J Phys Act Health. 2020 May 11;17(6):673-681. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2019-0171.
The objective of this systematic review was to determine the efficacy of the mat Pilates method on body composition in healthy adult subjects compared with traditional exercise or control condition models.
Systematic review with meta-analysis.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, PEDro, SciELO, CINAHAL, and the Cochrane Library.
A total of 10 eligible studies were selected for revision. The findings of this review demonstrated that the mat Pilates method was not more effective than the traditional exercise or control condition models for the analyzed variables (body mass index, lean mass, body fat percentage, and abdominal circumference). Moreover, in the exploratory analysis with older people, adults, and overweight/obese individuals, the mat Pilates method was also not superior for the analyzed outcomes.
The findings of this study suggest that the mat Pilates method is no better than the control condition or other types of training to reduce body composition.
本系统评价的目的是确定垫上普拉提方法在健康成年受试者的身体成分方面的功效，与传统运动或对照条件模型相比。
系统评价与荟萃分析。
MEDLINE、EMBASE、SPORTDiscus、PEDro、SciELO、CINAHAL 和 Cochrane 图书馆。
共有 10 项符合条件的研究被选入进行修订。本综述的结果表明，垫上普拉提方法在分析变量（体重指数、瘦体重、体脂百分比和腰围）方面并不优于传统运动或对照条件模型。此外，在对老年人、成年人和超重/肥胖个体进行的探索性分析中，垫上普拉提方法在分析结果方面也没有优势。
本研究结果表明，垫上普拉提方法并不优于对照条件或其他类型的训练来减少身体成分。
