Université de Lorraine, Département de Chirurgie Viscérale, Métabolique et Cancérologique (CVMC), CHRU Nancy, Hopital de Brabois (7(ème) étage), Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.
Université de Lorraine, Département d'Endocrinologie, Diabétologie, Nutrition (EDN), CHRU Nancy, Hopital de Brabois, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.
Surgery. 2021 Jan;169(1):63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.03.029. Epub 2020 May 12.
Continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring may facilitate reversal of intraoperative injurious operative maneuvers in comparison with intermittent intraoperative neuromonitoring. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the routine use of continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring on intraoperative injuries to the recurrent laryngeal nerve.
This study was a prospective case series with retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing total thyroidectomy from August 2013 to August 2019. During this period, intermittent intraoperative neuromonitoring (before Mar 2016) and continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring (after Mar 2016) were used in all patients.
We reviewed the outcomes of 603 patients (466 female patients) comprising 236 who underwent intermittent intraoperative neuromonitoring and 367 who underwent continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring. Intraoperative adverse electromyography events (>50% decrease in amplitude between VN1 and VN2) were observed in 87 patients (14.5%) and were less frequent in the continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring group (10.6 vs 20.3%, P = .001). Intraoperative loss of signal (electromyography events with VN2 ≤100μV) were observed in 35 patients (5.8%) without any difference between the 2 groups of patients (5.2 vs 6.8%, P = .415). Postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsies were observed in 36 patients (5.9%) without any difference between the 2 groups of patients (4.9 vs 7.6%, P = .168).
The routine use of continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring improves the rate of intraoperative adverse electromyography events but does not impact significantly the rates of loss of signal and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy.
与间歇性术中神经监测相比,连续术中神经监测可能有助于逆转术中损伤性手术操作。本研究旨在评估常规使用连续术中神经监测对喉返神经术中损伤的影响。
这是一项前瞻性病例系列研究,对 2013 年 8 月至 2019 年 8 月连续行甲状腺全切除术的患者进行回顾性分析。在此期间,所有患者均采用间歇性术中神经监测(2016 年 3 月前)和连续术中神经监测(2016 年 3 月后)。
我们回顾了 603 例患者(466 例女性患者)的结局,其中 236 例行间歇性术中神经监测,367 例行连续术中神经监测。87 例(14.5%)患者术中出现不良肌电图事件(VN1 和 VN2 之间的振幅下降>50%),连续术中神经监测组的发生率较低(10.6%比 20.3%,P=0.001)。35 例(5.8%)患者术中出现信号丢失(肌电图事件 VN2≤100μV),两组间无差异(5.2%比 6.8%,P=0.415)。术后发生喉返神经麻痹 36 例(5.9%),两组间无差异(4.9%比 7.6%,P=0.168)。
常规使用连续术中神经监测可提高术中不良肌电图事件的发生率,但对信号丢失和喉返神经麻痹的发生率无显著影响。