Suppr超能文献

运动干预对静息代谢率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The effect of exercise interventions on resting metabolic rate: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Bond Institute of Health and Sport , Gold Coast, Australia.

Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University , Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

J Sports Sci. 2020 Jul;38(14):1635-1649. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1754716. Epub 2020 May 12.

Abstract

The systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effect of aerobic, resistance and combined exercise on RMR (kCal·day) and performed a methodological assessment of indirect calorimetry protocols within the included studies. Subgroup analyses included energy/diet restriction and body composition changes. Randomized control trials (RCTs), quasi - RCTs and cohort trials featuring a physical activity intervention of any form and duration excluding single exercise bouts were included. Participant exclusions included medical conditions impacting upon RMR, the elderly (≥65 years of age) or pregnant, lactating or post-menopausal women. The review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD 42,017,058,503). 1669 articles were identified; 22 were included in the qualitative analysis and 18 were meta-analysed. Exercise interventions (aerobic and resistance exercise combined) did not increase resting metabolic rate (mean difference (MD): 74.6 kCal·day[95% CI: -13.01, 161.33], P = 0.10). While there was no effect of aerobic exercise on RMR (MD: 81.65 kCal·day[95% CI: -57.81, 221.10], P = 0.25), resistance exercise increased RMR compared to controls (MD: 96.17 kCal·day[95% CI: 45.17, 147.16], P = 0.0002). This systematic review effectively synthesises the effect of exercise interventions on RMR in comparison to controls; despite heterogenous methodologies and high risk of bias within included studies.

摘要

本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了有氧运动、抗阻运动和结合运动对静息代谢率(kCal·day)的影响,并对纳入研究中的间接测热法方案进行了方法学评估。亚组分析包括能量/饮食限制和身体成分变化。纳入了任何形式和持续时间的身体活动干预的随机对照试验(RCT)、准 RCT 和队列试验,但不包括单次运动。排除了影响静息代谢率的医疗条件、老年人(≥65 岁)或孕妇、哺乳期或绝经后妇女。该综述已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(CRD42,017,058,503)中注册。共确定了 1669 篇文章;22 篇被纳入定性分析,18 篇进行荟萃分析。运动干预(有氧运动和抗阻运动结合)并未增加静息代谢率(平均差异(MD):74.6 kCal·day[95% CI:-13.01, 161.33],P = 0.10)。虽然有氧运动对 RMR 没有影响(MD:81.65 kCal·day[95% CI:-57.81, 221.10],P = 0.25),但与对照组相比,抗阻运动增加了 RMR(MD:96.17 kCal·day[95% CI:45.17, 147.16],P = 0.0002)。本系统评价有效地综合了运动干预对 RMR 的影响与对照组相比;尽管纳入研究中的方法学存在异质性和高偏倚风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验