Takagi Hiroshi
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Japan.
Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2020 May 4;21:17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2020.04.002. eCollection 2020 Jul.
Recently, some studies showed assessment of the component gap is important for determination of the implant-inserted condition during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We perform the modified gap technique with adjustment of the virtual gap which estimated by computer-aided design (CAD) using navigation system. The purpose of this study was to compare the virtual gap (CAD-gap) with the actual gap after inserting a femoral trial component (Trial-gap), and examine the usefulness of the surgical technique.
The subjects were 35 patients who underwent primary TKA using a navigation system and posterior-stabilized type TKA. The surgical procedure was to produce an extension gap, confirm the flexed CAD-gap on the navigation screen based on CAD data, and plan osteotomy of the femur. After osteotomy, the femoral component was inserted and the gap balance was measured. A tensor was used to adjust and measure the gap balance. Initial alignment, rotation of the femoral component, soft tissue balance in extension, final alignment after fixing all components, and the CAD- and Trial-gaps in both extension and flexion were evaluated.
The mean initial alignment angle, rotation angle of the femoral component, soft tissue balance angle and final alignment angle were 8.1 ± 4.2° varus, 3.5 ± 1.3°external rotation, 2.7 ± 2.5° varus and 0.4 ± 1.4° varus respectively. The mean medial and lateral CAD-gaps in extension were 10.8 ± 2.5 and 13.7 ± 2.5 mm, and the mean medial and lateral CAD-gaps in flexion were 12.2 ± 2.2 and 13.9 ± 2.7 mm. The equivalent Trial-gaps in extension and flexion were 10.5 ± 2.6 and 11.4 ± 3.1 mm, and 12.2 ± 2.5 and 14.4 ± 2.8 mm. The CAD- and Trial-gaps differed significantly only for lateral gaps in extension.
In comparing the CAD-gap and the Trial-gap, only small difference was found in the lateral gap of extension. The other gaps in both extension and flexion were well maintained. We concluded adjustment of the CAD-gap during surgery using a navigation system can be used to adjust the actual component gap especially in the medial side.
最近,一些研究表明,评估组件间隙对于全膝关节置换术(TKA)中确定植入物插入情况很重要。我们采用改良间隙技术,通过使用导航系统对计算机辅助设计(CAD)估算的虚拟间隙进行调整。本研究的目的是比较股骨试验组件插入后的虚拟间隙(CAD间隙)与实际间隙(试验间隙),并检验该手术技术的实用性。
研究对象为35例行初次TKA且使用导航系统及后稳定型TKA的患者。手术步骤为制造伸直间隙,根据CAD数据在导航屏幕上确认屈膝时的CAD间隙,并计划股骨截骨。截骨后,插入股骨组件并测量间隙平衡。使用张力器调整并测量间隙平衡。评估初始对线、股骨组件的旋转、伸直时的软组织平衡、所有组件固定后的最终对线以及伸直和屈膝时的CAD间隙与试验间隙。
初始对线平均角度、股骨组件旋转角度、软组织平衡角度和最终对线平均角度分别为内翻8.1±4.2°、外旋3.5±1.3°、内翻2.7±2.5°和内翻0.4±1.4°。伸直时内侧和外侧CAD间隙的平均值分别为10.8±2.5和13.7±2.5mm,屈膝时内侧和外侧CAD间隙的平均值分别为12.2±2.2和13.9±2.7mm。伸直和屈膝时对应的试验间隙分别为10.5±2.6和11.4±3.1mm,以及12.2±2.5和14.4±2.8mm。CAD间隙与试验间隙仅在伸直时的外侧间隙有显著差异。
比较CAD间隙和试验间隙时,仅在伸直时的外侧间隙发现有微小差异。伸直和屈膝时的其他间隙保持良好。我们得出结论,术中使用导航系统调整CAD间隙可用于调整实际组件间隙,尤其是在内侧。