Zhao Siya, Cao Jin, Shi Qianling, Wang Zijun, Estill Janne, Lu Shuya, Luo Xufei, Zhao Junxian, Zhang Hairong, Wang Jianjian, Wang Qi, Xun Yangqin, Zhang Jingyi, Lv Meng, Liu Yunlan, Nie Xiaomin, Wang Ling, Zhang Xianzhuo, Li Weiguo, Liu Enmei, Wang Xiaohui, Chen Yaolong
School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Evidence-based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Apr;8(7):500. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.130.
This project aims to evaluate the methods and reporting quality of practice guidelines of five different viruses that have caused Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEIC) over 20 past years: the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), Ebola virus, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), Zika virus and the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We systematically searched databases, guideline websites and government health agency websites from their inception to February 02, 2020 to extract practice guidelines for SARS-CoV, Ebola virus, MERS-CoV, Zika virus, SARS-CoV-2 and the diseases they caused. The literature was screened independently by four researchers. Then, fifteen researchers evaluated the quality of included guidelines using the AGREE-II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II, for methodological quality) instrument and RIGHT (Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in Healthcare, for reporting quality) statement. Finally, a total of 81 guidelines were included, including 21 SARS-CoV guidelines, 11 Ebola virus (EBOV) guidelines, 9 MERS-CoV guidelines, 10 Zika Virus guidelines and 30 SARS-CoV-2 guidelines. The evaluation of the methodological quality indicated that the mean scores of each domain for guidelines of each virus were all below 60%, the scores for guidelines in the domains of "clarity of presentation" being the highest and in the "editorial independence" lowest. The mean reporting rate of each domain for guidelines of each virus was also less than 60%: the reporting rates for the domain "background" were highest, and for the domain "funding and interests" lowest. The methodological and reporting quality of the practice guidelines for SARS-CoV, Ebola virus, MERS-CoV, Zika virus and SARS-CoV-2 guidelines tend to be low. We recommend to follow evidence-based methodology and the RIGHT statement on reporting when developing guidelines.
本项目旨在评估过去20年中引发国际关注的突发公共卫生事件(PHEIC)的五种不同病毒的实践指南的方法和报告质量,这五种病毒分别是:严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒(SARS-CoV)、埃博拉病毒、中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒(MERS-CoV)、寨卡病毒和严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)。我们系统检索了数据库、指南网站和政府卫生机构网站,检索时间从各网站创建至2020年2月2日,以提取SARS-CoV、埃博拉病毒、MERS-CoV、寨卡病毒、SARS-CoV-2及其所致疾病的实践指南。文献由四名研究人员独立筛选。然后,十五名研究人员使用AGREE-II工具(用于评估研究与评价的指南II,评估方法学质量)和RIGHT声明(医疗保健实践指南报告条目,评估报告质量)对纳入指南的质量进行评估。最终,共纳入81项指南,其中包括21项SARS-CoV指南、11项埃博拉病毒(EBOV)指南、9项MERS-CoV指南、10项寨卡病毒指南和30项SARS-CoV-2指南。方法学质量评估表明,每种病毒指南各领域的平均得分均低于60%,“表述清晰度”领域的指南得分最高,“编辑独立性”领域得分最低。每种病毒指南各领域的平均报告率也低于60%:“背景”领域的报告率最高,“资金与利益”领域最低。SARS-CoV、埃博拉病毒、MERS-CoV、寨卡病毒和SARS-CoV-2指南的方法学和报告质量往往较低。我们建议在制定指南时遵循循证方法和RIGHT报告声明。