Lichtenberg Frank R
Columbia University, 504 Uris Hall, 3022 Broadway, New York, NY, 10027, USA,
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Apr;13(2):207-22. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0144-3.
In Slovenia during the period 2000-2010, the number of years of potential life lost before the age of 70 years per 100,000 population under 70 years of age declined 25 %.
The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that pharmaceutical innovation played a key role in reducing premature mortality from all diseases in Slovenia, and to examine the effects of pharmaceutical innovation on the age-standardized number of cancer deaths and on hospitalization from all diseases. Estimates and other data were used to calculate the incremental cost effectiveness of pharmaceutical innovation in Slovenia.
Longitudinal disease-level data was analyzed to determine whether diseases for which there was greater pharmaceutical innovation-a larger increase in the number of new chemical entities (NCEs) previously launched-had larger declines in premature mortality, the age-standardized number of cancer deaths, and the number of hospital discharges. My methodology controls for the effects of macroeconomic trends and overall changes in the healthcare system.
Premature mortality from a disease is inversely related to the number of NCEs launched more than 5 years earlier. On average, the introduction of an additional NCE for a disease reduced premature mortality from the disease by 2.4 % 7 years later. The age-standardized number of cancer deaths is inversely related to the number of NCEs launched 1-6 years earlier, conditional on the age-standardized number of new cancer cases diagnosed 0-2 years earlier. On average, the launch of an NCE reduced the number of hospital discharges 1 year later by approximately 1.5 %.
The estimates imply that approximately two-thirds of the 2000-2010 decline in premature mortality was due to pharmaceutical innovation. If no NCEs had been launched in Slovenia during 1992-2003, the age-standardized number of cancer deaths in 2008 would have been 12.2 % higher. The NCEs launched in Slovenia during 2003-2009 are estimated to have reduced the number of hospital discharges in 2010 by 7 %. If we assume that pharmaceutical expenditure was the only type of expenditure affected by pharmaceutical innovation, the cost per life-year saved was
在2000年至2010年期间的斯洛文尼亚,每10万70岁以下人口中70岁之前潜在寿命损失年数下降了25%。
本研究的目的是检验药物创新在降低斯洛文尼亚所有疾病过早死亡率方面发挥关键作用这一假设,并研究药物创新对年龄标准化癌症死亡人数和所有疾病住院率的影响。利用估计值和其他数据来计算斯洛文尼亚药物创新的增量成本效益。
分析纵向疾病层面的数据,以确定那些有更大药物创新——此前推出的新化学实体(NCE)数量有更大增幅——的疾病在过早死亡率、年龄标准化癌症死亡人数和出院人数方面是否有更大幅度的下降。我的方法控制了宏观经济趋势和医疗保健系统总体变化的影响。
一种疾病的过早死亡率与5年多前推出的NCE数量呈负相关。平均而言,为一种疾病额外推出一种NCE会在7年后使该疾病的过早死亡率降低2.4%。在以0至2年前诊断的新癌症病例的年龄标准化数量为条件的情况下,年龄标准化癌症死亡人数与1至6年前推出的NCE数量呈负相关。平均而言,推出一种NCE会在1年后使出院人数减少约1.5%。
估计表明,2000年至2010年过早死亡率下降的约三分之二归因于药物创新。如果1992年至2003年期间斯洛文尼亚没有推出任何NCE,2008年年龄标准化癌症死亡人数会高出12.2%。据估计,2003年至2009年期间在斯洛文尼亚推出的NCE使2010年的出院人数减少了7%。如果我们假设药物支出是受药物创新影响的唯一支出类型,那么每挽救一个生命年的成本为3953欧元,这甚至远低于对挽救一个生命年价值的最低估计。此外,药物支出增加的85%可能已被医院支出的减少所抵消;因此,每挽救一个生命年实际成本可能仅为611欧元。