• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估和调查疑似骨和腹部肿瘤的儿童:一项电子德尔菲共识过程。

Assessing and investigating children with suspected bone and abdominal tumours: an e-Delphi consensus process.

机构信息

Lifespan and Population Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Lifespan and Population Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023 Mar;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001771.

DOI:10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001771
PMID:36868779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9990668/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence of childhood cancer has risen by 15% since the 1990s. Early diagnosis is key to optimising outcomes, however diagnostic delays are widely reported. Presenting symptoms are often non-specific causing a diagnostic dilemma for clinicians. This Delphi consensus process was conducted to develop a new clinical guideline for children and young people presenting with signs/symptoms suggestive of a bone or abdominal tumour.

METHODS

Invitation emails were sent to primary and secondary healthcare professionals to join the Delphi panel. 65 statements were derived from evidence review by a multidisciplinary team. Participants were asked to rank their level of agreement with each statement on a 9-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree, 9=strongly agree), with responses ≥7 taken to indicate agreement. Statements not reaching consensus were rewritten and reissued in a subsequent round.

RESULTS

All statements achieved consensus after two rounds. 96/133 (72%) participants responded to round 1 (R1) and 69/96 (72%) completed round 2 (R2). 62/65 (94%) statements achieved consensus in R1 with 29/65 (47%) gaining more than 90% consensus. Three statements did not reach consensus scoring between 61% and 69%. All reached numerical consensus at the end of R2. Strong consensus was reached on best practice of conducting the consultation, acknowledging parental instinct and obtaining telephone advice from a paediatrician to decide the timing and place of review, rather than adult cancer urgent referral pathways. Dissensus in statements was due to unachievable targets within primary care and valid concerns over a potential overinvestigation of abdominal pain.

CONCLUSIONS

This consensus process has consolidated statements that will be included in a new clinical guideline for suspected bone and abdominal tumours for use in both primary and secondary care. This evidence base will be translated into awareness tools for the public as part of the Child Cancer Smart national awareness campaign.

摘要

背景

自 20 世纪 90 年代以来,儿童癌症的发病率上升了 15%。早期诊断是优化治疗效果的关键,然而诊断延迟的情况广泛存在。儿童癌症的早期症状往往不具有特异性,这给临床医生带来了诊断难题。本德尔菲共识过程旨在为出现疑似骨或腹部肿瘤症状的儿童和青少年制定新的临床指南。

方法

向初级和二级保健专业人员发送邀请电子邮件,邀请他们加入德尔菲小组。65 项声明是由多学科团队对证据进行审查后得出的。参与者被要求在 9 分制李克特量表上对每个声明的同意程度进行评分(1=强烈不同意,9=强烈同意),得分≥7 表示同意。未达成共识的声明被重新编写并在下一轮中重新发布。

结果

两轮后所有声明均达成共识。第一轮(R1)有 133 名参与者中的 96 名(72%)做出了回应,69 名/96 名(72%)完成了第二轮(R2)。R1 中有 62/65(94%)项声明达成共识,其中 29/65(47%)项声明获得了超过 90%的共识。有 3 项声明的得分在 61%至 69%之间,未达成共识。在 R2 结束时,所有声明均达到了数值共识。在进行咨询、承认父母本能以及从儿科医生处获得电话建议以决定评估的时间和地点,而不是采用成人癌症紧急转诊途径方面达成了强烈共识。在声明中存在分歧是因为在初级保健中难以实现既定目标,以及对潜在过度调查腹痛的合理担忧。

结论

本共识过程整合了将包含在疑似骨和腹部肿瘤新临床指南中的声明,供初级和二级保健使用。该证据基础将被转化为公众意识工具,作为儿童癌症智慧国家宣传活动的一部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ede/9990668/d7fb803ddd28/bmjpo-2022-001771f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ede/9990668/5a43fc1bc68d/bmjpo-2022-001771f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ede/9990668/b33cf27dcd1d/bmjpo-2022-001771f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ede/9990668/fb0624f65300/bmjpo-2022-001771f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ede/9990668/fa4e82ee5c1b/bmjpo-2022-001771f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ede/9990668/d7fb803ddd28/bmjpo-2022-001771f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ede/9990668/5a43fc1bc68d/bmjpo-2022-001771f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ede/9990668/b33cf27dcd1d/bmjpo-2022-001771f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ede/9990668/fb0624f65300/bmjpo-2022-001771f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ede/9990668/fa4e82ee5c1b/bmjpo-2022-001771f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ede/9990668/d7fb803ddd28/bmjpo-2022-001771f05.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing and investigating children with suspected bone and abdominal tumours: an e-Delphi consensus process.评估和调查疑似骨和腹部肿瘤的儿童:一项电子德尔菲共识过程。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023 Mar;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001771.
2
Development of the consensus-based recommendations for Podiatry care of Neuropathy In Cancer Survivors (PodNICS): a Delphi consensus study of Australian podiatrists.基于共识的癌症幸存者神经病变足部护理推荐意见的制定(PodNICS):澳大利亚足病医生的 Delphi 共识研究。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2023 Jun 9;16(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00632-0.
3
Insight from an Italian Delphi Consensus on EVAR feasibility outside the instruction for use: the SAFE EVAR Study.意大利关于在使用说明之外进行腔内修复术(EVAR)可行性的德尔菲共识见解:SAFE EVAR研究
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2024 Jun;65(3):273-279. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12906-5. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
4
An International Collaborative Consensus Statement on En Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumour Incorporating Two Systematic Reviews, a Two-round Delphi Survey, and a Consensus Meeting.国际协作共识声明:整块切除膀胱肿瘤,包含两项系统评价、两轮德尔菲调查和一次共识会议。
Eur Urol. 2020 Oct;78(4):546-569. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.04.059. Epub 2020 May 8.
5
Medication appropriateness tool for co-morbid health conditions in dementia: consensus recommendations from a multidisciplinary expert panel.痴呆症共病健康状况的药物适宜性工具:多学科专家小组的共识建议
Intern Med J. 2016 Oct;46(10):1189-1197. doi: 10.1111/imj.13215.
6
Use of Bone Marrow Concentrate to Treat Pain and Musculoskeletal Disorders: An Academic Delphi Investigation.使用骨髓浓缩物治疗疼痛和肌肉骨骼疾病:一项学术德尔菲调查。
Pain Physician. 2021 May;24(3):263-273.
7
Pedi-R-MAPP: The development of a nutritional awareness tool for use in remote paediatric consultations using a modified Delphi consensus.儿童远程医疗营养评估工具(Pedi-R-MAPP):使用改良 Delphi 共识开发的用于远程儿科咨询的营养意识工具。
Clin Nutr. 2022 Mar;41(3):661-672. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.01.009. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
8
Consensus on the exercise and dosage variables of an exercise training programme for chronic non-specific neck pain: protocol for an international e-Delphi study.慢性非特异性颈痛运动训练方案的运动和剂量变量共识:一项国际电子 Delphi 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 May 15;10(5):e037656. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037656.
9
Framework and components for effective discharge planning system: a Delphi methodology.有效的出院计划系统的框架和组成部分:德尔菲法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Nov 14;12:396. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-396.
10
Diagnosis and treatment of Chiari malformation type 1 in children: the International Consensus Document.儿童 Chiari 畸形 1 型的诊断和治疗:国际共识文件。
Neurol Sci. 2022 Feb;43(2):1311-1326. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05317-9. Epub 2021 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Childhood bone tumours in primary care: helping GPs to identify 'the needle in the haystack'.基层医疗中的儿童骨肿瘤:帮助全科医生识别“大海捞针”之物。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Jul 27;73(733):377-379. doi: 10.3399/bjgp23X734673. Print 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
International Comparisons of Clinical Demographics and Outcomes in the International Society of Pediatric Oncology Wilms Tumor 2001 Trial and Study.国际儿科肿瘤学会 2001 年肾母细胞瘤临床试验和研究的临床特征和结局的国际比较。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2022 May;8:e2100425. doi: 10.1200/GO.21.00425.
2
Parent's perspectives of the pathway to diagnosis of childhood cancer: a matter of diagnostic triage.父母对儿童癌症诊断途径的看法:诊断分诊问题
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 22;20(1):969. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05821-2.
3
Accelerating diagnosis for childhood brain tumours: an analysis of the HeadSmart UK population data.
加速儿童脑肿瘤诊断:英国 HeadSmart 人群数据分析。
Arch Dis Child. 2020 Apr;105(4):355-362. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315962. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
4
Delphi method to identify expert opinion to support children's cancer referral guidelines.德尔菲法鉴定专家意见以支持儿童癌症转诊指南。
Arch Dis Child. 2020 Mar;105(3):241-246. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317235. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
5
Diagnostic timeliness in adolescents and young adults with cancer: a cross-sectional analysis of the BRIGHTLIGHT cohort.青少年和青年癌症患者的诊断及时性:BRIGHTLIGHT 队列的横断面分析。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018 Mar;2(3):180-190. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30004-X.
6
Evidence for a delay in diagnosis of Wilms' tumour in the UK compared with Germany: implications for primary care for children.与德国相比,英国威尔姆斯瘤诊断延迟的证据:对儿童初级保健的影响。
Arch Dis Child. 2016 May;101(5):417-20. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309212. Epub 2016 Mar 6.
7
A new clinical guideline from the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health with a national awareness campaign accelerates brain tumor diagnosis in UK children--"HeadSmart: Be Brain Tumour Aware".英国皇家儿科学会与儿童健康学会发布的一项新临床指南,以及一场全国性宣传活动,加快了对英国儿童脑瘤的诊断——“明智头脑:关注脑瘤”。
Neuro Oncol. 2016 Mar;18(3):445-54. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov187. Epub 2015 Nov 1.
8
A systematic review of time to diagnosis in children and young adults with cancer.儿童和青年癌症患者诊断时间的系统评价。
Arch Dis Child. 2013 May;98(5):349-55. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-303034. Epub 2013 Mar 9.
9
AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care.《AGREE II:推进卫生保健领域的指南制定、报告与评估》
CMAJ. 2010 Dec 14;182(18):E839-42. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090449. Epub 2010 Jul 5.
10
Diagnosis delays in childhood cancer: a review.儿童癌症的诊断延误:综述
Cancer. 2007 Aug 15;110(4):703-13. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22849.