Taber Jennifer M, Cribbet Matthew R, Cadmus-Bertram Lisa, Mays Darren, Smith M E Beth, Rana Brinda, Paljarvi Tapio
Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH, 44242-0001, USA.
Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35401, USA.
Int J Behav Med. 2021 Apr;28(2):162-176. doi: 10.1007/s12529-020-09892-7.
Links among poor sleep and cancer risk behaviors have been largely overlooked in the context of cancer prevention and behavioral medicine. The goal of this scoping review was to determine the extent and nature of experimental studies conducted with healthy adult populations that tested the associations among poor sleep and cancer risk behaviors.
Electronic databases and major sleep journals were searched to identify experimental studies in healthy adult samples published through January 2018. Studies examined associations among eight pairings of manipulated behaviors and outcomes ("independent variable (IV)-outcome pairs"): the impact of sleep manipulations on physical activity (PA), diet, alcohol consumption, and tobacco use outcomes; and the impact of PA, diet, alcohol consumption, and tobacco use manipulations on sleep outcomes. Studies were characterized in terms of sample characteristics; study design; IV type, dose, and duration; and outcome measurement and duration.
Abstracts of 5697 papers and 345 full texts were screened. Eighty-eight studies describing 125 comparisons met inclusion criteria. Only two studies tested the association between tobacco use and sleep; none tested whether sleep influenced alcohol consumption. Sample sizes were typically small, most studies used crossover designs, and studies tended to include younger and more male participants. Within each IV-outcome pair, there was substantial heterogeneity in how behaviors were manipulated, outcome measurement, and type of control group. Few studies assessed mechanisms.
There is a need for larger experimental studies with more representative samples. Overall, heterogeneity and limitations in study designs make it difficult to synthesize evidence across studies.
在癌症预防和行为医学领域,睡眠不佳与癌症风险行为之间的联系在很大程度上被忽视了。本范围综述的目的是确定针对健康成年人群进行的实验研究的范围和性质,这些研究测试了睡眠不佳与癌症风险行为之间的关联。
检索电子数据库和主要睡眠期刊,以识别截至2018年1月发表的针对健康成年样本的实验研究。研究考察了八对被操纵行为与结果(“自变量(IV)-结果对”)之间的关联:睡眠操纵对身体活动(PA)、饮食、饮酒和烟草使用结果的影响;以及PA、饮食、饮酒和烟草使用操纵对睡眠结果的影响。根据样本特征、研究设计、IV类型、剂量和持续时间以及结果测量和持续时间对研究进行了描述。
筛选了5697篇论文的摘要和345篇全文。88项描述125项比较的研究符合纳入标准。只有两项研究测试了烟草使用与睡眠之间的关联;没有研究测试睡眠是否影响饮酒。样本量通常较小,大多数研究采用交叉设计,并且研究倾向于纳入更年轻、男性更多的参与者。在每对IV-结果对中,行为操纵、结果测量和对照组类型方面存在很大异质性。很少有研究评估机制。
需要进行更大规模的实验研究,采用更具代表性的样本。总体而言,研究设计中的异质性和局限性使得难以综合各项研究的证据。