Suh Hanna, Kim Shin Ye, McCabe Eleanor A
Psychology and Child & Human Development Academic Group,National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
J Am Coll Health. 2022 Feb-Mar;70(2):420-427. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1752696. Epub 2020 May 14.
We explored latent profiles based on mindfulness and difficulties in emotion regulation scores, and investigated each profiles' relations to work-family-school conflict (WFSC). A total of 194 first year college students (64.4% women) participated in this study. Latent profile analysis was utilized. Three profiles emerged, characterized as the "healthy" profile (57.5%), the "observant yet judgmental" profile (33.3%) and the "unhealthy without strategies" profile (9.2%). The "healthy" profile showed (a) significantly lower scores on all conflict domains compared to the "observant yet judgmental" profile, and (b) significantly lower scores on all behavior-based conflicts regardless of the domains, compared to the "unhealthy without strategies" profile. The difference between the "observant yet judgmental" profile and "unhealthy without strategies" profile appeared in family-school time. Results indicate that mindfulness and healthy emotion regulation capacity function as protective factors to WFSC. Our findings hold strength in explicating profiles that would otherwise have not been detected when exploring mindfulness and difficulties in emotion regulation independently.
我们基于正念和情绪调节困难得分探索了潜在类别,并研究了每个类与工作-家庭-学校冲突(WFSC)的关系。共有194名大学一年级学生(64.4%为女性)参与了本研究。采用了潜在类别分析。出现了三类,分别为“健康”类(57.5%)、“善于观察但爱评判”类(33.3%)和“无应对策略的不健康”类(9.2%)。“健康”类表现为:(a)与“善于观察但爱评判”类相比,在所有冲突领域的得分显著更低;(b)与“无应对策略的不健康”类相比,在所有基于行为的冲突方面,无论在哪个领域,得分均显著更低。“善于观察但爱评判”类与“无应对策略的不健康”类在家庭-学校时间方面存在差异。结果表明,正念和健康的情绪调节能力对WFSC起到保护作用。我们的研究结果有助于清晰呈现这些类别,而这些类别在单独探索正念和情绪调节困难时可能无法被发现。