Suppr超能文献

利奈唑胺常规剂量是否需要进行治疗药物监测?——一项前瞻性观察性研究的经验

Does the conventional dosage of linezolid necessitate therapeutic drug monitoring?-Experience from a prospective observational study.

作者信息

Fang Jie, Chen Congqin, Wu Yan, Zhang Min, Zhang Ying, Shi Guochao, Yao Yijin, Chen Hong, Bian Xiaolan

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200003, China.

Department of Pharmacy, Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361000, China.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2020 Apr;8(7):493. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.207.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objectives of the present prospective observational study conducted in patients receiving conventional dosage of linezolid was to define the pharmacodynamic range of linezolid exposure, to assess the inter-individual variability in linezolid concentrations, and to define if therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of linezolid may be necessary for Chinese population.

METHODS

Patients included in this study underwent linezolid TDM trough concentration ( ) during treatment with a standard regimen in the period between January 2019 and October 2019. Linezolid was analyzed with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method. Logistic regression was used to define the desired range of linezolid Linear regression and univariate logistic regression analysis were carried out to investigate variables associated with inappropriate linezolid plasma exposure.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients who had 153 linezolid assessed were included in the study. Median linezolid was 3.43 mg/L (IQR 1.59-5.93). The estimated probability of thrombocytopenia was 50% in the presence of of 7.85 mg/L. Approximately 57.52% (88/153) of the samples fell within the desired range of linezolid (2-8 mg/L) while 31.37% (48/153) experienced underexposure, and overexposure occurred in 11.11% (17/153) of the patients. No significant linear relationships between either body weight or estimated creatinine clearance (CrCL) and were detected. Estimated CrCL ≥100 mL/min was significantly associated with linezolid underexposure (OR 4.121; 95% CI, 1.945-8.731; P<0.001). Estimated CrCL ≤40 mL/min was significantly associated with linezolid overexposure (OR 3.761; 95% CI, 1.324-10.681; P=0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the pharmacodynamic range of linezolid can be defined as 2-8 mg/L for the Chinese population. Renal function partially accounts for the inter-interindividual variability of exposure. The application of TDM might be especially valuable in optimizing linezolid exposure in the majority of patients to avoid therapeutic failure and/or dose-dependent adverse reactions.

摘要

背景

本前瞻性观察性研究针对接受常规剂量利奈唑胺治疗的患者开展,旨在确定利奈唑胺暴露的药效学范围,评估利奈唑胺浓度的个体间变异性,并确定中国人群是否有必要进行利奈唑胺的治疗药物监测(TDM)。

方法

本研究纳入的患者在2019年1月至2019年10月期间接受标准方案治疗时进行了利奈唑胺TDM谷浓度()检测。采用高效液相色谱(HPLC)法分析利奈唑胺。使用逻辑回归确定利奈唑胺的理想范围。进行线性回归和单因素逻辑回归分析以研究与利奈唑胺血浆暴露不当相关的变量。

结果

本研究共纳入84例患者,对其153次利奈唑胺进行了评估。利奈唑胺的中位数为3.43mg/L(IQR 1.59 - 5.93)。当浓度为7.85mg/L时,血小板减少的估计概率为50%。约57.52%(88/153)的样本利奈唑胺浓度在理想范围内(2 - 8mg/L),而31.37%(48/153)的样本暴露不足,11.11%(17/153)的患者出现暴露过度。未检测到体重或估计的肌酐清除率(CrCL)与浓度之间存在显著线性关系。估计的CrCL≥100mL/min与利奈唑胺暴露不足显著相关(OR 4.121;95%CI,1.945 - 8.731;P<0.001)。估计的CrCL≤40mL/min与利奈唑胺暴露过度显著相关(OR 3.761;95%CI,1.324 - 10.681;P = 0.013)。

结论

我们的结果表明,对于中国人群,利奈唑胺的药效学范围可定义为2 - 8mg/L。肾功能部分解释了暴露的个体间变异性。TDM的应用对于优化大多数患者的利奈唑胺暴露以避免治疗失败和/或剂量依赖性不良反应可能特别有价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02fa/7210126/234358d84ecd/atm-08-07-493-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验