• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新审视创新视角下的环境库兹涅茨曲线假说:来自十大创新经济体的新证据。

Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis using innovation: new evidence from the top 10 innovative economies.

机构信息

Faculty of Political Sciences, Department of Public Finance, Sakarya University, Esentepe Campus, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.

Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Statistics, Sakarya University, Esentepe Campus, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Aug;27(22):27904-27913. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09110-7. Epub 2020 May 13.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-09110-7
PMID:32405937
Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between ecological footprint, economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and innovation within the framework of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis for the top 10 innovative economies, namely, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Israel, Korea, The Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK, and the USA, in the period of 1990-2015. For this purpose, the long-term relationship between variables was examined with a panel cointegration test. The results show that the variables in the EKC model move together in the long run. According to the long-run estimation results, the EKC hypothesis is valid for Israel, but not for the other countries. The study also makes the following observations: (i) For Korea, the USA, Finland, and the whole panel, innovation appears to reduce environmental pollution. (ii) Renewable energy consumption reduces environmental pollution for Denmark, Germany, The Netherlands, and the USA. (iii) Globalization has an impact on the reduction of environmental pollution for Germany and Switzerland. As a result, developing policies on the use of more innovative technologies in the countries studied will have a positive impact on environmental pollution. Graphical abstract.

摘要

本研究旨在检验生态足迹、经济增长、可再生能源消费与创新之间的关系,其研究框架为环境库兹涅茨曲线(EKC)假说,研究对象为丹麦、芬兰、德国、以色列、韩国、荷兰、瑞典、瑞士、英国和美国这 10 个创新型经济体,研究时间跨度为 1990 年至 2015 年。为此,我们采用面板协整检验来检验变量之间的长期关系。结果表明,EKC 模型中的变量在长期内是协同变化的。根据长期估计结果,EKC 假说对以色列成立,但对其他国家不成立。本研究还观察到以下几点:(i)对韩国、美国、芬兰和整个面板而言,创新似乎减少了环境污染。(ii)对丹麦、德国、荷兰和美国而言,可再生能源消费减少了环境污染。(iii)全球化对德国和瑞士减少环境污染有影响。因此,在研究的国家中制定更多创新技术使用政策将对环境污染产生积极影响。图摘要。

相似文献

1
Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis using innovation: new evidence from the top 10 innovative economies.重新审视创新视角下的环境库兹涅茨曲线假说:来自十大创新经济体的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Aug;27(22):27904-27913. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09110-7. Epub 2020 May 13.
2
The role of economic freedom in achieving the environmental sustainability for the highest economic freedom countries: testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis.经济自由在实现经济自由度最高国家的环境可持续性方面的作用:检验环境库兹涅茨曲线假说。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Dec;31(60):67187-67196. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29120-5. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
3
Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic complexity, CO emissions, and ecological footprint in the USA: testing the EKC hypothesis with a structural break.美国的可再生和不可再生能源消耗、经济复杂性、CO2 排放和生态足迹:结构断裂检验 EKC 假说。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jan;28(1):846-861. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10446-3. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
4
The nexus of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption, trade openness, and CO emissions in the framework of EKC: evidence from emerging economies.在 EKC 框架下的可再生能源和不可再生能源消费、贸易开放度和二氧化碳排放的关系:来自新兴经济体的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 May;26(15):15162-15173. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04912-w. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
5
Environmental regulation, renewable electricity, industrialization, economic complexity, technological innovation, and sustainable environment: testing the N-shaped EKC hypothesis for the G-10 economies.环境规制、可再生电力、工业化、经济复杂度、技术创新和可持续环境:检验 G-10 经济体的 N 型 EKC 假说。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Sep;30(44):99713-99734. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29188-z. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
6
How does economic complexity affect ecological footprint in G-7 economies: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumptions and testing EKC hypothesis.经济复杂度如何影响 G7 经济体的生态足迹:可再生和不可再生能源消费的作用以及检验 EKC 假说。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(31):47647-47660. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19094-1. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
7
Do foreign direct investment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO emissions? New evidence from a panel ARDL approach to Kyoto Annex countries.外国直接投资和可再生能源消费会影响二氧化碳排放吗?来自京都议定书附件国家的面板自回归分布滞后模型方法的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Nov;23(21):21669-21681. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7413-7. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
8
Testing environmental Kuznets curve for the USA under a regime shift: the role of renewable energy.检验美国在制度转变下的环境库兹涅茨曲线:可再生能源的作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 May;26(14):14562-14569. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04835-6. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
9
Testing validity of the EKC hypothesis in South Korea: role of renewable energy and trade openness.检验韩国环境库兹涅茨曲线假说的有效性:可再生能源和贸易开放的作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Aug;27(23):29043-29054. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09172-7. Epub 2020 May 18.
10
Nuclear energy transition and CO emissions nexus in 28 nuclear electricity-producing countries with different income levels.核能转型与收入水平不同的 28 个核电生产国家的 CO 排放关系。
PeerJ. 2022 Jul 25;10:e13780. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13780. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Green growth as a determinant of ecological footprint: Do ICT diffusion, environmental innovation, and natural resources matter?绿色增长对生态足迹的决定作用:信息通信技术扩散、环境创新和自然资源重要吗?
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 13;18(9):e0287715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287715. eCollection 2023.
2
Empirical analysis of the impact of China-Japan-South Korea transportation infrastructure investment on environmental degradation and the validity of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis.中日韩交通基础设施投资对环境退化影响及环境库兹涅茨曲线假说有效性的实证分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 18;13:977466. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.977466. eCollection 2022.
3
Influence of green technology, green energy consumption, energy efficiency, trade, economic development and FDI on climate change in South Asia.
南亚绿色技术、绿色能源消耗、能源效率、贸易、经济发展和外国直接投资对气候变化的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 30;12(1):16376. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20432-z.