• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

回顾性观察队列研究:肿瘤学创新与生存进展:在将晚期非小细胞肺癌患者作为单一人群进行治疗的二十年里,我们已经取得了多大的进展?

Retrospective observational cohort study on innovation in oncology and progress in survival: How far have we gotten in the two decades of treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer as a single population?

机构信息

Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden.

ICON Plc, ICO, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 May 12;15(5):e0232669. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232669. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0232669
PMID:32396541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7217468/
Abstract

We assessed the impact of new antineoplastic agents on the overall survival (OS) of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients followed up until 2012. Multivariate regression models were run for OS (outcome) and four proxies for innovation (exposure): Index (InnovInd, for SEER-Research data 1973-2012) and three levels of aggregation of Mean Medication Vintage, i.e. Overall (MMVOverall), using data aggregated at the State Level (MMVState), and using patient-level data (MMVPatient) using data from the US captured in SEER-Medicare 1991-2012. We derived Hazard ratios (HR) from Royston-Parmar models and odds ratios (OR) from a logistic regression on 1-year OS. Including 164,704 patients (median age 72 years, 56.8% stage IV, 61.8% with no comorbidities, 37.8% with adenocarcinoma, 22.9% with squamous-cell, 6.1% were censored). One-year OS improved from 0.22 in 1973 to 0.39 in 2012, in correlation with InnovInd (r = 0.97). Ten new NSCLC drugs were approved and 28 more used off-label. Regression-models results indicate that therapeutic innovation only marginally reduced the risk of dying (HROverall = 0.98 [0.98-0.98], HRMMV-Patient = 0.98 [0.97-0.98], and HRMMV-State = 0.98 [0.98-0.98], and slightly improved 1-year survival (ORMMV-Overall = 1.05 95%CI [1.04-1.05]). These results were validated with data from the Swedish National Health Data registers. Until 2013, aNSCLC patients were treated undifferentiated and the introduction of innovative therapies had statistically significant, albeit modest, effects on survival. Most treatments used off-guidelines highlight the high unmet need; however new advancements in treatment may further improve survival.

摘要

我们评估了新的抗肿瘤药物对晚期非小细胞肺癌(aNSCLC)患者总体生存(OS)的影响,这些患者的随访时间截至 2012 年。我们对 OS(结局)和四个创新指标(暴露)进行了多变量回归模型分析:指数(InnovInd,用于 SEER-Research 数据 1973-2012)和三种平均药物使用年限的聚合水平,即总体(MMVOverall),使用州级数据(MMVState)和使用患者级数据(MMVPatient),数据来源于 1991-2012 年 SEER- Medicare 捕获的数据。我们使用 Royston-Parmar 模型得出风险比(HR),使用逻辑回归得出 1 年 OS 的比值比(OR)。纳入 164704 名患者(中位年龄 72 岁,56.8%为 IV 期,61.8%无合并症,37.8%为腺癌,22.9%为鳞状细胞癌,6.1%被删失)。1973 年 1 年 OS 为 0.22,2012 年为 0.39,与 InnovInd 呈正相关(r=0.97)。批准了 10 种新的 NSCLC 药物,28 种药物超适应证使用。回归模型结果表明,治疗创新仅略微降低了死亡风险(HROverall=0.98[0.98-0.98],HRMMV-Patient=0.98[0.97-0.98],HRMMV-State=0.98[0.98-0.98]),略微提高了 1 年生存率(ORMMV-Overall=1.0595%CI[1.04-1.05])。这些结果通过瑞典国家健康数据登记处的数据得到验证。直到 2013 年,aNSCLC 患者的治疗方法都没有区别,创新疗法的引入对生存有统计学意义,但影响较小。大多数超适应证使用的治疗方法突出了高度未满足的需求;然而,新的治疗进展可能会进一步提高生存率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f75/7217468/c984dab24536/pone.0232669.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f75/7217468/ee312e14d2ae/pone.0232669.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f75/7217468/a80c85746f40/pone.0232669.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f75/7217468/c984dab24536/pone.0232669.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f75/7217468/ee312e14d2ae/pone.0232669.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f75/7217468/a80c85746f40/pone.0232669.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f75/7217468/c984dab24536/pone.0232669.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Retrospective observational cohort study on innovation in oncology and progress in survival: How far have we gotten in the two decades of treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer as a single population?回顾性观察队列研究:肿瘤学创新与生存进展:在将晚期非小细胞肺癌患者作为单一人群进行治疗的二十年里,我们已经取得了多大的进展?
PLoS One. 2020 May 12;15(5):e0232669. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232669. eCollection 2020.
2
Progress in the Treatment and Outcomes for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.早期非小细胞肺癌治疗和结局的进展。
Lung. 2018 Jun;196(3):351-358. doi: 10.1007/s00408-018-0110-1. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
3
Guideline-concordant Care Improves Overall Survival for Locally Advanced Non-Small-cell Lung Carcinoma Patients: A National Cancer Database Analysis.指南一致的治疗可改善局部晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的总生存:一项国家癌症数据库分析。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2017 Nov;18(6):706-718. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
4
Real-World Data on Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in EGFR Mutation-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with First-Line Gefitinib.EGFR 突变阳性的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者一线使用吉非替尼治疗的总生存预后因素的真实世界数据。
Oncologist. 2017 Sep;22(9):1075-1083. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0331. Epub 2017 May 15.
5
Real-world treatment patterns and costs in a US Medicare population with metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer.美国医疗保险转移性鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者的真实世界治疗模式和费用。
Lung Cancer. 2015 Feb;87(2):176-85. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
6
Treatment disparities for disabled medicare beneficiaries with stage I non-small cell lung cancer.患有I期非小细胞肺癌的残疾医疗保险受益人的治疗差异。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Apr;89(4):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.042.
7
Impact of Radiation Dose to the Host Immune System on Tumor Control and Survival for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Definitive Radiation Therapy.根治性放疗治疗 III 期非小细胞肺癌时宿主免疫系统辐射剂量对肿瘤控制和生存的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Oct 1;105(2):346-355. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.05.064. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
8
Comparison of Survival Rates After a Combination of Local Treatment and Systemic Therapy vs Systemic Therapy Alone for Treatment of Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.局部治疗联合全身治疗与单纯全身治疗治疗 IV 期非小细胞肺癌的生存率比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e199702. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9702.
9
Referral patterns in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: impact on delivery of treatment and survival in a contemporary population based cohort.晚期非小细胞肺癌的转诊模式:对当代基于人群队列中治疗和生存的影响。
Lung Cancer. 2014 Dec;86(3):344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.09.016. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
10
Treatment, outcome and quality of life of 1239 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer - final results from the prospective German TLK cohort study.1239 例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的治疗、转归和生活质量 - 德国前瞻性 TLK 队列研究的最终结果。
Lung Cancer. 2017 Oct;112:216-224. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.07.031. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative efficacy and safety of second-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with wild-type or unknown status for epidermal growth factor receptor: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.表皮生长因子受体野生型或状态未知的晚期非小细胞肺癌二线治疗的比较疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMC Med. 2017 Oct 30;15(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0954-x.
2
PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies efficacy and safety versus docetaxel monotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients after first-line treatment option: systems assessment.一线治疗方案后,PD-1/PD-L1抗体与多西他赛单药治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效和安全性:系统评估
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 27;8(35):59677-59689. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19641. eCollection 2017 Aug 29.
3
A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of antibodies targeting PD-1/PD-L1 in treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer.
靶向PD-1/PD-L1抗体治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(52):e5539. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005539.
4
EGFR-TKIs versus taxanes agents in therapy for nonsmall-cell lung cancer patients: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂与紫杉烷类药物治疗非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效比较:一项遵循PRISMA规范的系统评价及Meta分析与Meta回归分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(50):e5601. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005601.
5
Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-A Meta-Analysis.《转移性 EGFR 突变非小细胞肺癌中免疫检查点抑制剂的Meta 分析》
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Feb;12(2):403-407. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
6
Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody therapy for pretreated advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.抗程序性死亡蛋白1/程序性死亡配体1抗体疗法用于经治的晚期非小细胞肺癌:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(35):e4611. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004611.
7
Progress in lung cancer: ASCO 2015.肺癌进展:2015年美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)会议
Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;24(4):367-8. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
8
Bayesian network meta-comparison of maintenance treatments for stage IIIb/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with good performance status not progressing after first-line induction chemotherapy: results by performance status, EGFR mutation, histology and response to previous induction.贝叶斯网络荟萃分析在一线诱导化疗后疾病未进展且体能状态良好的 IIIb/IV 期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中维持治疗的疗效:基于体能状态、EGFR 突变、组织学和对前序诱导治疗的反应的结果
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov;51(16):2330-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
9
Disparate survival trends in histologic subtypes of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a population-based analysis.转移性非小细胞肺癌组织学亚型的不同生存趋势:一项基于人群的分析。
Am J Cancer Res. 2015 Jun 15;5(7):2229-40. eCollection 2015.
10
The impact of pharmaceutical innovation on premature mortality, cancer mortality, and hospitalization in Slovenia, 1997-2010.1997 - 2010年斯洛文尼亚药物创新对过早死亡率、癌症死亡率和住院率的影响
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Apr;13(2):207-22. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0144-3.