Wang Hao-Yu, Wang Yang, Yin Dong, Gao Run-Lin, Yang Yue-Jin, Xu Bo, Dou Ke-Fei
Department of Cardiology, Coronary Heart Disease Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China.
Medical Research & Biometrics Center, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China.
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Apr 25;2020:2985435. doi: 10.1155/2020/2985435. eCollection 2020.
BACKGROUND/AIM: The relation between complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), high bleeding risk (HBR), and adverse events after coronary artery implantation of drug-eluting stents has been incompletely characterized. This study sought to investigate the ischemic and bleeding events after complex PCI including stratification according to HBR estimated by PARIS bleeding risk score.
Between January 2013 and December 2013, 10,167 consecutive patients undergoing PCI were prospectively enrolled in Fuwai PCI Registry. Complex PCI was defined when having at least one of the following characteristics: 3 vessels treated, ≥3 stents implanted, ≥3 lesions treated, bifurcation with 2 stents implanted, total stent length >60 mm, treatment of chronic total occlusion, unprotected left main PCI, in-stent restenosis target lesion, and severely calcified lesion. The primary ischemic endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, definite/probable stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization), and primary bleeding endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding.
The median duration of follow-up was 29 months. In adjusted Cox regression analysis, patients having complex PCI procedures experienced higher risks of MACE (hazard ratio (HR): 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38-1.92; < 0.001), compared with noncomplex PCI. In contrast, the risk of clinically relevant bleeding was statistically similar between the 2 groups (HR: 0.86 [0.66-1.11]; = 0.238). There was no statistical interaction between HBR (PARIS bleeding score ≥8 or <8) and complex PCI in regard to MACE (adjusted = 0.388) and clinically relevant bleeding (adjusted = 0.279).
Patients who had undergone complex PCI resulted in substantially more ischemic events, without an increase in clinically relevant bleeding risk, and these associations did not seem to be modified by HBR status. More intensified antiplatelet therapy may be beneficial for patients with complex percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures.
背景/目的:药物洗脱支架冠状动脉植入术后,复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)、高出血风险(HBR)与不良事件之间的关系尚未完全明确。本研究旨在调查复杂PCI术后的缺血和出血事件,包括根据PARIS出血风险评分估计的HBR进行分层。
2013年1月至2013年12月期间,10167例连续接受PCI的患者被前瞻性纳入阜外PCI注册研究。当具备以下至少一项特征时定义为复杂PCI:治疗3支血管、植入≥3枚支架、治疗≥3处病变、植入2枚支架的分叉病变、总支架长度>60 mm、慢性完全闭塞病变的治疗、无保护左主干PCI、支架内再狭窄靶病变以及严重钙化病变。主要缺血终点为主要不良心血管事件(MACE)(包括心源性死亡、心肌梗死、明确/可能的支架血栓形成以及靶病变血运重建),主要出血终点为出血学术研究联盟(BARC)2型、3型或5型出血。
中位随访时间为29个月。在调整后的Cox回归分析中,与非复杂PCI相比,接受复杂PCI手术的患者发生MACE的风险更高(风险比(HR):1.63,95%置信区间(CI):1.38 - 1.92;P < 0.001)。相比之下,两组之间临床相关出血风险在统计学上相似(HR:0.86 [0.66 - 1.11];P = 0.238)。在MACE(调整后P = 0.388)和临床相关出血(调整后P = 0.279)方面,HBR(PARIS出血评分≥8或<8)与复杂PCI之间无统计学交互作用。
接受复杂PCI的患者发生的缺血事件明显更多,而临床相关出血风险并未增加,并且这些关联似乎不受HBR状态的影响。对于接受复杂经皮冠状动脉血运重建手术的患者,更强化的抗血小板治疗可能有益。