Department of Biomechanics and Sports Injuries, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Biomechanics and Sports Injuries, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
Gait Posture. 2020 Jun;79:139-144. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.04.022. Epub 2020 May 1.
Recently, the use of treadmills for walking and running has increased due to lifestyle changes. However, biomechanical differences in coordination between running on a treadmill or overground have not been adequately addressed.
The purpose of this study was to compare coordination and its variability in lower limb segments during treadmill and overground running at different speeds.
Twenty physically active university undergraduate students participated in this study. Each participant ran trials for both overground and treadmill running at slow and fast speeds. Three-dimensional kinematic data of the lower limb segments were captured. The continuous relative phase (CRP) was used to compute coordination and its variability (VCRP) for foot, shank, and thigh segments of the dominant side of the participants.
A vector analysis using statistical parametric mapping (SPM) revealed that there were statistically significant differences in the calculated CRPs for treadmill and overground running in the stance phase of running and for different running speeds in the late stance and swing phases. However, the VCRPs calculated for the two locations and speeds did not exhibit any statistically significant differences.
The findings of this study suggest differences in segment coupling between treadmill and overground running may affect lower extremity biomechanics. In addition, changes in the coupling patterns for different running speeds suggest that segment coordination is not stable in the range of training speeds used by runners. Finally, the lack of differences in the variability of segment couplings during treadmill and overground conditions at different speeds potentially demonstrates similar dynamic neuromuscular control and degrees of freedom at these different running locations and speeds.
由于生活方式的改变,人们越来越多地使用跑步机进行行走和跑步。然而,在跑步机或地面上跑步时,协调的生物力学差异尚未得到充分解决。
本研究的目的是比较不同速度下在跑步机和地面上跑步时下肢各节段的协调及其变异性。
20 名有活力的大学生参与了这项研究。每位参与者都进行了地面和跑步机慢、快速度的跑步试验。下肢各节段的三维运动学数据被捕获。连续相对相位(CRP)用于计算参与者优势侧下肢的足部、小腿和大腿节段的协调及其变异性(VCRP)。
使用统计参数映射(SPM)的向量分析显示,在跑步的支撑相以及在支撑相后期和摆动相的不同跑步速度下,跑步机和地面跑步的计算 CRP 存在统计学上的显著差异。然而,在这两个位置和速度下计算的 VCRP 没有表现出任何统计学上的显著差异。
本研究的结果表明,跑步机和地面跑步时节段之间的耦合差异可能会影响下肢的生物力学。此外,不同跑步速度下耦合模式的变化表明,在跑步者使用的训练速度范围内,节段协调并不稳定。最后,在不同速度下跑步机和地面条件下节段耦合的变异性没有差异,这可能表明在不同的跑步位置和速度下,具有相似的动态神经肌肉控制和自由度。