的伦理困境:如何决定谁生谁死?
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2020 Sep 21;66Suppl 2(Suppl 2):106-111. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.66.S2.106. eCollection 2020.
9
Making ordinary decisions in extraordinary times.于非常时期做平常抉择。
BMJ. 2020 Aug 26;370:m3268. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3268.
10
Allocation of scarce resources during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Jewish ethical perspective.COVID-19 大流行期间稀缺资源的分配:犹太伦理视角。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Jul;46(7):444-446. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106242. Epub 2020 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Responsible application of artificial intelligence in health care.人工智能在医疗保健中的合理应用。
S Afr J Sci. 2023 May-Jun;119(5-6). doi: 10.17159/sajs.2023/14889. Epub 2023 May 30.
2
The impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on the first COVID-19 epidemic wave in South Africa.非药物干预措施对南非首例 COVID-19 疫情的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 5;23(1):1492. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16162-0.
3
Ageism, human rights and ethical aspects of end-of-life care for older people with serious mental illness.
年龄歧视、人权以及患有严重精神疾病的老年人临终关怀的伦理问题。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 28;13:906873. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.906873. eCollection 2022.
4
Critical care during a pandemic -Are we prepared for the ethical dilemma?大流行期间的重症监护——我们是否准备好应对伦理困境?
J Crit Care. 2022 Apr;68:174-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.12.012. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
5
COVID-19 underscores the important role of Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa.新冠疫情凸显了临床伦理委员会在非洲的重要作用。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Sep 25;22(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00696-2.
6
Prioritising 'already-scarce' intensive care unit resources in the midst of COVID-19: a call for regional triage committees in South Africa.在新冠疫情期间优先分配“本就稀缺的”重症监护病房资源:呼吁南非成立地区分诊委员会。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 22;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00596-5.
7
Use of domestic tools to downstage the reconstructive ladder in a patient with severe crush and degloving injury: a case report.使用国产工具降低严重挤压和脱套伤患者的重建等级:1例病例报告
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Sep 12;37:48. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.37.48.23998. eCollection 2020.
8
Social Justice for Public Health: The COVID-19 Response in Portugal.公共卫生的社会正义:葡萄牙对新冠疫情的应对
J Bioeth Inq. 2020 Dec;17(4):669-674. doi: 10.1007/s11673-020-10058-z. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
9
COVID-19, disability and the context of healthcare triage in South Africa: Notes in a time of pandemic.新冠疫情、残疾与南非医疗分诊背景:大流行时期的笔记
Afr J Disabil. 2020 Aug 18;9:766. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v9i0.766. eCollection 2020.
10
What Could "Fair Allocation" during the Covid-19 Crisis Possibly Mean in Sub-Saharan Africa?在撒哈拉以南非洲,“公平分配”在新冠疫情危机中可能意味着什么?
Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 May;50(3):33-35. doi: 10.1002/hast.1129.