Suppr超能文献

消费者排名与医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services)对养老院的五星排名比较。

Comparison of Consumer Rankings With Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Five-Star Rankings of Nursing Homes.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine.

iTEQC Research Program, University of California, Irvine.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e204798. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.4798.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Five-Star measure for nursing homes is designed with input from expert panels about the importance of multiple quality indicators. Consumers may assign different values to these indicators, creating different 5-star ratings.

OBJECTIVE

To compare nursing homes' rankings based on the CMS Five-Star measure with rankings based on consumers' judgment about the importance of the same quality indicators.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this quality improvement study, CMS Five-Star data were linked with a measure calculated from CMS quality indicators and consumer values obtained from a national survey. Data covered the last quarter of 2016 and the first three quarters of 2017. The study included 10 676 nursing homes, comprising 69.8% of those with reported Five-Star measures. The national survey included adults, either nursing home residents or their family members who reported being familiar with the quality of care their relative received. Data analysis was performed from January 2019 to February 2020.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The contingent valuation method was administered via the survey to obtain consumers' relative values of the quality indicators, and statistical analyses were used to create the contingent valuation measure. Agreement in nursing home rankings was assessed using the Five-Star measure, which is based on weights developed by expert panels, compared with rankings based on the contingent valuation measure.

RESULTS

Among 10 676 study nursing homes with a mean (SD) of 119.4 (59.4) beds, 7845 (73.5%) were for profit, 6424 (61.8%) were part of a chain, and 8009 (75.0%) were urban. The 4310 survey respondents (mean [SD] age, 39.9 [15.6] years; 1143 [26.5%] men; 3448 [80%] white) included mostly family members (3879 participants [90.0%]). The Pearson correlation coefficient (0.65) and weighted κ statistics (0.48) indicated only moderate agreement between ranking of nursing homes' performance by the 2 measures and disagreement on ranking for approximately one-half of the nursing homes.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Current nursing home report cards might not reflect consumers' values and the relative importance consumers place on each of the quality indicators that compose the overall Five-Star measure. Quality report cards might be more relevant to consumers by augmenting the Five-Star measure with a measure reflecting consumers' preferences. It is unknown whether these conclusions are generalizable to other report cards, such as Hospital and Home Health Compare, without conducting similar studies for these report cards.

摘要

重要性

医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心 (CMS) 的养老院五星评价是在专家小组对多项质量指标重要性的意见基础上制定的。消费者可能会对这些指标赋予不同的价值,从而产生不同的五星评级。

目的

将养老院基于 CMS 五星评价的排名与基于消费者对相同质量指标重要性的判断的排名进行比较。

设计、设置和参与者:在这项质量改进研究中,CMS 五星数据与从 CMS 质量指标和从全国调查中获得的消费者价值计算得出的一项衡量标准进行了关联。数据涵盖了 2016 年最后一个季度和 2017 年的前三个季度。研究包括 10676 家养老院,占报告有五星评价的养老院的 69.8%。全国调查包括成年人,他们是养老院居民或其家属,报告熟悉他们亲属接受的护理质量。数据分析于 2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 2 月进行。

主要结果和测量方法

通过调查采用条件价值评估法获得消费者对质量指标的相对价值,并进行统计分析以创建条件价值评估衡量标准。使用基于专家小组制定的权重的五星评价与基于条件价值评估衡量标准的排名进行比较,以评估养老院排名的一致性。

结果

在 10676 家研究养老院中,平均(SD)有 119.4(59.4)张床位,其中 7845 家(73.5%)为盈利性,6424 家(61.8%)为连锁性,8009 家(75.0%)为城市性。4310 名调查参与者(平均[SD]年龄,39.9[15.6]岁;1143[26.5%]名男性;3448[80%]名白人)大多为家属(3879 名参与者[90.0%])。Pearson 相关系数(0.65)和加权 κ 统计量(0.48)表明,这两种衡量标准对养老院绩效的排名仅具有中等一致性,大约一半的养老院排名存在分歧。

结论和相关性

目前的养老院报告卡可能无法反映消费者的价值观以及消费者对构成整体五星评价的每项质量指标的相对重要性。通过使用反映消费者偏好的衡量标准来补充五星评价,报告卡可能对消费者更相关。在没有对这些报告卡进行类似研究的情况下,尚不清楚这些结论是否可以推广到其他报告卡,例如医院和家庭健康比较。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验