• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DISCERN 和 JAMA 是否适合评估关于甲状腺癌的 YouTube 视频?方法学问题。

Are DISCERN and JAMA Suitable Instruments for Assessing YouTube Videos on Thyroid Cancer? Methodological Concerns.

机构信息

Curriculum Development and Research Unit, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2020 Dec;35(6):1267-1277. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01763-9.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-020-01763-9
PMID:32472374
Abstract

The incidence of thyroid cancer continues to increase worldwide. The challenge facing the treatment of thyroid cancers is related to the fact that this disease exhibits a broad range of clinical behaviour from indolent tumour to very aggressive malignancies. Therefore, the public and patient education about thyroid cancer are becoming a crucial step in facing the challenge imposed by this cancer. Currently, social media channels such as YouTube, a video-sharing website on the Internet, play a significant role in public and patient education. Research on the part of YouTube in public education about cancer is on the rise, including a paper on thyroid cancer published recently in the Journal of Cancer Education. However, researchers conducting studies should use tools that are designed to assess videos, not written information or websites. DISCERN instrument and JAMA benchmark tools are not intended to evaluate videos such as those of YouTube. An ideal instrument for assessing YouTube should cover several parameters to identify educationally useful videos, including (i) scientific accuracy of video content, (ii) clarity of the massage given, (iii) authority (creator), (iv) pedagogy and educational basis and (v) technical design, including quality images and good visuals, production style, quality scripts, clear sounds and no noises in the background. While video images help in reinforcing the words and the message, both picture and sound quality are vital in creating a strong mental impression and engaging the audience. This commentary calls for the development of a standardised protocol that can help researchers to enhance their research publications and ensure that adequate and accurate data have been collected and analysed. Such a move will help us in establishing the right literature in this area and will help researchers conducting reviews and meta-analysis on YouTube videos.

摘要

甲状腺癌的发病率在全球范围内持续上升。甲状腺癌治疗所面临的挑战与该病临床表现多样有关,从惰性肿瘤到侵袭性很强的恶性肿瘤均有。因此,公众和患者对甲状腺癌的教育正成为应对这一癌症挑战的关键步骤。目前,YouTube 等社交媒体在公众和患者教育中发挥着重要作用,YouTube 是一个互联网视频分享网站。关于 YouTube 在癌症公众教育中的研究越来越多,最近在《癌症教育杂志》上发表了一篇关于甲状腺癌的论文。然而,进行研究的研究人员应使用旨在评估视频的工具,而不是书面信息或网站。DISCERN 工具和 JAMA 基准工具并非用于评估 YouTube 等视频。评估 YouTube 的理想工具应涵盖几个参数,以识别具有教育意义的视频,包括:(i) 视频内容的科学准确性;(ii) 信息传达的清晰度;(iii) 权威性(创作者);(iv) 教学法和教育基础;(v) 技术设计,包括高质量的图像和良好的视觉效果、制作风格、高质量的脚本、清晰的声音和背景中无噪音。虽然视频图像有助于加强文字和信息,但图像和声音质量对于形成强烈的心理印象和吸引观众至关重要。本评论呼吁制定一个标准化协议,帮助研究人员增强他们的研究出版物,并确保收集和分析了足够和准确的数据。这样的举措将有助于我们在该领域建立正确的文献,并帮助研究人员对 YouTube 视频进行综述和荟萃分析。

相似文献

1
Are DISCERN and JAMA Suitable Instruments for Assessing YouTube Videos on Thyroid Cancer? Methodological Concerns.DISCERN 和 JAMA 是否适合评估关于甲状腺癌的 YouTube 视频?方法学问题。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Dec;35(6):1267-1277. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01763-9.
2
Quality of Information Available on YouTube Videos Pertaining to Thyroid Cancer.YouTube 视频中有关甲状腺癌信息的质量。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Jun;35(3):599-605. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01502-9.
3
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.开放获取视频分享平台YouTube上袖状胃切除术视频中信息的可靠性、实用性及质量评估
Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1477-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2.
4
Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube.分析 YouTube 上斜视相关信息的质量、可靠性和普及度。
Strabismus. 2020 Dec;28(4):175-180. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2020.1836002. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
5
Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A YouTube-Based Quality-Control Study.基于 YouTube 的半月板患者教育在线视频资源质量控制研究:一项质量控制研究。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jan;36(1):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.033.
6
Is quality of YouTube content on Bankart lesion and its surgical treatment adequate?关于 Bankart 损伤及其手术治疗的 YouTube 内容质量是否足够?
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Feb 26;15(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01590-0.
7
YouTube as an information source for clubfoot: a quality analysis of video content.YouTube 作为足内翻信息源:视频内容的质量分析。
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2020 Jul;29(4):375-378. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000694.
8
A quality assessment of YouTube as an information resource for tonsillectomy.YouTube 作为扁桃体切除术信息资源的质量评估。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 May;180:111955. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.111955. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
9
Assessing quality and reliability of online videos on tachycardia: a YouTube video-based study.评估心动过速相关在线视频的质量和可靠性:基于 YouTube 视频的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):2620. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20062-2.
10
Does YouTube Provide Reliable and High-Quality Information? Assessment of Pap Smear Test Videos.YouTube是否提供可靠且高质量的信息?宫颈涂片检查视频的评估。
Acta Cytol. 2020;64(5):425-432. doi: 10.1159/000507105. Epub 2020 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of the quality of endoscopic tympanoplasty and endoscopic myringoplasty videos on YouTube.YouTube 上内镜下鼓室成形术和内镜下鼓膜成形术视频质量的评估
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Aug 21;25(1):1181. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07775-7.
2
YouTube and Bilibili as sources of information on oral cancer: cross-sectional content analysis study.YouTube和哔哩哔哩作为口腔癌信息来源:横断面内容分析研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21671. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02898-9.
3
Cross-platform analysis of atrial fibrillation scientific videos: using composite index and a basic assessment scale.
心房颤动科学视频的跨平台分析:使用综合指数和基本评估量表。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 25;13:1507776. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1507776. eCollection 2025.
4
A critical analysis of online patient-directed resources on catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias.对心室心律失常导管消融在线患者导向资源的批判性分析。
J Arrhythm. 2025 Mar 6;41(2):e70026. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70026. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
Evaluating Online Cannabis Health Information for Thai Breast Cancer Survivors Using the Quality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST): Mixed Method Study.使用质量评估评分工具(QUEST)评估泰国乳腺癌幸存者的在线大麻健康信息:混合方法研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2024 Dec 24;10:e55300. doi: 10.2196/55300.
6
YouTube as a Source of Information in Trauma Management for ATLS (10th Edition) Guidelines: Evaluation of Trauma Management Videos on YouTube.YouTube作为美国创伤生命支持(第10版)指南中创伤管理信息来源:对YouTube上创伤管理视频的评估
Emerg Med Int. 2024 Oct 24;2024:7077469. doi: 10.1155/2024/7077469. eCollection 2024.
7
Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos on Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) for Cancer Using a Newly Developed Tool.使用新开发工具评估关于癌症的补充和替代医学(CAM)的 YouTube 视频的质量。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:15347354241293417. doi: 10.1177/15347354241293417.
8
The Quality of Short Videos as a Source of Coronary Heart Disease Information on TikTok: Cross-Sectional Study.短视频质量作为 TikTok 冠心病信息来源的研究:横断面研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 3;8:e51513. doi: 10.2196/51513.
9
YouTube Videos Are a Moderately Comprehensive, Reliable, and Quality Option to Learn About "Multiple Sclerosis and Sexuality".YouTube视频是了解“多发性硬化症与性取向”的一个适度全面、可靠且优质的选择。
Int J Sex Health. 2024 May 6;36(3):406-414. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2024.2349597. eCollection 2024.
10
Quality controlled YouTube content intervention for enhancing health literacy and health behavioural intention: A randomized controlled study.用于提高健康素养和健康行为意图的质量控制YouTube内容干预:一项随机对照研究。
Digit Health. 2024 Jun 17;10:20552076241263691. doi: 10.1177/20552076241263691. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.