Song Myung Jin, Lee Sang Hoon, Leem Ah Young, Kim Song Yee, Chung Kyung Soo, Kim Eun Young, Jung Ji Ye, Kang Young Ae, Kim Young Sam, Chang Joon, Park Moo Suk
Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Chest Diseases, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Acute Crit Care. 2020 May;35(2):67-76. doi: 10.4266/acc.2020.00024. Epub 2020 May 15.
Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (SIC) occurs frequently in critically ill patients, but the clinical features and prognostic impact of SIC on sepsis outcome remain controversial. Here, we investigated the predictors and outcomes of SIC.
Patients admitted to a single medical intensive care unit from June 2016 to September 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. SIC was diagnosed by ejection fraction (EF) <50% and ≥10% decrease in baseline EF that recovered within 2 weeks.
In total, 342 patients with sepsis met the inclusion criteria, and 49 patients (14.3%) were diagnosed with SIC; the latter were compared with 259 patients whose EF was not deteriorated by sepsis (non-SIC). Low systolic blood pressure and increased left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) were identified as predictors of SIC. SIC and non-SIC patients did not differ significantly in terms of 28-day all-cause mortality (24.5% vs. 26.3%, P=0.936). Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II; hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% confidential interval [CI], 1.02 to 1.18; P=0.009) and delta neutrophil index (DNI; HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.08; P=0.026) were independent risk factors for 28-day mortality with SIC. DNI, APACHE II, and lactate were identified as risk factors for 28-day mortality in sepsis patients as a whole.
SIC was not associated with increased mortality compared to non-SIC. Low systolic blood pressure and increased LVEDD were predictors of SIC. High APACHE II score and elevated DNI, which reflect sepsis severity, predict 28-day all-cause mortality.
脓毒症诱导的心肌病(SIC)在重症患者中频繁发生,但SIC的临床特征及其对脓毒症预后的影响仍存在争议。在此,我们调查了SIC的预测因素和结局。
回顾性分析2016年6月至2017年9月入住单一医学重症监护病房的患者。SIC通过射血分数(EF)<50%且基线EF下降≥10%且在2周内恢复来诊断。
共有342例脓毒症患者符合纳入标准,49例(14.3%)被诊断为SIC;将后者与259例EF未因脓毒症而恶化的患者(非SIC)进行比较。低收缩压和左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)增加被确定为SIC的预测因素。SIC和非SIC患者在28天全因死亡率方面无显著差异(24.5%对26.3%,P = 0.936)。急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II;风险比[HR],1.10;95%置信区间[CI],1.02至1.18;P = 0.009)和中性粒细胞指数变化值(DNI;HR,1.02;95%CI,1.00至1.08;P = 0.026)是SIC患者28天死亡率的独立危险因素。DNI、APACHE II和乳酸被确定为脓毒症患者总体28天死亡率的危险因素。
与非SIC相比,SIC与死亡率增加无关。低收缩压和LVEDD增加是SIC的预测因素。反映脓毒症严重程度的高APACHE II评分和升高的DNI可预测28天全因死亡率。