From the Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), School of Psychiatry, UNSW Sydney, Australia (J.W.L., J.D.C., R.J.C., D.M.L., P.S.S.).
St. Vincent's Medical School, UNSW Sydney, Australia (K.S.).
Stroke. 2020 Jun;51(6):1640-1646. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028428. Epub 2020 May 14.
Background and Purpose- Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is associated with cognitive impairment and an increased risk of dementia, but the association between prediabetes and cognitive impairment is less clear, particularly in a setting of major cerebrovascular events. This article examines the impact of impaired fasting glucose and T2D on cognitive performance in a stroke population. Methods- Seven international observational studies from the STROKOG (Stroke and Cognition) consortium (n=1601; mean age, 66.0 years; 70% Asian, 26% white, and 2.6% African American) were included. Fasting glucose level (FGL) during hospitalization was used to define 3 groups, T2D (FGL ≥7.0 mmol/L), impaired fasting glucose (FGL 6.1-6.9 mmol/L), and normal (FGL <6.1 mmol/L), and a history of diabetes mellitus and the use of a diabetes mellitus medication were also used to support a diagnosis of T2D. Domain and global cognition scores were derived from standardized neuropsychological test scores. The cross-sectional association between glucose status and cognitive performance at 3 to 6 months poststroke was examined using linear mixed models, adjusting for age, sex, education, stroke type, ethnicity, and vascular risk factors. Results- Patients with T2D had significantly poorer performance in global cognition (SD, -0.59 [95% CI, -0.82 to -0.36]; <0.001) and in all domains compared with patients with normal FGL. There was no significant difference between impaired fasting glucose patients and those with normal FGL in global cognition (SD, -0.10 [95% CI, -0.45 to 0.24]; =0.55) or in any cognitive domain. Conclusions- Diabetes mellitus, but not prediabetes, is associated with poorer cognitive performance in patients 3 to 6 months after stroke.
背景与目的-2 型糖尿病(T2D)与认知障碍和痴呆风险增加有关,但前驱糖尿病与认知障碍之间的关系尚不清楚,尤其是在发生重大脑血管事件的情况下。本文研究了空腹血糖受损和 T2D 对卒中人群认知表现的影响。
方法-纳入了来自 STROKOG(卒中与认知)联盟的 7 项国际观察性研究(n=1601;平均年龄 66.0 岁;70%为亚洲人,26%为白人,2.6%为非裔美国人)。住院期间的空腹血糖水平(FGL)用于定义 3 组:T2D(FGL≥7.0mmol/L)、空腹血糖受损(FGL 6.1-6.9mmol/L)和正常(FGL<6.1mmol/L),同时还使用糖尿病病史和糖尿病药物的使用来支持 T2D 的诊断。从标准化神经心理测试评分中得出认知域和总体认知评分。使用线性混合模型,在调整年龄、性别、教育程度、卒中类型、种族和血管危险因素后,检测卒中后 3-6 个月时血糖状况与认知表现之间的横断面关联。
结果-T2D 患者的总体认知表现(标准差,-0.59[95%置信区间,-0.82 至-0.36];<0.001)和所有认知域的表现均明显差于 FGL 正常的患者。空腹血糖受损的患者与 FGL 正常的患者之间在总体认知(标准差,-0.10[95%置信区间,-0.45 至 0.24];=0.55)或任何认知域中均无显著差异。
结论-糖尿病(而非前驱糖尿病)与卒中后 3-6 个月患者的认知表现较差有关。