Suppr超能文献

血清碳酸氢盐剂量与气体分析计算值在慢性肾病人群中的一致性分析。

Concordance analysis between dosed serum bicarbonate and that calculated by gas analysis in chronic renal patients.

机构信息

Universidade Estadual Paulista, Departamento de Medicina Interna, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

出版信息

J Bras Nefrol. 2020 Oct-Dec;42(4):478-481. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2019-0236.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The control of metabolic acidosis in dialysis patients focuses on the supply of bicarbonate during the dialysis session, and it is not standard in all hemodialysis to assess serum bicarbonate concentrations. Bicarbonate expressed in blood gas analysis is the most sensitive standard of analysis and it is measured indirectly, using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation. There are no studies in this population evaluating the concordance between the calculated bicarbonate with the direct method of biochemical analysis. The aim of this study was to analyze the concordance between the measured and calculated serum bicarbonate levels using blood gas analysis.

METHODS

We analyzed blood samples from chronic kidney patients undergoing hemodialysis, using the same sample of bicarbonate analysis by biochemistry and gasometry. The concordance was assessed using the Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

51 samples were analyzed. The analysis revealed a high correlation (r = 0.73) and a mean difference (bias) of 1.15 ± 3 mmol/L. The median time between collection and examination was 241 minutes.

DISCUSSION

We can conclude that the biochemical bicarbonate analysis compared to that calculated from blood gas analysis in chronic renal patients was consistent. For greater concordance between the data, it is important that the time between the collection of the samples and the referral to the laboratory for carrying out the dosages does not exceed four hours. The serum bicarbonate dosage can result in cost savings when compared to that of bicarbonate in blood gas analysis.

摘要

简介

透析患者代谢性酸中毒的控制重点在于透析过程中碳酸氢盐的供应,并非所有血液透析都要评估血清碳酸氢盐浓度。血气分析中所表示的碳酸氢盐是最敏感的分析标准,它是通过间接测量,使用 Henderson-Hasselbalch 方程来实现的。在该人群中,尚无评估计算碳酸氢盐与生化分析直接方法之间一致性的研究。本研究旨在分析血气分析中测定的和计算的血清碳酸氢盐水平之间的一致性。

方法

我们分析了接受血液透析的慢性肾病患者的血液样本,使用相同的碳酸氢盐生化分析和血气分析样本。使用 Bland-Altman 方法评估一致性。

结果

共分析了 51 个样本。分析结果显示两者高度相关(r = 0.73),平均差异(偏差)为 1.15 ± 3 mmol/L。采集和检查之间的中位时间为 241 分钟。

讨论

我们可以得出结论,与慢性肾患者的血气分析中计算出的碳酸氢盐相比,生化碳酸氢盐分析是一致的。为了使数据更一致,从采集样本到实验室进行检测的时间不应超过四个小时。与血气分析中的碳酸氢盐相比,血清碳酸氢盐检测可以节省成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7798/7860641/66a7e9d84854/2175-8239-jbn-2019-0236-gf01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验