• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国心脏病患儿潜在异常神经发育的转诊途径:德尔菲共识

A referral pathway for potentially abnormal neurodevelopment in children with heart disease in the United Kingdom: a Delphi consensus.

作者信息

Hoskote Aparna, Wray Jo, Banks Victoria, Brown Katherine, Lakhanpaul Monica

机构信息

Heart and Lung Directorate, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Paediatr Open. 2020 Apr 21;4(1):e000587. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000587. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000587
PMID:32399503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7204815/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Children with congenital heart disease have complex medical and neurodevelopmental needs. We aimed to develop a multi-professional consensus-based referral pathway applicable to action the results of the brief developmental assessment (BDA), a validated early recognition tool, that categorises the neurodevelopmental status as green (appropriate for age), amber (equivocal) or red (delayed) in children aged between 4 months and 5 years.

METHODS

A Delphi consensus survey detailing two scenarios-a child categorised as delayed (red) and another as equivocal (amber) on administration of the BDA at the time of discharge from the tertiary centre-was sent to 80 expert professionals from primary, secondary and tertiary care seeking agreement on next steps and referral pathways. An iterative process was proposed with a pre-defined rule of 75% for consensus.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 77 Delphi panel experts in Round 1, 73 in Round 2 and 70 in Round 3. Consensus was achieved (1) for the child with amber or red BDA, the child should be under the care of a paediatrician with expertise in cardiology (PEC) (or general paediatrician if no PEC) based at their local hospital, (2) for the child with red BDA, the PEC should initiate referral to community services at first assessment, (3) for child with amber BDA, a re-assessment by the health visitor should occur within 1-2 months, with referral to community services and notification to the PEC if on-going concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

The Delphi process enabled a consensus to be reached between health professionals on referral pathways for specialist neurodevelopmental assessment/treatment for children with heart disease, in response to amber or red BDA results. The agreed referral pathway, if implemented, could underpin a national guideline to address and intervene on the neurodevelopmental difficulties in children with heart disease.

摘要

引言

患有先天性心脏病的儿童有复杂的医疗和神经发育需求。我们旨在制定一种基于多专业共识的转诊途径,以应用简短发育评估(BDA)的结果。BDA是一种经过验证的早期识别工具,可将4个月至5岁儿童的神经发育状况分为绿色(发育与年龄相符)、黄色(不明确)或红色(发育迟缓)。

方法

向来自初级、二级和三级医疗保健机构的80名专家专业人员发送了一份德尔菲共识调查,详细描述了两种情况——一名儿童在三级中心出院时进行BDA评估被分类为发育迟缓(红色),另一名被分类为不明确(黄色)——以寻求就后续步骤和转诊途径达成一致。提出了一个迭代过程,预先设定的共识规则为75%。

结果

第一轮有77名德尔菲小组专家完成了调查,第二轮有73名,第三轮有70名。达成了以下共识:(1)对于BDA评估为黄色或红色的儿童,应由当地医院具有心脏病学专业知识的儿科医生(或在没有心脏病学专业儿科医生的情况下由普通儿科医生)进行护理;(2)对于BDA评估为红色的儿童,心脏病学专业儿科医生应在首次评估时启动向社区服务机构的转诊;(3)对于BDA评估为黄色的儿童,健康访视员应在1至2个月内进行重新评估,如果仍有担忧,则转诊至社区服务机构并通知心脏病学专业儿科医生。

结论

德尔菲过程使卫生专业人员就心脏病儿童的专科神经发育评估/治疗转诊途径达成了共识,以应对BDA评估为黄色或红色的结果。如果实施商定的转诊途径,可为解决和干预心脏病儿童的神经发育困难的国家指南提供支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e51/7204815/359b6a3a2128/bmjpo-2019-000587f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e51/7204815/359b6a3a2128/bmjpo-2019-000587f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e51/7204815/359b6a3a2128/bmjpo-2019-000587f01.jpg

相似文献

1
A referral pathway for potentially abnormal neurodevelopment in children with heart disease in the United Kingdom: a Delphi consensus.英国心脏病患儿潜在异常神经发育的转诊途径:德尔菲共识
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2020 Apr 21;4(1):e000587. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000587. eCollection 2020.
2
Pedi-R-MAPP: The development of a nutritional awareness tool for use in remote paediatric consultations using a modified Delphi consensus.儿童远程医疗营养评估工具(Pedi-R-MAPP):使用改良 Delphi 共识开发的用于远程儿科咨询的营养意识工具。
Clin Nutr. 2022 Mar;41(3):661-672. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.01.009. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
3
Building consensus on inpatient discharge pathway components in the management of blunt thoracic injuries: An e-Delphi study amongst an international professional expert panel.建立共识:在管理钝性胸部损伤方面,住院患者出院路径组成部分:国际专业专家小组的电子德尔菲研究。
Injury. 2021 Sep;52(9):2551-2559. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.061. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
4
Selective mutism: a consensus based care pathway of good practice.选择性缄默症:基于共识的良好实践护理路径。
Arch Dis Child. 2008 Oct;93(10):838-44. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.129437. Epub 2008 May 2.
5
Assessing and investigating children with suspected bone and abdominal tumours: an e-Delphi consensus process.评估和调查疑似骨和腹部肿瘤的儿童:一项电子德尔菲共识过程。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023 Mar;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001771.
6
The development of a regional referral pathway for locally recurrent rectal cancer: A Delphi consensus study.局部复发性直肠癌区域性转诊途径的制定:德尔菲共识研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Mar;46(3):470-475. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.12.001. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
7
Delphi method to identify expert opinion to support children's cancer referral guidelines.德尔菲法鉴定专家意见以支持儿童癌症转诊指南。
Arch Dis Child. 2020 Mar;105(3):241-246. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317235. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
8
When is referral from primary care to specialist services appropriate for survivors of stroke? A modified RAND-appropriateness consensus study.何时将中风幸存者从初级保健转诊至专科服务是合适的?一项经改良的 RAND 适宜性共识研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Apr 18;21(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01139-4.
9
PIPc study: development of indicators of potentially inappropriate prescribing in children (PIPc) in primary care using a modified Delphi technique.儿童潜在不适当处方指标(PIPc)研究:采用改良德尔菲技术制定基层医疗中儿童潜在不适当处方(PIPc)指标。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 6;6(9):e012079. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012079.
10
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurodevelopmental follow-up care pathways and processes for children with congenital heart disease in Australia.澳大利亚先天性心脏病患儿的神经发育随访护理途径与流程
Pediatr Res. 2024 Nov 23. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03722-2.
2
Lessons From the Queensland Paediatric Cardiac Service Neurodevelopmental Follow-up Programme.昆士兰儿科心脏服务神经发育随访项目的经验教训。
CJC Pediatr Congenit Heart Dis. 2022 May 27;1(3):101-104. doi: 10.1016/j.cjcpc.2022.04.006. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Screening and Evaluation of Neurodevelopmental Impairments in Infants Under 6 Months of Age with Congenital Heart Disease.

本文引用的文献

1
Neurodevelopmental status and follow-up in preschool children with heart disease in London, UK.英国伦敦心脏病患儿的神经发育状况及学龄前随访。
Arch Dis Child. 2021 Mar;106(3):263-271. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317824. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
2
Longitudinal Associations between Neurodevelopment and Psychosocial Health Status in Patients with Repaired D-Transposition of the Great Arteries.法洛四联症根治术后患儿神经发育与心理社会健康状况的纵向关联
J Pediatr. 2019 Jan;204:38-45.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.08.069. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
3
Predictors of quality of life in young adults with congenital heart disease.
6 个月以下先天性心脏病婴儿的神经发育障碍的筛查和评估。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2022 Mar;43(3):489-496. doi: 10.1007/s00246-021-02745-4. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
先天性心脏病青年患者生活质量的预测因素。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2019 Apr 1;5(2):161-168. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcy046.
4
Validation of the Brief Developmental Assessment in pre-school children with heart disease.《简短发育评估在患有心脏病的学龄前儿童中的验证》
Cardiol Young. 2018 Apr;28(4):571-581. doi: 10.1017/S1047951117002773.
5
Development and preliminary testing of the Brief Developmental Assessment: an early recognition tool for children with heart disease.简明发育评估的开发与初步测试:一种用于心脏病患儿的早期识别工具。
Cardiol Young. 2018 Apr;28(4):582-591. doi: 10.1017/S1047951117002918. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
6
Management of children and young people with an acute decrease in conscious level (RCPCH guideline update 2015).意识水平急性下降的儿童和青少年的管理(2015年皇家儿科和儿童健康学院指南更新)
Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2018 Jun;103(3):146-151. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-310574. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
7
Selection by a panel of clinicians and family representatives of important early morbidities associated with paediatric cardiac surgery suitable for routine monitoring using the nominal group technique and a robust voting process.由一组临床医生和家庭代表通过名义群体技术和严格的投票程序,挑选出适合常规监测的与小儿心脏手术相关的重要早期发病情况。
BMJ Open. 2017 May 29;7(5):e014743. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014743.
8
Neuropsychological and Psychiatric Outcomes in Dextro-Transposition of the Great Arteries across the Lifespan: A State-of-the-Art Review.大动脉右位转位患者一生的神经心理学和精神科结局:最新综述
Front Pediatr. 2017 Mar 24;5:59. doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00059. eCollection 2017.
9
The association between brain injury, perioperative anesthetic exposure, and 12-month neurodevelopmental outcomes after neonatal cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study.新生儿心脏手术后脑损伤、围手术期麻醉暴露与12个月神经发育结局之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Mar;24(3):266-74. doi: 10.1111/pan.12350.
10
New white matter brain injury after infant heart surgery is associated with diagnostic group and the use of circulatory arrest.婴儿心脏手术后出现新的脑白质损伤与诊断组别和使用循环阻断术相关。
Circulation. 2013 Mar 5;127(9):971-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001089. Epub 2013 Jan 31.