• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

翻修髋关节置换术中经股骨干 Wagner 入路植入模块化锥形开槽干骺端下沉的风险因素。

Risk factors for subsidence of modular fluted tapered stem implanted by using transfemoral Wagner approach during revision hip arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2020 Sep;44(9):1685-1691. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04582-1. Epub 2020 May 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00264-020-04582-1
PMID:32405886
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine clinical and radiographic risk factors for the vertical subsidence of modular fluted tapered stems implanted using the transfemoral Wagner approach in a cohort of revision hip arthroplasties.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a single-centre surgical registry was performed. Patients who underwent a revision total hip arthroplasty, in which the uncemented modular fluted tapered stem (REVISION Hip/Anca-Ti6Al4V, LimaCorporate, Udine, Italy) was implanted using the transfemoral Wagner approach, were identified. Patient's demographic data, clinical and radiographic outcomes and post-operative complications were assessed. As a significant subsidence, a 5-mm cut-off was chosen.

RESULTS

We identified 278 revision hip arthroplasties with a mean follow-up of 35 months. The median of subsidence in the group of 5 mm and less was 2 mm, and 17 mm in the group of subsidence of 5 mm and more. A negative correlation was found between the stem subsidence and the length of good contact between the medial and lateral cortical bone and the stem (medial, - 0.248; P < 0.001, lateral, 0.284; P < 0.001). For 200 mm stems, the percentage of good contact between femoral parts of stem and bone on medial side was 40.5% (81.0 mm) for patients with subsidence of five or less mm, and 30% (60.0 mm) for lateral side. For 140 mm stems, the percentage was 52.86% (74.0 mm) for medial side and 40.36% (56.5 mm) for lateral side. A neck length was shown to correlate significantly with the stem subsidence (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

It is crucial to provide good contact between the bilateral cortical bone and stem, and, if possible, to select implant constructs with shorter femoral necks, in order to reduce subsidence and to ensure longer implant survivorship.

摘要

目的

在接受经股骨干 Wagner 入路翻修全髋关节置换术的患者队列中,确定使用模块化开槽锥形股骨柄的临床和影像学垂直下沉的危险因素。

方法

对单中心手术数据库进行回顾性研究。确定接受非骨水泥模块化开槽锥形股骨柄(REVISION Hip/Anca-Ti6Al4V,LimaCorporate,Udine,意大利)经股骨干 Wagner 入路翻修全髋关节置换术的患者。评估患者的人口统计学数据、临床和影像学结果以及术后并发症。选择 5mm 作为明显下沉的截断值。

结果

我们共纳入 278 例翻修髋关节,平均随访 35 个月。下沉 5mm 及以下组的中位数为 2mm,下沉 5mm 及以上组的中位数为 17mm。发现股骨柄下沉与内侧和外侧皮质骨与股骨柄之间的良好接触长度呈负相关(内侧,-0.248;P<0.001,外侧,0.284;P<0.001)。对于 200mm 长的股骨柄,下沉 5mm 及以下组患者的股骨柄与骨之间的内侧接触率为 40.5%(81.0mm),外侧接触率为 30%(60.0mm)。对于 140mm 长的股骨柄,内侧接触率为 52.86%(74.0mm),外侧接触率为 40.36%(56.5mm)。股骨柄颈长度与股骨柄下沉显著相关(P=0.004)。

结论

为了减少下沉并确保更长的植入物存活率,重要的是要提供双侧皮质骨与股骨柄之间的良好接触,如果可能的话,还应选择股骨柄颈较短的植入物结构。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for subsidence of modular fluted tapered stem implanted by using transfemoral Wagner approach during revision hip arthroplasty.翻修髋关节置换术中经股骨干 Wagner 入路植入模块化锥形开槽干骺端下沉的风险因素。
Int Orthop. 2020 Sep;44(9):1685-1691. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04582-1. Epub 2020 May 13.
2
Risk Factors for Subsidence of Modular Fluted Tapered Stems Used During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Hip Fractures.翻修全髋关节置换术治疗人工关节周围骨折中使用的模块化带槽锥形柄下沉的危险因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Sep;33(9):2967-2970. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 May 9.
3
What Is the Difference Between Modular and Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.翻修全髋关节置换术中模块化与非模块化锥形带槽钛柄的区别是什么。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):3108-3113. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.021. Epub 2017 May 18.
4
Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Modular Tapered Fluted Stems for Femoral Revision for Paprosky III and IV Femoral Defects or Vancouver B2 and B3 Femoral Fractures.模块化锥形开槽柄在治疗 Paprosky III 和 IV 型股骨缺损或 Vancouver B2 和 B3 型股骨骨折的股骨翻修中的影像学和临床结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Apr;35(4):1069-1073. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.039. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
5
Bicortical Contact Predicts Subsidence of Modular Tapered Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.双皮质接触可预测翻修全髋关节置换术中模块化锥形柄的下沉。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Aug;35(8):2195-2199. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.047. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
6
Implant breakage and revision factors for modular fluted tapered stems in revision total hip arthroplasty.翻修全髋关节置换术中模块化带槽锥形柄的植入物断裂及翻修因素
Hip Int. 2024 Mar;34(2):207-214. doi: 10.1177/11207000231180065. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
7
Incidence and Predictors of Subsidence Using Modular, Tapered, Fluted Titanium Femoral Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.在无菌性翻修全髋关节置换术中使用模块化、锥形、带槽钛股骨柄的下沉发生率及预测因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 May;39(5):1304-1311. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.10.057. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
8
Modular Fluted Tapered Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.模块化带槽锥形柄在无菌翻修全髋关节置换术中的应用。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 May 17;99(10):873-881. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00423.
9
Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs.非模块化锥形带槽钛柄在翻修全髋关节置换术中短期内能可靠地实现骨整合。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):186-192. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5091-x. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
10
Modern Revision Femoral Stem Designs Have No Difference in Rates of Subsidence.现代翻修股骨柄设计在下沉率方面没有差异。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jan;36(1):268-273. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.078. Epub 2020 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
High subsidence rate in primary total hip arthroplasty with a taper wedge stem featuring a three-dimensionally printed porous structure.采用具有三维打印多孔结构的锥形楔形柄的初次全髋关节置换术中的高下沉率。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Mar 14;145(1):188. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05809-9.
2
Resection and reconstruction of the proximal femur with revision stems: a cost-effective alternative.使用翻修柄对股骨近端进行切除与重建:一种具有成本效益的替代方案。
Ann Jt. 2022 Nov 18;8:1. doi: 10.21037/aoj-20-104. eCollection 2023.
3
Monoblock tapered stems in management of UCS B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures in revision total hip arthroplasty.
一体式锥形柄在翻修全髋关节置换术中治疗UCS B2和B3型假体周围骨折的应用
Bone Jt Open. 2023 Aug 1;4(8):551-558. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.48.BJO-2022-0160.R1.