• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为医疗保健中的消费者决策提供信息:决策研究的启示

Informing consumer decisions in health care: implications from decision-making research.

作者信息

Hibbard J H, Slovic P, Jewett J J

机构信息

University of Oregon, Department of Planning, Public Policy, and Management, Eugene 97403-1209, USA.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 1997;75(3):395-414. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00061.

DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.00061
PMID:9290635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2751049/
Abstract

Despite the wider dissemination of health plan report cards, little is known about whether consumers will use this information in making plan and provider choices. Studies of human judgment and decision making are reviewed, as are their implications for devising strategies to inform consumers. The limitations of human information processing suggest that many consumers will not use performance information in making choices. Strategies are needed to support consumers who prefer to rely on intermediaries as well as those who wish to apply the information for their own use. Many current strategies are based on assumptions not supported by existing decision-making research. Although there is much to learn about assisting consumers in making informed choices, a great deal is known from decision-making research. Our approaches and our research agenda must be based on this existing foundation of knowledge.

摘要

尽管健康计划成绩单得到了更广泛的传播,但对于消费者是否会在选择计划和医疗服务提供者时使用这些信息,人们却知之甚少。本文回顾了有关人类判断和决策的研究,以及这些研究对设计向消费者提供信息的策略的启示。人类信息处理的局限性表明,许多消费者在做出选择时不会使用绩效信息。需要制定策略来支持那些倾向于依赖中介机构的消费者,以及那些希望自行运用这些信息的消费者。当前的许多策略都基于现有决策研究未支持的假设。虽然在帮助消费者做出明智选择方面还有很多需要学习的地方,但决策研究已经有了很多已知的知识。我们的方法和研究议程必须基于这一现有的知识基础。

相似文献

1
Informing consumer decisions in health care: implications from decision-making research.为医疗保健中的消费者决策提供信息:决策研究的启示
Milbank Q. 1997;75(3):395-414. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00061.
2
What do consumers want and need to know in making health care choices?消费者在做出医疗保健选择时想要并需要了解什么?
Med Care Res Rev. 1999;56 Suppl 1:67-102; discussion 103-12. doi: 10.1177/1077558799056001S04.
3
Health care report cards: what about consumers' perspectives?医疗保健报告卡:消费者怎么看?
J Ambul Care Manage. 1994 Oct;17(4):1-14. doi: 10.1097/00004479-199410000-00003.
4
Managed care for Medicare: some considerations in designing effective information provision programs.医疗保险的管理式医疗:设计有效信息提供项目时的一些考量
J Aging Soc Policy. 2001;13(1):57-68. doi: 10.1300/j031v13n01_04.
5
The effectiveness of CAHPS among women enrolling in Medicaid managed care.
J Ambul Care Manage. 2001 Oct;24(4):76-91. doi: 10.1097/00004479-200110000-00006.
6
Consumer information development and use.消费者信息的开发与使用。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Fall;18(1):15-30.
7
How will consumers use report cards in selecting health plans?
Manag Care Q. 1995 Autumn;3(4):32-5.
8
Do consumers know how their health plan works?消费者了解他们的健康保险计划是如何运作的吗?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Mar-Apr;20(2):159-66. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.2.159.
9
Considering quality: engaging consumers to make better health care decisions.考量质量:促使消费者做出更优的医疗保健决策。
Issue Brief (Grantmakers Health). 2007 Jan(27):i-v, 1-31.
10
Awakening consumer stewardship of health benefits: prevalence and differentiation of new health plan models.唤醒消费者对健康福利的管理意识:新型健康保险计划模式的普及与差异
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 2):1055-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00273.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospital Rating Organizations' Quality and Patient Safety Scores: Analysis of Result Discrepancies.医院评级机构的质量和患者安全评分:结果差异分析
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Feb;40(3):525-531. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08950-0. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
2
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.决策辅助工具用于帮助面临医疗保健治疗或筛查决策的人。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 29;1(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6.
3
Healthy or not? The impact of conflicting health-related information on attentional resources.健康与否?相互矛盾的健康相关信息对注意力资源的影响。
J Behav Med. 2022 Apr;45(2):306-317. doi: 10.1007/s10865-021-00256-4. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
4
Treatment Preferences for Cardiac Procedures of Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Design and Pilot Testing of a Discrete Choice Experiment.急性冠状动脉综合征合并慢性肾脏病患者心脏手术的治疗偏好:一项离散选择实验的设计与预试验
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2021 Jan 27;8:2054358120985375. doi: 10.1177/2054358120985375. eCollection 2021.
5
Patient and Caregiver Considerations and Priorities When Selecting Hospitals for Complex Cancer Care.患者和照护者在选择复杂癌症治疗医院时的考虑因素和优先事项。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Aug;28(8):4183-4192. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09506-2. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
6
The bypassing of healthcare facilities among National Health Insurance Scheme enrollees in Ibadan, Nigeria.尼日利亚伊巴丹的全民健康保险计划参保者绕过医疗机构就诊的情况。
Int Health. 2021 Apr 27;13(3):291-296. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa063.
7
Patient-Guided Breast Reconstruction Education.患者引导的乳房重建教育。
Cureus. 2020 Jul 8;12(7):e9070. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9070.
8
The Feasibility and Utility of a Personal Health Record for Persons With Dementia and Their Family Caregivers for Web-Based Care Coordination: Mixed Methods Study.个人健康记录对痴呆症患者及其家庭照顾者进行基于网络的护理协调的可行性和效用:混合方法研究
JMIR Aging. 2020 Jun 26;3(1):e17769. doi: 10.2196/17769.
9
Comparison of Consumer Rankings With Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Five-Star Rankings of Nursing Homes.消费者排名与医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services)对养老院的五星排名比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e204798. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.4798.
10
Health Literacy and Plan Choice: Implications for Medicare Managed Care.健康素养与计划选择:对医疗保险管理式医疗的影响
Health Lit Res Pract. 2018 Mar 9;2(1):e40-e54. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20180201-01. eCollection 2018 Jan.