Suppr超能文献

明尼苏达州门诊和长期护理环境中老年人的成本和牙科利用模式的纵向分析。

Longitudinal analysis of cost and dental utilization patterns for older adults in outpatient and long-term care settings in Minnesota.

机构信息

Apple Tree Dental, Mounds View, Minnesota, United States of America.

School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 May 14;15(5):e0232898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232898. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dental utilization patterns and costs of providing comprehensive oral healthcare for older adults in different settings have not been examined.

METHODS

Retrospective longitudinal cohort data from Apple Tree Dental (ATD) were analyzed (N = 1,159 total; 503 outpatients, 656 long-term care residents) to describe oral health status at presentation, service utilization patterns, and care costs. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) repeated measures analysis identified significant contributors to service cost over the three-year study period.

RESULTS

Cohort mean age was 74 years (range = 55-104); the outpatient (OP) group was younger compared to the long-term care (LTC) group. Half (56%) had Medicaid, 22% had other insurance, and 22% self-paid. Most (72%) had functional dentitions (20+ teeth), 15% had impaired dentitions (9-19 teeth), 6% had severe tooth loss (1-8 teeth), and 7% were edentulous (OP = 2%, LTC = 11%). More in the OP group had functional dentition (83% vs. 63% LTC). The number of appointments declined from 5.0 in Year 1 (OP = 5.7, LTC = 4.4) to 3.3 in Year 3 (OP = 3.6, LTC = 3.0). The average cost to provide dental services was $1,375/year for three years (OP = $1,427, LTC = $1,336), and costs declined each year, from an average of $1,959 (OP = $2,068, LTC = $1,876) in Year 1 to $1,016 (OP = $989, LTC = $1,037) by Year 3. Those with functional dentition at presentation were significantly less costly than those with 1-19 teeth, while edentulous patients demonstrated the lowest cost and utilization. Year in treatment, insurance type, dentition type, and problem-focused first exam were significantly associated with year-over-year cost change in both OP and LTC patients.

CONCLUSION

Costs for providing comprehensive dental care in OP and LTC settings were similar, modest, and declined over time. Dentate patients with functional dentition and edentulous patients were less costly to treat. LTC patients had lower utilization than OP patients. Care patterns shifted over time to increased preventive care and decreased restorative care visits.

摘要

背景

不同环境下为老年人提供全面口腔保健的牙科利用模式和成本尚未得到研究。

方法

对 Apple Tree Dental(ATD)的回顾性纵向队列数据(N=1159 人,503 名门诊患者,656 名长期护理居民)进行分析,描述就诊时的口腔健康状况、服务利用模式和护理费用。广义估计方程(GEE)重复测量分析确定了研究期间服务成本的显著贡献者。

结果

队列平均年龄为 74 岁(范围=55-104 岁);门诊(OP)组比长期护理(LTC)组年轻。一半(56%)有医疗补助,22%有其他保险,22%自付。大多数(72%)有功能牙列(20+颗牙齿),15%有受损牙列(9-19 颗牙齿),6%有严重牙齿缺失(1-8 颗牙齿),7%无牙(OP=2%,LTC=11%)。OP 组中功能牙列的比例更高(83%比 LTC 组的 63%)。就诊次数从第 1 年的 5.0 次(OP=5.7 次,LTC=4.4 次)下降到第 3 年的 3.3 次(OP=3.6 次,LTC=3.0 次)。三年的牙科服务平均成本为 1375 美元/年(OP=1427 美元,LTC=1336 美元),且每年呈下降趋势,从第 1 年的平均 1959 美元(OP=2068 美元,LTC=1876 美元)下降到第 3 年的 1016 美元(OP=989 美元,LTC=1037 美元)。就诊时具有功能牙列的患者比 1-19 颗牙齿的患者成本显著降低,而无牙患者的成本和利用率最低。治疗年限、保险类型、牙列类型和以问题为中心的首次检查是门诊和长期护理患者年成本变化的显著相关因素。

结论

OP 和 LTC 环境中提供全面牙科护理的成本相似、适度且随时间推移而下降。具有功能牙列的有牙患者和无牙患者的治疗成本较低。LTC 患者的利用率低于 OP 患者。护理模式随着时间的推移而转变,增加了预防保健和减少了修复护理就诊次数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cb9/7224465/53cd8f1d2ad2/pone.0232898.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验