Suppr超能文献

经支气管超声引导针吸活检术在非肿瘤性孤立性胸内淋巴结病患者中的作用:临床实践中的常见难题。

The role of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in isolated intrathoracic lymphadenopathy in non-neoplastic patients: a common dilemma in clinical practice.

机构信息

Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Bras Pneumol. 2020;46(2):e20180183. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20180183. Epub 2020 May 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic yield of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in non-neoplastic patients with isolated intrathoracic lymphadenopathy (IL).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients with isolated IL referred for EBUS-TBNA. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of granulomatous, reactive, and neoplastic lymphadenopathy. In cases of nonspecific granulomas, reactive lymphadenopathy, or inconclusive results, a definitive diagnosis was established by other diagnostic procedures or during a follow-up period of at least 18 months.

RESULTS

Among the 58 patients included in the study, EBUS-TBNA established a diagnosis of granulomatous disease in 22 (38%), reactive lymphadenopathy in 15 (26%), cancer in 8 (14%), and other diseases in 3 (5%). Results were inconclusive in 10 (17%), the diagnosis being established by other bronchoscopic procedures in 2 (20%) and by surgical procedures in 8 (80%). A final diagnosis of reactive lymphadenopathy was established in 12. Of those, 11 (92%) had their diagnosis confirmed during follow-up and 1 (8%) had their diagnosis confirmed by mediastinoscopy. In another 3, a final diagnosis of sarcoidosis or neoplasm was established. For the diagnosis of granulomatous disease, neoplasms, and reactive lymphadenopathy, EBUS-TBNA was found to have a sensitivity of 73%, 68%, and 92%, respectively; a specificity of 100%, 100%, and 93%, respectively; an accuracy of 86%, 93%, and 93%, respectively; a PPV of 100%, 100%, and 80%, respectively; and an NPV of 78%, 92%, and 98%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In non-neoplastic patients, granulomatous disease and reactive lymphadenopathy appear to be common causes of isolated IL. EBUS-TBNA shows promising results as a first-line minimally invasive diagnostic procedure. The results obtained by EBUS-TBNA can be optimized by examining clinical and radiological findings during follow-up or by comparison with the results obtained with other bronchoscopic methods.

摘要

目的

确定经支气管超声引导针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)在孤立性胸内淋巴结病(IL)的非肿瘤患者中的诊断效果。

方法

这是一项对因孤立性 IL 而接受 EBUS-TBNA 的患者进行的回顾性研究。我们计算了 EBUS-TBNA 对肉芽肿性、反应性和肿瘤性淋巴结病的诊断的灵敏度、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。在非特异性肉芽肿、反应性淋巴结病或结果不确定的情况下,通过其他诊断程序或至少 18 个月的随访期来确定明确诊断。

结果

在纳入研究的 58 例患者中,EBUS-TBNA 确定 22 例(38%)为肉芽肿性疾病,15 例(26%)为反应性淋巴结病,8 例(14%)为癌症,3 例(5%)为其他疾病。10 例(17%)结果不确定,其中 2 例(20%)通过其他支气管镜检查程序,8 例(80%)通过手术程序确定诊断。最终诊断为反应性淋巴结病 12 例。其中,11 例(92%)在随访中得到确认,1 例(8%)通过纵隔镜检查得到确认。另外 3 例最终诊断为结节病或肿瘤。对于肉芽肿性疾病、肿瘤和反应性淋巴结病的诊断,EBUS-TBNA 的灵敏度分别为 73%、68%和 92%;特异性分别为 100%、100%和 93%;准确性分别为 86%、93%和 93%;PPV 分别为 100%、100%和 80%;NPV 分别为 78%、92%和 98%。

结论

在非肿瘤患者中,肉芽肿性疾病和反应性淋巴结病似乎是孤立性 IL 的常见原因。EBUS-TBNA 作为一种一线微创诊断程序显示出良好的效果。通过在随访过程中检查临床和影像学发现,或与其他支气管镜方法的结果进行比较,可优化 EBUS-TBNA 的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eea8/7462701/fc969b545594/1806-3713-jbpneu-46-02-e20180183-gf1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验