• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

YouTube是否提供可靠且高质量的信息?宫颈涂片检查视频的评估。

Does YouTube Provide Reliable and High-Quality Information? Assessment of Pap Smear Test Videos.

作者信息

Gursoy Ali, Peker Hakan

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maltepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Maltepe University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey,

Nisantasi Vocational School, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Acta Cytol. 2020;64(5):425-432. doi: 10.1159/000507105. Epub 2020 May 12.

DOI:10.1159/000507105
PMID:32396906
Abstract

AIM

YouTube is one of the most popular video-sharing platforms and is used by many people as a source of information regarding health conditions. Although there are many studies examining YouTube health-related videos in terms of quality, content and accuracy, there is not any study observing the content of YouTube videos about the "Pap smear test." Therefore, we intended to evaluate YouTube videos related to the Pap smear test.

METHODS

We made a search by typing "Pap smear test" and observed the first 100 videos. According to our selection criteria, only 42 videos were reviewed. We used 3 different questionnaires to rate the videos. The videos were independently rated by 2 gynecologists in terms of technical aspects, follow-up protocol, and video quality.

RESULTS

Our study showed that clarity of the technical aspects of Pap smear testing (Q1) was 40% and that of the follow-up protocol (Q2) was only 11%. In terms of video quality (Q3), the adequacy rate was 34%. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between search rank and the video power index (which increased as the ranking decreased to rank 1, r: -0.481).

CONCLUSION

We did not find quality and reliable information on YouTube videos about the Pap smear test, which is important for early detection of cervical cancers. While preparing health-related videos for YouTube and similar websites, the support of professional healthcare workers will help provide more accurate content.

摘要

目的

YouTube是最受欢迎的视频分享平台之一,许多人将其用作获取健康状况信息的来源。尽管有许多研究从质量、内容和准确性方面对YouTube上与健康相关的视频进行了考察,但尚无任何研究观察过YouTube上关于“巴氏涂片检查”视频的内容。因此,我们旨在评估与巴氏涂片检查相关的YouTube视频。

方法

我们通过输入“巴氏涂片检查”进行搜索,并观察了前100个视频。根据我们的选择标准,仅对42个视频进行了审查。我们使用3种不同的问卷对视频进行评分。2名妇科医生分别从技术方面、后续方案和视频质量对这些视频进行独立评分。

结果

我们的研究表明,巴氏涂片检查技术方面(问题1)的清晰度为40%,后续方案(问题2)的清晰度仅为11%。在视频质量(问题3)方面,充足率为34%。搜索排名与视频影响力指数之间存在统计学上的显著负相关(随着排名降至第1,该指数上升,r:-0.481)。

结论

我们在YouTube上关于巴氏涂片检查的视频中未找到高质量且可靠的信息,而巴氏涂片检查对宫颈癌的早期检测至关重要。在为YouTube及类似网站制作与健康相关的视频时,专业医护人员的支持将有助于提供更准确的内容。

相似文献

1
Does YouTube Provide Reliable and High-Quality Information? Assessment of Pap Smear Test Videos.YouTube是否提供可靠且高质量的信息?宫颈涂片检查视频的评估。
Acta Cytol. 2020;64(5):425-432. doi: 10.1159/000507105. Epub 2020 May 12.
2
Are DISCERN and JAMA Suitable Instruments for Assessing YouTube Videos on Thyroid Cancer? Methodological Concerns.DISCERN 和 JAMA 是否适合评估关于甲状腺癌的 YouTube 视频?方法学问题。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Dec;35(6):1267-1277. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01763-9.
3
YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok videos as sources of medical information on laryngeal carcinoma: cross-sectional content analysis study.YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok 视频作为喉癌医学信息来源:横断面内容分析研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):1594. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19077-6.
4
[YouTube as an informational source for brachial plexus blocks: evaluation of content and educational value].[作为臂丛神经阻滞信息来源的YouTube:内容与教育价值评估]
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019 Mar-Apr;69(2):168-176. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2018.11.004. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
5
YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer.YouTube作为口腔癌信息的一个来源。
Oral Dis. 2016 Apr;22(3):202-8. doi: 10.1111/odi.12434. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
6
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.开放获取视频分享平台YouTube上袖状胃切除术视频中信息的可靠性、实用性及质量评估
Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1477-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2.
7
Quality of Information Available on YouTube Videos Pertaining to Thyroid Cancer.YouTube 视频中有关甲状腺癌信息的质量。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Jun;35(3):599-605. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01502-9.
8
YouTube Videos as a Source of Misinformation on Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.YouTube 视频作为特发性肺纤维化错误信息的来源。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 May;16(5):572-579. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201809-644OC.
9
The quality of video information on burn first aid available on YouTube.YouTube上烧伤急救视频信息的质量。
Burns. 2013 Aug;39(5):856-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2012.10.017. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
10
Dissemination of Misinformative and Biased Information about Prostate Cancer on YouTube.YouTube 上有关前列腺癌的错误信息和偏见传播。
Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):564-567. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.056. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Content and quality of YouTube regarding women's health: a scoping review.YouTube 上有关女性健康的内容和质量:范围综述。
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2023 Sep;29(3):179-189. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2023.08.19. Epub 2023 Sep 26.