• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉内膜切除术期间各种脑电图变化对检测 30 天围手术期卒中的诊断准确性:系统评价。

Diagnostic accuracy of various EEG changes during carotid endarterectomy to detect 30-day perioperative stroke: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Jul;131(7):1508-1516. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.03.037. Epub 2020 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2020.03.037
PMID:32403063
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We assessed whether significant intraoperative electroencephalography (EEG) changes have predictive value for perioperative stroke within 30 days after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) procedures for carotid stenosis (CS) patients. We also assessed the diagnostic accuracy of various EEG changes in predicting perioperative stroke.

METHODS

We searched databases for reports with outcomes of CS patients who underwent CEA with intraoperative EEG monitoring. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of EEG changes for predicting perioperative stroke. Sensitivity and specificity were presented with forest plots and a summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 10,672 patients. Intraoperative EEG changes predicted 30-day stroke with a sensitivity of 46% (95% CI, 38-54%) and specificity of 86% (95% CI, 83-88%). The estimated DOR was 5.79 (95% CI, 3.86-8.69). The estimated DOR for reversible and irreversible EEG changes were 8.25 (95% CI, 3.34-20.34) and 70.84 (95% CI, 36.01-139.37), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative EEG changes have high specificity but modest sensitivity for predicting perioperative stroke following CEA. Patients with irreversible EEG changes are at high risk for perioperative stroke.

SIGNIFICANCE

Intraoperative EEG changes can help surgeons predict the risk of perioperative stroke for CS patients following CEA.

摘要

目的

我们评估了颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)治疗颈动脉狭窄(CS)患者围手术期 30 天内,术中脑电图(EEG)显著变化是否对术后卒中具有预测价值。我们还评估了各种 EEG 变化预测围手术期卒中的诊断准确性。

方法

我们在数据库中搜索了接受术中 EEG 监测的 CEA 治疗 CS 患者的结局报告。我们计算了 EEG 变化预测围手术期卒中的敏感性、特异性和诊断优势比(DOR)。采用森林图和汇总受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线呈现敏感性和特异性。

结果

荟萃分析纳入了 10672 例患者。术中 EEG 变化预测 30 天卒中的敏感性为 46%(95%CI,38-54%),特异性为 86%(95%CI,83-88%)。估计的 DOR 为 5.79(95%CI,3.86-8.69)。可逆和不可逆 EEG 变化的估计 DOR 分别为 8.25(95%CI,3.34-20.34)和 70.84(95%CI,36.01-139.37)。

结论

术中 EEG 变化对预测 CEA 后围手术期卒中具有高特异性,但敏感性中等。出现不可逆 EEG 变化的患者围手术期卒中风险较高。

意义

术中 EEG 变化可帮助外科医生预测 CEA 治疗 CS 患者围手术期卒中的风险。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of various EEG changes during carotid endarterectomy to detect 30-day perioperative stroke: A systematic review.颈动脉内膜切除术期间各种脑电图变化对检测 30 天围手术期卒中的诊断准确性:系统评价。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Jul;131(7):1508-1516. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.03.037. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
2
Diagnostic accuracy of EEG changes during carotid endarterectomy in predicting perioperative strokes.颈动脉内膜切除术期间脑电图变化对围手术期卒中的诊断准确性
J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Mar;25:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.08.014. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
3
Predictors of cross-clamp-induced intraoperative monitoring changes during carotid endarterectomy using both electroencephalography and somatosensory evoked potentials.使用脑电图和体感诱发电位预测颈动脉内膜切除术期间夹闭引起的术中监测变化。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;67(1):191-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.064. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of somatosensory evoked potential and electroencephalography during carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术期间体感诱发电位和脑电图的诊断准确性
Neurol Res. 2016 Aug;38(8):698-705. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2016.1200707. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
5
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials and Electroencephalography during Carotid Endarterectomy Predict Late Stroke but not Death.颈动脉内膜切除术期间的体感诱发电位和脑电图可预测晚期中风,但不能预测死亡。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Jan;38:105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.07.064. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
6
Predicting transient ischemic attack after carotid endarterectomy: The role of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.预测颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后的短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA):术中神经生理监测的作用。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2022 Sep;141:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.06.010. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
7
Perioperative stroke after carotid endarterectomy: etiology and implications.颈动脉内膜切除术后围手术期卒中:病因及影响
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Dec;158(12):2377-2383. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2966-2. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
8
Diagnostic value of somatosensory evoked potential changes during carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.颈动脉内膜切除术期间体感诱发电位变化的诊断价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2015 Jan;72(1):73-80. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.3071.
9
Is Two Really Better Than One? Examining the Superiority of Dual Modality Neurophysiological Monitoring During Carotid Endarterectomy: A Meta-Analysis.两个真的比一个好吗?颈动脉内膜切除术中双模式神经生理监测优势的研究:一项荟萃分析
World Neurosurg. 2015 Dec;84(6):1941-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.08.040. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
10
Diagnostic value of somatosensory evoked potential changes during carotid endarterectomy for 30-day perioperative stroke.颈动脉内膜切除术期间体感诱发电位变化对术后 30 天内卒中的诊断价值。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Sep;129(9):1819-1831. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.05.018. Epub 2018 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Anesthesia-induced electroencephalogram oscillations and perioperative outcomes in older adults undergoing cardiac surgery.老年心脏手术患者麻醉诱导脑电图振荡与围手术期结局
J Clin Anesth. 2025 Mar;102:111770. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111770. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
2
Intraoperative neuromonitoring as an independent predictor for postoperative delirium in ICU following aneurysm clipping.术中神经监测作为动脉瘤夹闭术后重症监护病房(ICU)中术后谵妄的独立预测指标。
eNeurologicalSci. 2025 Jan 9;38:100549. doi: 10.1016/j.ensci.2025.100549. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during cardiac surgery: an observational cohort study.
心脏手术期间的术中神经生理监测:一项观察性队列研究。
Open Heart. 2024 Nov 9;11(2):e002939. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002939.
4
Can NIRS be a surrogate indicator of elective shunt in carotid endarterectomy? A single-center observational retrospective study says no.近红外光谱(NIRS)能否成为颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)中选择性分流的替代指标?一项单中心观察性回顾性研究表明不能。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2024 Jun;38(3):631-638. doi: 10.1007/s10877-023-01114-1. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
5
Anesthetic management of carotid endarterectomy: an update from Italian guidelines.颈动脉内膜切除术的麻醉管理:来自意大利指南的更新
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2022 Jun 6;2(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s44158-022-00052-9.
6
Technical note: pre-positioning lower limb SSEP during semi-sitting positioning in posterior fossa surgery- does it matter?技术说明:后颅窝手术半坐位时下肢体感诱发电位的预定位——这重要吗?
J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Dec;37(6):1627-1633. doi: 10.1007/s10877-023-01041-1. Epub 2023 Jun 23.