Suppr超能文献

[青霉素与头孢菌素的交叉过敏:使用头孢菌素时存在问题?]

[Cross-allergy to penicillins and cephalosporins: problematic when prescribing cephalosporins?].

作者信息

Lambregts M Mc, Hendriks B Jc, Sijbom M, Sigaloff K, Nieuwhof C, de Boer M Gj

机构信息

Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum.

Amsterdam UMC, locatie VUmc.

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2020 May 7;164:D4253.

Abstract

Penicillin allergy is commonly reported and often influences selection of antimicrobial treatment. Due to concerns about cross-allergic reactions, other beta-lactams - particularly cephalosporins - may also be avoided. This too often results in less effective treatment, more side effects and overconsumption of reserve antimicrobial agents. Most patients (> 90%) with a penicillin allergy label are not truly allergic, i.e., they do not have an 'immediate type' (IgE-mediated) allergy when tested. Based on current data, even in patients with a true penicillin allergy, the risk of severe cross-allergic reactions to cephalosporins is very low. Clinicians tend to overestimate this risk: this dilemma can be resolved with a systematic appraisal of risk probabilities. The limited risk of a true penicillin allergy being present and the subsequent low risk of a cross-allergic reaction to cephalosporins generally outweighs the disadvantages of selecting an alternative (non-beta-lactam) antimicrobial regimen.

摘要

青霉素过敏的报告很常见,且常常影响抗菌治疗的选择。由于担心交叉过敏反应,其他β-内酰胺类药物——尤其是头孢菌素——也可能被避免使用。这常常导致治疗效果不佳、副作用增多以及储备抗菌药物的过度使用。大多数被贴上青霉素过敏标签的患者(>90%)并非真正过敏,即检测时他们没有“速发型”(IgE介导)过敏反应。根据目前的数据,即使是真正对青霉素过敏的患者,对头孢菌素发生严重交叉过敏反应的风险也非常低。临床医生往往高估了这种风险:通过系统评估风险概率可以解决这一困境。存在真正青霉素过敏的有限风险以及随后对头孢菌素发生交叉过敏反应的低风险,通常超过了选择替代(非β-内酰胺)抗菌治疗方案带来的弊端。

相似文献

4
Penicillin and cephalosporin allergy.青霉素和头孢菌素过敏。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014 May;112(5):404-12. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2014.02.005.
7
Immediate cephalosporin allergy.即刻头孢菌素过敏。
Intern Med J. 2019 Aug;49(8):985-993. doi: 10.1111/imj.14229.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验