• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加利福尼亚州中部柑橘园里的柑橘碎叶病毒的传播。

Spread of Citrus Tristeza Virus in Citrus Orchards in Central California.

机构信息

United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center, 9611 South Riverbend Avenue, Parlier, CA 93648-9757, U.S.A.

Citrus Pest Detection Program, Central California Tristeza Eradication Agency, 22847 Road 140, Tulare, CA 93274-9367, U.S.A.

出版信息

Plant Dis. 2020 Jul;104(7):1925-1931. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-19-1791-RE. Epub 2020 May 12.

DOI:10.1094/PDIS-08-19-1791-RE
PMID:32396051
Abstract

In California, citrus tristeza virus (CTV) is regulated by a State Interior Quarantine. In CTV abatement districts in central California, trees with CTV that react to MCA13 (MCA13-positive [MCA13+]), a strain-discriminating monoclonal antibody, are rogued to prevent virus spread. The Tulare County Pest Control District, however, does not participate in this abatement program except for a 1.6-km zone around the Lindcove Research and Extension Center, Exeter, CA. To quantify CTV spread under these two disparate management programs, CTV surveys were conducted in abatement plots with mandatory aphid control and nonabatement plots. Abatement plot surveys used hierarchical sampling of 25% of trees with samples pooled from four adjacent trees. Detection of MCA13+ CTV in a sample prompted resampling and testing of individual trees. From 2008 to 2018, incidence of CTV increased by an average of 3.9%, with only two MCA13+ samples detected. In contrast, in nonabatement plots, incidence of CTV increased by an average of 4.6% between 2015 and 2018. Increase in MCA13-negative (MCA-) isolates was 11 times greater than that of MCA13+ isolates, with the number of MCA13+ trees increasing by 19 trees between 2015 and 2018. MCA13- isolates were more randomly distributed, suggesting primary spread, whereas MCA13+ CTV isolates were more aggregated, suggesting some secondary spread. These results suggest that spread of MCA13+ isolates was limited by a combination of tree removal and aphid vector suppression. MCA13+ samples were VT isolates with some mixtures with T30 isolates. Despite the presence of VT isolates, all CTV-infected trees were asymptomatic.

摘要

在加利福尼亚州,柑橘衰退病毒(CTV)受到州内检疫的监管。在加利福尼亚州中部的 CTV 防治区,对反应 MCA13(MCA13 阳性 [MCA13+])的、带有 CTV 的树木进行砍伐,以防止病毒传播。然而,图莱里县害虫防治区除了在林德科夫研究与推广中心(埃克塞特,加利福尼亚州)周围 1.6 公里的区域外,不参与该防治计划。为了在这两种不同的管理计划下量化 CTV 的传播,在强制性防治蚜虫的防治区和非防治区进行了 CTV 调查。在防治区的调查中,使用了从四个相邻树木中采集样本的 25%的树木的分层抽样。在样本中检测到 MCA13+CTV 会促使对单个树木进行重新采样和测试。2008 年至 2018 年期间,CTV 的发病率平均增加了 3.9%,仅检测到两个 MCA13+样本。相比之下,在非防治区,2015 年至 2018 年间,CTV 的发病率平均增加了 4.6%。MCA13-(MCA-)分离株的增加速度比 MCA13+分离株快 11 倍,2015 年至 2018 年间,MCA13+树的数量增加了 19 棵。MCA13-分离株的分布更加随机,表明主要传播,而 MCA13+CTV 分离株的分布更加聚集,表明存在一些二次传播。这些结果表明,MCA13+分离株的传播受到树木砍伐和蚜虫载体抑制的共同作用限制。MCA13+样本是 VT 分离株,有些与 T30 分离株混合。尽管存在 VT 分离株,但所有感染 CTV 的树木均无症状。

相似文献

1
Spread of Citrus Tristeza Virus in Citrus Orchards in Central California.加利福尼亚州中部柑橘园里的柑橘碎叶病毒的传播。
Plant Dis. 2020 Jul;104(7):1925-1931. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-19-1791-RE. Epub 2020 May 12.
2
Incidence, Transmissibility, and Genotype Analysis of Citrus tristeza virus (CTV) Isolates from CTV Eradicative and Noneradicative Districts in Central California.加利福尼亚中部柑橘衰退病毒(CTV)根除区和非根除区CTV分离株的发病率、传播性及基因型分析
Plant Dis. 2005 Aug;89(8):859-866. doi: 10.1094/PD-89-0859.
3
Molecular and biological characterization of a novel mild strain of citrus tristeza virus in California.加利福尼亚州一种新型温和柑橘衰退病毒株的分子与生物学特性
Arch Virol. 2018 Jul;163(7):1795-1804. doi: 10.1007/s00705-018-3799-5. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
4
In Situ Immunoassay (ISIA) of Field Grapefruit Trees Inoculated with Mild Isolates of Citrus tristeza virus Indicates Mixed Infections with Severe Isolates.用柑橘衰退病毒温和株系接种的田间葡萄柚树的原位免疫测定(ISIA)表明与强毒株系存在混合感染。
Plant Dis. 2002 May;86(5):458-461. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.5.458.
5
Population structure and diversity of citrus tristeza virus (CTV) isolates in Hunan province, China.中国湖南省柑橘衰退病毒(CTV)分离株的群体结构与多样性
Arch Virol. 2017 Feb;162(2):409-423. doi: 10.1007/s00705-016-3089-z. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
6
Spatial and temporal spread of Citrus tristeza virus and its aphid vectors in the North western area of Morocco.柑橘衰退病毒及其蚜虫传播媒介在摩洛哥西北部地区的时空传播
Insect Sci. 2016 Dec;23(6):903-912. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12228. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
7
Population structure and genetic diversity within California Citrus tristeza virus (CTV) isolates.加利福尼亚柑橘衰退病毒(CTV)分离株的种群结构和遗传多样性
Virus Genes. 2000 Oct;21(3):139-45. doi: 10.1023/a:1008198311398.
8
First Report of Citrus tristeza virus Infecting Citrus Trees in Georgia, USA.柑橘衰退病毒侵染美国佐治亚州柑橘树的首次报道
Plant Dis. 2021 Mar 17. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-02-21-0365-PDN.
9
Development of a simple and rapid reverse transcription-loop mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) assay for sensitive detection of Citrus tristeza virus.建立一种简单快速的逆转录环介导等温扩增(RT-LAMP)检测方法,用于敏感检测柑橘衰退病毒。
J Virol Methods. 2017 Dec;250:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
10
Genotype classification and molecular evidence for the presence of mixed infections in Indian Citrus tristeza virus isolates.印度柑橘衰退病毒分离株的基因型分类及混合感染存在的分子证据
Arch Virol. 2004 Oct;149(10):1911-29. doi: 10.1007/s00705-004-0355-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Bayesian phylodynamic analysis reveals the evolutionary history and the dispersal patterns of citrus tristeza virus in China based on the p25 gene.贝叶斯系统发育动力学分析基于 p25 基因揭示了中国柑橘衰退病毒的进化历史和传播模式。
Virol J. 2023 Oct 3;20(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12985-023-02190-0.
2
Amino acid, sugar, phenolic, and terpenoid profiles are capable of distinguishing Citrus tristeza virus infection status in citrus cultivars: Grapefruit, lemon, mandarin, and sweet orange.氨基酸、糖、酚类和萜烯类物质图谱能够区分柑橘衰退病毒在柑橘品种中的感染状况:葡萄柚、柠檬、橘和甜橙。
PLoS One. 2022 May 10;17(5):e0268255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268255. eCollection 2022.