Suppr超能文献

用于第一跖跗关节融合术的生物可吸收螺钉与钛螺钉:一项体外研究。

Bioabsorbable vs. titanium screws for first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis: An in-vitro study.

作者信息

Partio Nikke, Mattila Ville M, Mäenpää Heikki

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tampere University Hospital, P.O. Box 2000, SF-33521, Tampere, Finland.

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere University, Medical School, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 May-Jun;11(3):448-452. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.08.017. Epub 2019 Aug 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The TMT-1 joint arthrodesis is a common repair for severe hallux valgus. Two crossing interfragmental screws, usually titanium or steel, and a locking plate or a plate with a compression screw are the most common fixation methods for first TMT joint arthrodesis. The qualities of an ideal fixation material include adequate strength and rigidity, biocompatibility, lack of interference with bone healing, lack of visibility and palpability, and a low risk of surgical removal. We sought to determine whether bioabsorbable cannulated screws would perform as well as titanium screws in anatomical models.

METHODS

Identical anatomical TMT-1 arthrodesis was created with a saw by making a straight cut in 30 anatomical models (Sawbone®). The bioabsorbable and titanium screws were placed one at a time in exactly the same location in each model according to careful measurements. All 30 models were analyzed with a material testing machine (MTS Insight 30, Eden Prairie, USA). Each model was oriented 15° to the platform to simulate its position to the ground during mid-stance.

RESULTS

In the single-cycle load-to-failure test, the mean yield load was 61.4 N ± 5.7 N (range, 50.1 N-70.3 N) in the bioabsorbable screw group and 81.2 N ± 12 N (range, 61.7 N-113.4 N) in the titanium screw group (P < .001). The respective values for the stiffness of the fixation were 8.1 N/mm ± 0.8 N/mm (range, 6.7 N/mm to 9.1 N/mm) and 9.7 N/mm ± 1.8 N/mm (range, 6.9 N/mm to 12.6 N/mm) for the bioabsorbable and titanium groups (P = .004). The mean maximum failure loads in the bioabsorbable group were 85.1 N ± 8.5 N (range, 67.1 N-97.2 N) and in the titanium group 120.6 N ± 13.2 N (range, 96.7 N-136.7 N), respectively (P < .001). Analysis of the failure models shows bioabsorbable fixation failures caused by bending occur more often than in the titanium group.

CONCLUSION

In biomechanical testing, titanium screws were stronger than bioabsorbable screws in the TMT-1 arthrodesis model tested, although bioabsorbable cannulated screws may be an alternative to titanium screws in the fixation Lapidus procedure.

摘要

背景

第一跖楔关节融合术是重度拇外翻的常见修复方法。两根交叉的骨折间螺钉(通常为钛合金或钢质)以及锁定钢板或带有加压螺钉的钢板是第一跖楔关节融合术最常用的固定方法。理想固定材料的特性包括足够的强度和刚度、生物相容性、不干扰骨愈合、不可见且不可触及,以及手术取出风险低。我们试图确定在解剖模型中,可吸收空心螺钉的性能是否与钛螺钉相同。

方法

使用锯在30个解剖模型(Sawbone®)上进行直线切割,创建相同的解剖学第一跖楔关节融合模型。根据精确测量,将可吸收螺钉和钛螺钉依次放置在每个模型的完全相同位置。所有30个模型均使用材料试验机(美国伊登草原市的MTS Insight 30)进行分析。每个模型与平台呈15°角,以模拟其在站立中期相对于地面的位置。

结果

在单周期破坏载荷试验中,可吸收螺钉组的平均屈服载荷为61.4 N±5.7 N(范围为50.1 N - 70.3 N),钛螺钉组为81.2 N±12 N(范围为61.7 N - 113.4 N)(P <.001)。可吸收螺钉组和钛螺钉组固定刚度的相应值分别为8.1 N/mm±0.8 N/mm(范围为6.7 N/mm至9.1 N/mm)和9.7 N/mm±1.8 N/mm(范围为6.9 N/mm至12.6 N/mm)(P =.004)。可吸收组的平均最大破坏载荷为85.1 N±8.5 N(范围为67.1 N - 97.2 N),钛组为120.6 N±13.2 N(范围为96.7 N - 136.7 N),分别(P <.001)。对破坏模型的分析表明,可吸收固定因弯曲导致的失败比钛组更常见。

结论

在生物力学测试中,在所测试的第一跖楔关节融合模型中,钛螺钉比可吸收螺钉更强,尽管在Lapidus手术固定中,可吸收空心螺钉可能是钛螺钉的一种替代选择。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
First Tarsometatarsal Joint Derotational Arthrodesis for Flexible Hallux Valgus: Results from Follow-Up of 3-8 Years.
Scand J Surg. 2017 Dec;106(4):325-331. doi: 10.1177/1457496916683095. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
6
Evaluation of Fixation Techniques for Metatarsocuneiform Arthrodesis.跖楔关节融合术固定技术的评估
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 May-Jun;56(3):468-473. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
9
Symptomatic Hardware Removal After First Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 Jan-Feb;55(1):55-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jul 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验