• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of FAmily CEntered (FACE®) Advance Care Planning on Longitudinal Congruence in End-of-Life Treatment Preferences: A Randomized Clinical Trial.家庭为中心的(FACE®)预立医疗照护计划对终末期治疗偏好纵向一致性的影响:一项随机临床试验。
AIDS Behav. 2020 Dec;24(12):3359-3375. doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02909-y.
2
Advance Care Planning-Complex and Working: Longitudinal Trajectory of Congruence in End-of-Life Treatment Preferences: An RCT.预先护理计划——复杂且有效:临终治疗偏好一致性的纵向轨迹:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Jun;38(6):634-643. doi: 10.1177/1049909121991807. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
3
A randomized clinical trial of adolescents with HIV/AIDS: pediatric advance care planning.一项针对感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病青少年的随机临床试验:儿科预先护理计划。
AIDS Care. 2017 Oct;29(10):1287-1296. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2017.1308463. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
4
Effect of the Family-Centered Advance Care Planning for Teens with Cancer Intervention on Sustainability of Congruence About End-of-Life Treatment Preferences: A Randomized Clinical Trial.以家庭为中心的青少年癌症预先照护计划对维持末期治疗意愿共识的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2220696. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.20696.
5
FAmily CEntered (FACE) advance care planning: Study design and methods for a patient-centered communication and decision-making intervention for patients with HIV/AIDS and their surrogate decision-makers.以家庭为中心的(FACE)预先护理计划:针对艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者及其替代决策者的以患者为中心的沟通与决策干预措施的研究设计与方法
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Jul;43:172-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
6
FAmily-CEntered (FACE) Advance Care Planning Among African-American and Non-African-American Adults Living With HIV in Washington, DC: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Documentation and Health Equity.家庭为中心的(FACE)预先医疗照护计划在华盛顿特区的 HIV 阳性非裔美国人和非非裔美国人中的应用:一项为增加记录和健康公平性而进行的随机对照试验。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Mar;57(3):607-616. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
7
Pediatric advance care planning (pACP) for teens with cancer and their families: Design of a dyadic, longitudinal RCCT.针对患有癌症的青少年及其家庭的儿科预先护理计划(pACP):一项二元纵向随机对照临床试验的设计
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Nov;62:121-129. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.08.016. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
8
Who will speak for me? Improving end-of-life decision-making for adolescents with HIV and their families.谁会为我发声?改善感染艾滋病毒青少年及其家庭的临终决策。
Pediatrics. 2009 Feb;123(2):e199-206. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2379.
9
Advance care planning and end-of-life decision making in dialysis: a randomized controlled trial targeting patients and their surrogates.透析中的预先护理计划与临终决策:一项针对患者及其代理人的随机对照试验。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Nov;66(5):813-22. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.05.018. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
10
Family-centered advance care planning for teens with cancer.以家庭为中心的癌症青少年超前医疗照护计划。
JAMA Pediatr. 2013 May;167(5):460-7. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.943.

引用本文的文献

1
"Call 911 - That's my [Advance Care] Plan": Factors that Inform Advance Care Planning Conversation Readiness Among Aging Persons Living With HIV.拨打 911-这是我的[预嘱]计划:影响老年 HIV 感染者进行预嘱相关谈话准备的因素。
J Appl Gerontol. 2024 Aug;43(8):1156-1164. doi: 10.1177/07334648241233377. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
2
Advanced HIV disease and health-related suffering-exploring the unmet need of palliative care.艾滋病晚期和与健康相关的痛苦——探索姑息治疗的未满足需求。
Lancet HIV. 2023 Feb;10(2):e126-e133. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(22)00295-8. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
3
Advance Care Planning in Serious Illness: A Narrative Review.重病预先医疗指示计划:叙述性评论。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Jan;65(1):e63-e78. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
4
An Intervention in Congruence for End-of-Life Treatment Preference: A Randomized Trial.《终末治疗偏好一致性干预:一项随机试验》。
Pediatrics. 2022 May 1;149(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-054796.
5
Complex advance care planning interventions for chronic serious illness: how do they work: a scoping review.针对慢性重症疾病的复杂预立医疗计划干预措施:其作用机制如何:一项范围综述
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Oct 5;12(e3):e441-50. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003310.
6
'The Woman Gives': Exploring gender and relationship factors in HIV advance care planning among African American caregivers.“女性付出”:探索非裔美国护理人员在艾滋病毒晚期护理规划中的性别与关系因素
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Aug;30(15-16):2331-2347. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15772. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
7
Advance Care Planning-Complex and Working: Longitudinal Trajectory of Congruence in End-of-Life Treatment Preferences: An RCT.预先护理计划——复杂且有效:临终治疗偏好一致性的纵向轨迹:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Jun;38(6):634-643. doi: 10.1177/1049909121991807. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
8
What Do Adults With HIV Want? End-of-Life Care Goals, Values and Beliefs by Gender, Race, Sexual Orientation.感染艾滋病毒的成年人想要什么?按性别、种族、性取向划分的临终护理目标、价值观和信仰
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Jun;38(6):610-617. doi: 10.1177/1049909120988282. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
9
A mixed-methods exploration of faith, spirituality, and health program interest among older African Americans with HIV.一项针对老年感染艾滋病毒的非裔美国人对信仰、精神性和健康项目兴趣的混合方法探索。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Feb;30(2):507-519. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02656-6. Epub 2020 Oct 14.

本文引用的文献

1
The Role of Religiousness and Spirituality in Health-related Quality of Life of Persons Living with HIV: A Latent Class Analysis.宗教信仰和精神性在艾滋病毒感染者健康相关生活质量中的作用:一项潜在类别分析。
Psycholog Relig Spiritual. 2020 Nov;12(4):494-504. doi: 10.1037/rel0000301. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
2
Advance care planning and longer survival in the terminally ill: a randomised controlled trial unexpected finding.临终患者的预立医疗照护计划与更长生存期:一项随机对照试验的意外发现。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Jun;10(2):221-222. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001906. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
3
FAmily-CEntered (FACE) Advance Care Planning Among African-American and Non-African-American Adults Living With HIV in Washington, DC: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Documentation and Health Equity.家庭为中心的(FACE)预先医疗照护计划在华盛顿特区的 HIV 阳性非裔美国人和非非裔美国人中的应用:一项为增加记录和健康公平性而进行的随机对照试验。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Mar;57(3):607-616. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
4
Interventions Guiding Advance Care Planning Conversations: A Systematic Review.干预措施指导预先医疗照护计划的讨论:系统评价。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Mar;20(3):227-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.09.014. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
5
A randomised controlled trial of an advance care planning intervention for patients with incurable cancer.一项针对不可治愈癌症患者的预先医疗照护计划干预的随机对照试验。
Br J Cancer. 2018 Nov;119(10):1182-1190. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0303-7. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
6
Advance Care Planning and HIV Symptoms in Adolescence.预先医疗照护计划和青少年艾滋病症状。
Pediatrics. 2018 Nov;142(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3869. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
7
Non-AIDS Mortality Is Higher Among Successfully Treated People Living with HIV Compared with Matched HIV-Negative Control Persons: A 15-Year Follow-Up Cohort Study in Sweden.在瑞典开展的一项为期 15 年的随访队列研究显示,与匹配的 HIV 阴性对照者相比,成功接受治疗的 HIV 感染者的非艾滋病死亡率更高。
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2018 Aug;32(8):297-305. doi: 10.1089/apc.2018.0015.
8
Palliative care as an essential component of the HIV care continuum.缓和医疗是艾滋病护理连续体的重要组成部分。
Lancet HIV. 2018 Sep;5(9):e524-e530. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30110-3. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
9
Overview of Systematic Reviews of Advance Care Planning: Summary of Evidence and Global Lessons.系统评价预先医疗照护计划的概述:证据总结与全球经验教训。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Sep;56(3):436-459.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.05.016. Epub 2018 May 25.
10
Correlates of Patterns of Health Values of African Americans Living With HIV/AIDS: Implications for Advance Care Planning and HIV Palliative Care.非裔美国人感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病者健康价值观模式的相关因素:对预先医疗指示和艾滋病毒姑息治疗的启示。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Jul;56(1):53-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.02.020. Epub 2018 Mar 8.

家庭为中心的(FACE®)预立医疗照护计划对终末期治疗偏好纵向一致性的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Effect of FAmily CEntered (FACE®) Advance Care Planning on Longitudinal Congruence in End-of-Life Treatment Preferences: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Children's National, Center for Translational Research/Children's Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.

George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

AIDS Behav. 2020 Dec;24(12):3359-3375. doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02909-y.

DOI:10.1007/s10461-020-02909-y
PMID:32399799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7699823/
Abstract

Trial tested effect of advance care planning on family/surrogates' understanding of patients' end-of-life treatment preferences longitudinally. A multisite, assessor-blinded, intent-to-treat, parallel-group, randomized controlled clinical trial in five hospital-based HIV clinics enrolled 449 participants aged 22 to 77 years during October 2013-March 2017. Patients living with HIV/family dyads were randomized at 2:1 ratio to 2 weekly ~ 60-min sessions either ACP (n = 155 dyads)-(1) ACP facilitated conversation, (2) Advance directive completion; or Control (n = 68 dyads)-(1) Developmental/relationship history, (2) Nutrition/exercise tips. ACP families/surrogates were more likely to accurately report patients' treatment preferences at Time 1 (T) and 12 months post-intervention (T) compared to controls, experiencing high congruence longitudinally (high→high transition), [63·6% vs 37·7% (difference = 25·9%, 95% CI: 11·3%, 40·4%, χ = 11·52, p = 0·01)], even as patients' preferences changed over time. ACP families/surrogates had eight times the odds of controls of having an excellent understanding of patients' treatment preferences (Adjusted Odds Ratio 7.91, 95%CI: 3.08, 20.3). Conversations matter.

摘要

该试验旨在长期评估预先医疗照护计划对家属/代理人理解患者临终治疗偏好的效果。这是一项多中心、评估者设盲、意向治疗、平行组、随机对照临床试验,于 2013 年 10 月至 2017 年 3 月在 5 家医院艾滋病门诊共纳入了 449 名年龄在 22 至 77 岁之间的患者及其家属/代理人。将携带 HIV 的患者及其家属/代理人按 2:1 的比例随机分配至 2 周 1 次、每次 60 分钟的 ACP(n=155 对)或对照组(n=68 对)。ACP 组接受以下两种干预措施:(1)促进对话;(2)预先医疗指示完成。对照组接受以下两种干预措施:(1)发展/关系史;(2)营养/运动建议。与对照组相比,接受 ACP 的家庭/代理人在 T1(基线)和干预后 12 个月(T)时更有可能准确报告患者的治疗偏好,且表现出较高的一致性(高→高转换),[63.6%比 37.7%(差值为 25.9%,95%CI:11.3%,40.4%,χ²=11.52,p=0.01)],即使患者的偏好随时间发生变化。调整后,ACP 组家庭/代理人对患者治疗偏好有极好理解的可能性是对照组的 8 倍(调整后的优势比为 7.91,95%CI:3.08,20.3)。对话很重要。