Li Li, Huang Jia, Wu Jingsong, Jiang Cai, Chen Shanjia, Xie Guanli, Ren Jinxin, Tao Jing, Chan Chetwyn C H, Chen Lidian, Wong Alex W K
College of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Key Laboratory of Orthopedics & Traumatology of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Rehabilitation, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ministry of Education, Fuzhou, China.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 May 13;8(5):e17219. doi: 10.2196/17219.
Monitoring the functional status of poststroke patients after they transition home is significant for rehabilitation. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies may provide an opportunity to reach and follow patients post discharge. However, the feasibility and validity of functional assessments administered by mHealth technologies are unknown.
This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, validity, and reliability of functional assessments administered through the videoconference function of a mobile phone-based app compared with administration through the telephone function in poststroke patients after rehabilitation hospitalization.
A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a rehabilitation hospital in Southeast China. Participants were randomly assigned to either a videoconference follow-up (n=60) or a telephone follow-up (n=60) group. We measured the functional status of participants in each group at 2-week and 3-month follow-up periods. Half the participants in each group were followed by face-to-face home visit assessments as the gold standard. Validity was assessed by comparing any score differences between videoconference follow-up and home visit assessments, as well as telephone follow-up and home visit assessments. Reliability was assessed by computing agreements between videoconference follow-up and home visit assessments, as well as telephone follow-up and home visit assessments. Feasibility was evaluated by the levels of completion, satisfaction, comfort, and confidence in the 2 groups.
Scores obtained from the videoconference follow-up were similar to those of the home visit assessment. However, most scores collected from telephone administration were higher than those of the home visit assessment. The agreement between videoconference follow-up and home visit assessments was higher than that between telephone follow-up and home visit assessments at all follow-up periods. In the telephone follow-up group, completion rates were 95% and 82% at 2-week and 3-month follow-up points, respectively. In the videoconference follow-up group, completion rates were 95% and 80% at 2-week and 3-month follow-up points, respectively. There were no differences in the completion rates between the 2 groups at all follow-up periods (X=1.6, P=.21 for 2-week follow-up; X=1.9, P=.17 for 3-month follow-up). Patients in the videoconference follow-up group perceived higher confidence than those in the telephone follow-up group at both 2-week and 3-month follow-up periods (X=6.7, P=.04 for 2-week follow-up; X=8.0, P=.04 for 3-month follow-up). The videoconference follow-up group demonstrated higher satisfaction than the telephone follow-up group at 3-month follow-up (X=13.9; P=.03).
The videoconference follow-up assessment of functional status demonstrates higher validity and reliability, as well as higher confidence and satisfaction perceived by patients, than the telephone assessment. The videoconference assessment provides an efficient means of assessing functional outcomes of patients after hospital discharge. This method provides a novel solution for clinical trials requiring longitudinal assessments.
chictr.org.cn: ChiCTR1900027626; http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=44831&htm=4.
监测中风患者回家后的功能状态对康复至关重要。移动健康(mHealth)技术可能为出院后联系和跟踪患者提供机会。然而,mHealth技术进行功能评估的可行性和有效性尚不清楚。
本研究旨在评估与通过电话功能进行评估相比,基于手机应用程序的视频会议功能对中风康复住院患者进行功能评估的可行性、有效性和可靠性。
在中国东南部的一家康复医院进行了一项随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配到视频会议随访组(n = 60)或电话随访组(n = 60)。我们在2周和3个月的随访期测量了每组参与者的功能状态。每组一半的参与者接受面对面家访评估作为金标准。通过比较视频会议随访与家访评估之间以及电话随访与家访评估之间的任何分数差异来评估有效性。通过计算视频会议随访与家访评估之间以及电话随访与家访评估之间的一致性来评估可靠性。通过两组的完成水平、满意度、舒适度和信心来评估可行性。
视频会议随访获得的分数与家访评估的分数相似。然而,通过电话评估收集的大多数分数高于家访评估的分数。在所有随访期,视频会议随访与家访评估之间的一致性高于电话随访与家访评估之间的一致性。在电话随访组中,2周和3个月随访点的完成率分别为95%和82%。在视频会议随访组中,2周和3个月随访点的完成率分别为95%和80%。在所有随访期两组的完成率没有差异(2周随访时X = 1.6,P = 0.21;3个月随访时X = 1.9,P = 0.17)。在2周和3个月随访期,视频会议随访组的患者比电话随访组的患者感知到更高的信心(2周随访时X = 6.7,P = 0.04;3个月随访时X = 8.0,P = 0.04)。在3个月随访时,视频会议随访组的满意度高于电话随访组(X = 13.9;P = 0.03)。
与电话评估相比,功能状态的视频会议随访评估具有更高的有效性和可靠性,以及患者更高的信心和满意度。视频会议评估提供了一种评估出院后患者功能结局的有效方法。这种方法为需要纵向评估的临床试验提供了一种新的解决方案。
chictr.org.cn:ChiCTR1900027626;http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=44831&htm=4。