Suppr超能文献

第一跖趾关节融合术——四种固定技术的生物力学比较

Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint-A biomechanical comparison of four fixation techniques.

作者信息

Harris Ella, Moroney Paul, Tourné Yves

机构信息

Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, 152-160 Pearse Street, Dublin 2, Ireland.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 Dec;23(4):268-274. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Jul 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint is a commonly performed orthopaedic procedure. The optimum method of fixation and joint surface preparation has yet to be determined.

METHODS

This study compared four fixation techniques: Biomechanical grade sawbones were used. The dorsal plate used was a titanium, anatomically contoured locked plate. Testing was performed using an Instron machine applying force from the plantar aspect of the fused joint. Each fused sample was tested to failure. Stiffness, as calculated from the force-displacement curve, and ultimate load tolerated were recorded for each sample. The method of failure of each sample was also documented.

RESULTS

Constructs arthrodesed using dorsal plate with separate screw groups, regardless of method of joint preparation, were the stiffest (p<0.001). The weakest construct was dorsal plate alone without interfragmenary screw. There was no difference in stiffness between planar and cup-cone joint preparation (p=0.99). Maximum load tolerated was similar when comparing Crossed Screws with dorsal plate with screw with either cup-cone or planar reaming (p=0.93, p=0.89 respectively). Dorsal plating alone tolerated a significantly lower maximum load than Plate with Screw Groups or Crossed Screws (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that an IFS combined with a dorsally positioned locked-plate is the ideal construct, with the joint preparation technique of little consequence.

摘要

背景

第一跖趾关节融合术是一种常见的骨科手术。目前尚未确定最佳的固定方法和关节面处理方式。

方法

本研究比较了四种固定技术:使用生物力学等级的人工骨。使用的背侧钢板为钛制、解剖形状的锁定钢板。使用英斯特朗试验机从融合关节的足底方向施加力进行测试。每个融合样本均测试至失效。记录每个样本根据力-位移曲线计算得出的刚度以及耐受的极限载荷。还记录了每个样本的失效方式。

结果

无论关节处理方式如何,使用带有单独螺钉组的背侧钢板进行关节融合的结构刚度最大(p<0.001)。最弱的结构是单独使用背侧钢板而无骨折间螺钉。平面和杯锥关节处理方式之间的刚度无差异(p=0.99)。将交叉螺钉与带有杯锥或平面扩孔的螺钉的背侧钢板进行比较时,耐受的最大载荷相似(分别为p=0.93,p=0.89)。单独使用背侧钢板耐受的最大载荷明显低于带有螺钉组的钢板或交叉螺钉(p<0.001)。

结论

本研究证实,带锁钢板联合IFS是理想的结构,关节处理技术影响不大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验