Department of Immunology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):800-802. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2020.2632. Epub 2020 May 12.
In Lyme disease, the interpretation of diagnostic assays is often misunderstood. Cross-reactions of Borrelia proteins with antigens from other bacterial species are well known. Therefore, to diagnose Lyme disease, the finding of positive IgM antibodies must be accompanied by objectively verified clinical signs and a history of a possible tick exposure. Positive Borrelia IgM antibodies in healthy individuals with nonspecific clinical symptoms are likely a false-positive result for Lyme disease and neither long-term antibiotic treatment nor cycling of different antibiotic regimens is beneficial. To date, there is clear evidence that positive serology does not indicate infection with Borrelia species. Borrelia serology has been reported to be positive for months or years in ∼20% of healthy patients who had experienced Lyme disease in the past. Thus, serology as a single diagnostic tool has a very limited value and should be used only to support clinically suspected cases.
在莱姆病中,诊断检测的解读常常被误解。众所周知,伯氏疏螺旋体蛋白与其他细菌物种的抗原之间存在交叉反应。因此,要诊断莱姆病,必须发现阳性 IgM 抗体,并伴有客观证实的临床症状和可能的蜱虫暴露史。在无特异性临床症状的健康个体中,伯氏疏螺旋体 IgM 抗体阳性可能是莱姆病的假阳性结果,长期使用抗生素治疗或循环使用不同的抗生素方案均无益处。迄今为止,有明确的证据表明,阳性血清学检查结果并不表明存在伯氏疏螺旋体感染。据报道,在过去患过莱姆病的约 20%的健康患者中,伯氏疏螺旋体血清学检查结果可呈阳性达数月甚至数年。因此,作为单一诊断工具的血清学检查的价值非常有限,仅应用于支持疑似临床病例。