• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

更新的急诊医学质量和安全框架。

Updated framework on quality and safety in emergency medicine.

机构信息

Emergency Department, Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia

Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2020 Jul;37(7):437-442. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-209290. Epub 2020 May 13.

DOI:10.1136/emermed-2019-209290
PMID:32404345
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7413575/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Quality and safety of emergency care is critical. Patients rely on emergency medicine (EM) for accessible, timely and high-quality care in addition to providing a 'safety-net' function. Demand is increasing, creating resource challenges in all settings. Where EM is well established, this is recognised through the implementation of quality standards and staff training for patient safety. In settings where EM is developing, immense system and patient pressures exist, thereby necessitating the availability of tiered standards appropriate to the local context.

METHODS

The original quality framework arose from expert consensus at the International Federation of Emergency Medicine (IFEM) Symposium for Quality and Safety in Emergency Care (UK, 2011). The IFEM Quality and Safety Special Interest Group members have subsequently refined it to achieve a consensus in 2018.

RESULTS

Patients should expect EDs to provide effective acute care. To do this, trained emergency personnel should make patient-centred, timely and expert decisions to provide care, supported by systems, processes, diagnostics, appropriate equipment and facilities. Enablers to high-quality care include appropriate staff, access to care (including financial), coordinated emergency care through the whole patient journey and monitoring of outcomes. Crowding directly impacts on patient quality of care, morbidity and mortality. Quality indicators should be pragmatic, measurable and prioritised as components of an improvement strategy which should be developed, tailored and implemented in each setting.

CONCLUSION

EDs globally have a remit to deliver the best care possible. IFEM has defined and updated an international consensus framework for quality and safety.

摘要

目的

急诊医疗的质量和安全至关重要。除了提供“安全网”功能外,患者还依赖急诊医学(EM)提供可及、及时和高质量的护理。需求不断增加,在所有环境中都带来了资源挑战。在 EM 得到良好发展的地方,通过实施质量标准和员工培训以确保患者安全,这一点得到了认可。在 EM 发展中的环境中,存在巨大的系统和患者压力,因此需要提供适合当地情况的分层标准。

方法

最初的质量框架源自国际急诊医学联合会(IFEM)质量和安全急诊护理研讨会(英国,2011 年)的专家共识。IFEM 质量和安全特别兴趣小组成员随后对其进行了完善,以在 2018 年达成共识。

结果

患者应该期望急诊科能够提供有效的急性护理。为此,经过培训的急诊人员应该根据系统、流程、诊断、适当的设备和设施,为患者提供以患者为中心、及时和专业的决策。高质量护理的促成因素包括适当的人员、获得护理的机会(包括财务方面)、通过整个患者旅程协调急诊护理以及监测结果。拥挤直接影响患者的护理质量、发病率和死亡率。质量指标应该是务实的、可衡量的,并作为改进策略的组成部分进行优先排序,该策略应在每个环境中制定、定制和实施。

结论

全球的急诊科都有责任提供尽可能好的护理。IFEM 已经定义并更新了一个国际质量和安全共识框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76a8/7413575/86273413d820/emermed-2019-209290f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76a8/7413575/c1297e89bd3b/emermed-2019-209290f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76a8/7413575/25cc7662ae2b/emermed-2019-209290f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76a8/7413575/86273413d820/emermed-2019-209290f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76a8/7413575/c1297e89bd3b/emermed-2019-209290f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76a8/7413575/25cc7662ae2b/emermed-2019-209290f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76a8/7413575/86273413d820/emermed-2019-209290f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Updated framework on quality and safety in emergency medicine.更新的急诊医学质量和安全框架。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Jul;37(7):437-442. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-209290. Epub 2020 May 13.
2
The International Federation for Emergency Medicine framework for quality and safety in the emergency department.国际急诊医学联合会急诊科质量与安全框架
Emerg Med J. 2014 Nov;31(11):926-9. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203000. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
3
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
4
Measuring patient safety in the emergency department.衡量急诊科的患者安全。
Am J Med Qual. 2014 Mar-Apr;29(2):99-104. doi: 10.1177/1062860613489846. Epub 2013 May 31.
5
The International Federation for Emergency Medicine report on emergency department crowding and access block: A brief summary.国际急救医学联合会关于急诊科拥挤和通道阻塞的报告:简要总结。
CJEM. 2021 Jan;23(1):26-28. doi: 10.1007/s43678-020-00065-9. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
6
The International Federation for Emergency Medicine report on emergency department crowding and access block: A brief summary.国际急诊医学联合会关于急诊部门拥挤和通道阻塞的报告:简要总结。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Mar;38(3):245-246. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210716. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
7
Development of key performance indicators for emergency departments in Ireland using an electronic modified-Delphi consensus approach.爱尔兰急诊科关键绩效指标的制定:采用电子改良德尔菲共识法。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;20(2):109-14. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328351e5d8.
8
The International Federation for Emergency Medicine report on emergency department crowding and access block: A brief summary.国际急诊医学联合会关于急诊科拥挤和就诊受阻的报告:简要概述。
Emerg Med Australas. 2021 Feb;33(1):161-163. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13660. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
9
The case for quality improvement in emergency medicine.急诊医学质量改进的理由。
CJEM. 2018 Jan;20(1):9-11. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.373. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
10
Developing outcome, process and balancing measures for an emergency department longitudinal patient monitoring system using a modified Delphi.运用改良德尔菲法为急诊科纵向患者监测系统制定结果、过程及平衡指标。
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Jan 14;19(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12873-018-0220-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcome metrics in recommended performance measurement tools for emergency department performance evaluation: a systematic review.急诊科绩效评估推荐绩效测量工具中的结果指标:一项系统综述。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 16;33(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01442-y.
2
The Swedish National Emergency Registry (SVAR), a modern emergency care registry.瑞典国家急诊登记处(SVAR),一个现代化的急诊护理登记处。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2025 Jun 1;32(3):216-218. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001214. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
3
Validating quality standards in Palestinian emergency departments: An e-Delphi survey approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Template for uniform reporting of emergency department measures, consensus according to the Utstein method.急诊部措施统一报告模板,依据 Utstein 方法达成共识。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;26(6):417-422. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000582.
2
Defining quality indicators for emergency care delivery: findings of an expert consensus process by emergency care practitioners in Africa.确定急诊护理服务的质量指标:非洲急诊护理从业者专家共识过程的结果
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Feb 15;3(1):e000479. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000479. eCollection 2018.
3
The Emergency Medicine Events Register: An analysis of the first 150 incidents entered into a novel, online incident reporting registry.
验证巴勒斯坦急诊科的质量标准:一种电子德尔菲调查方法。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 10;20(1):e0307632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307632. eCollection 2025.
4
Predictive factors in difficult postoperative airway management of severe odontogenic deep neck infection.严重牙源性深部颈部感染术后气道管理困难的预测因素
Odontology. 2024 Dec 14. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-01041-w.
5
Beyond the requirement: A novel patient follow-up report.超越要求:一份新颖的患者随访报告。
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Dec 1;8(6):e11042. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11042. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Development of an Emergency Department Safety Checklist through a global consensus process.通过全球共识程序制定急诊科安全检查表。
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 1. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03760-y.
7
Healthcare delivery to patients from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds in emergency care: a scoping review protocol.在急诊护理中为文化和语言多样化的患者提供医疗服务:范围综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 12;13(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02579-0.
8
Trends in patient safety education research for healthcare professional students over the past two decades: a bibliometric and content analysis.过去二十年中医疗专业学生患者安全教育研究的趋势:文献计量学和内容分析。
Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2358610. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2358610. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
9
Frequency, Prognosis, and Clinical Features of Unexpected versus Expected Cardiac Arrest in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Analysis.急诊科意外与预期心脏骤停的发生率、预后及临床特征:一项回顾性分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 24;13(9):2509. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092509.
10
An Integrative Systematic Review of Promoting Patient Safety Within Prehospital Emergency Medical Services by Paramedics: A Role Theory Perspective.从角色理论视角对护理人员在院前急救医疗服务中促进患者安全的综合系统评价
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Mar 26;17:1385-1400. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S460194. eCollection 2024.
急诊医学事件登记册:对录入一个新型在线事件报告登记库的前150起事件的分析。
Emerg Med Australas. 2016 Oct;28(5):544-50. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12620. Epub 2016 Jul 31.
4
Development of a Hospital Standardized Mortality Ratio for Emergency Department Care.急诊医疗的医院标准化死亡率的制定。
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Apr;67(4):517-524.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
5
Piloting an online incident reporting system in Australasian emergency medicine.在澳大利亚和新西兰急诊医学领域试行在线事件报告系统。
Emerg Med Australas. 2014 Oct;26(5):461-7. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12271. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
6
Review article: what makes a good healthcare quality indicator? A systematic review and validation study.综述文章:什么造就了良好的医疗质量指标?一项系统综述与验证研究。
Emerg Med Australas. 2014 Apr;26(2):113-24. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12195.
7
Enhancing the quality of morbidity and mortality rounds: the Ottawa M&M model.提高住院患者和死亡患者讨论质量:渥太华 M&M 模式。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Mar;21(3):314-21. doi: 10.1111/acem.12330.
8
The relationship between emergency department crowding and patient outcomes: a systematic review.急诊科拥挤与患者结局的关系:系统评价。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2014 Mar;46(2):106-15. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12055. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
9
The International Federation for Emergency Medicine framework for quality and safety in the emergency department.国际急诊医学联合会急诊科质量与安全框架
Emerg Med J. 2014 Nov;31(11):926-9. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203000. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
10
Demand at the emergency department front door: 10-year trends in presentations.急诊科前门的需求:10 年就诊趋势。
Med J Aust. 2012 Feb 6;196:128-32. doi: 10.5694/mja11.10955.