Knoblauch Kenneth, Marsh-Armstrong Brennan, Werner John S
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2020 Apr 1;37(4):A133-A144. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.380088.
Maximum likelihood difference scaling was used to measure suprathreshold contrast response difference scales for low-frequency Gabor patterns, modulated along luminance and L-M color directions in normal, protanomalous, and deuteranomalous observers. Based on a signal-detection model, perceptual scale values, parameterized as $ d^\prime $d, were estimated by maximum likelihood. The difference scales were well fit by a Michaelis-Menten model, permitting estimates of response and contrast gain parameters for each subject. Anomalous observers showed no significant differences in response or contrast gain from normal observers for luminance contrast. For chromatic modulation, however, anomalous observers displayed higher contrast and lower response gain compared to normal observers. These effects cannot be explained by simple pigment shift models, and they support a compensation mechanism to optimize the mapping of the input contrast range to the neural response range. A linear relation between response and contrast gain suggests a neural trade-off between them.
采用最大似然差异缩放法来测量正常观察者、红色弱观察者和绿色弱观察者中沿亮度和L-M颜色方向调制的低频Gabor图案的阈上对比度响应差异量表。基于信号检测模型,通过最大似然估计参数化为(d^\prime)的感知量表值。差异量表通过米氏模型得到了很好的拟合,从而可以估计每个受试者的响应和对比度增益参数。红色弱和绿色弱观察者在亮度对比度方面的响应或对比度增益与正常观察者没有显著差异。然而,对于颜色调制,与正常观察者相比,红色弱和绿色弱观察者表现出更高的对比度和更低的响应增益。这些效应不能用简单的色素转移模型来解释,它们支持一种补偿机制,以优化输入对比度范围到神经响应范围的映射。响应和对比度增益之间的线性关系表明它们之间存在神经权衡。