Suppr超能文献

术中对喉返神经进行神经监测是否会对术后麻痹发生率产生影响?一项前瞻性多中心研究的结果。

Does intraoperative neuromonitoring of recurrent nerves have an impact on the postoperative palsy rate? Results of a prospective multicenter study.

作者信息

Mirallié Éric, Caillard Cécile, Pattou François, Brunaud Laurent, Hamy Antoine, Dahan Marcel, Prades Michel, Mathonnet Muriel, Landecy Gérard, Dernis Henri-Pierre, Lifante Jean-Christophe, Sebag Frederic, Jegoux Franck, Babin Emmanuel, Bizon Alain, Espitalier Florent, Durand-Zaleski Isabelle, Volteau Christelle, Blanchard Claire

机构信息

CHU de Nantes, Clinique de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne (CCDE), Nantes, France.

CHU de Nantes, Clinique de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne (CCDE), Nantes, France.

出版信息

Surgery. 2018 Jan;163(1):124-129. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.03.029. Epub 2017 Nov 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of intraoperative neuromonitoring on recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy remains debated. Our aim was to evaluate the potential protective effect of intraoperative neuromonitoring on recurrent laryngeal nerve during total thyroidectomy.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter French national study. The use of intraoperative neuromonitoring was left at the surgeons' choice. Postoperative laryngoscopy was performed systematically at day 1 to 2 after operation and at 6 months in case of postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. Univariate and multivariate analyses and propensity score (sensitivity analysis) were performed to compare recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy rates between patients operated with or without intraoperative neuromonitoring.

RESULTS

Among 1,328 patients included (females 79.9%, median age 51.2 years, median body mass index 25.6 kg/m), 807 (60.8%) underwent intraoperative neuromonitoring. Postoperative abnormal vocal cord mobility was diagnosed in 131 patients (9.92%), including 69 (8.6%) and 62 (12.1%) in the intraoperative neuromonitoring and nonintraoperative neuromonitoring groups, respectively. Intraoperative neuromonitoring was associated with a lesser rate of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy in univariate analysis (odds ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval, 0.47; 0.98, P = .04) but not in multivariate analysis (oddsratio = 0.74, 95% confidence interval, 0.47; 1.17, P = .19), or when using a propensity score (odds ratio = 0.76, 95% confidence interval, 0.53; 1.07, P = .11). There was no difference in the rates of definitive recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (0.8% and 1.3% in intraoperative neuromonitoring and non-intraoperative neuromonitoring groups respectively, P = .39). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of intraoperative neuromonitoring for detecting abnormal postoperative vocal cord mobility were 29%, 98%, 61%, and 94%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of intraoperative neuromonitoring does not decrease postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy rate. Due to its high specificity, however, intraoperative neuromonitoring is useful to predict normal vocal cord mobility. From the CHU de Nantes, Clinique de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne, Nantes, France; CHU Lille, Université de Lille, Chirurgie Générale et Endocrinienne, Lille, France; CHU Nancy-Hôpital de Brabois, Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hépato-Biliaire, et Endocrinienne, Nancy, France; CHU Angers, Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne, Angers, France; CHU de Toulouse-Hôpital Larrey, Chirurgie Thoracique, Pôle Voies Respiratoires, Toulouse; CHU Saint-Etienne-Hôpital Nord, ORL et Chirurgie Cervico-Faciale et Plastique, Saint-Etienne, France; CHU de Limoges-Hôpital Dupuytren, Chirurgie Digestive, Générale et Endocrinienne, Limoges, France; CHU de Besançon-Hôpital Jean Minjoz, Chirurgie Digestive, Besançon, France; Centre Hospitalier du Mans, Service ORL et Chirurgie Cervico-Faciale, Le Mans, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Chirurgie Générale, Endocrinienne, Digestive et Thoracique, Pierre Bénite, France; AP-HM-Hôpital de La Conception, Chirurgie Générale, Marseille, France; CHU de Rennes-Hôpital Pontchaillou, Service ORL et Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale, Rennes, France; CHU de Caen, ORL et Chirurgie Cervico-Faciale, Caen, France; CHU d'Angers, ORL et Chirurgie Cervico-Faciale, Angers, France; CHU de Nantes, Service ORL, Nantes, France; AP HP URCEco île-de-France, hôpital de l'Hôtel-Dieu, Paris, France; DRCI, département Promotion, Nantes, France.

摘要

背景

术中神经监测对喉返神经麻痹的影响仍存在争议。我们的目的是评估术中神经监测在全甲状腺切除术中对喉返神经的潜在保护作用。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、多中心的法国全国性研究。术中神经监测的使用由外科医生自行决定。术后第1至2天以及术后出现喉返神经麻痹时在6个月时系统地进行术后喉镜检查。进行单因素和多因素分析以及倾向评分(敏感性分析)以比较接受或未接受术中神经监测的患者之间喉返神经麻痹的发生率。

结果

在纳入的1328例患者中(女性占79.9%,中位年龄51.2岁,中位体重指数25.6kg/m),807例(60.8%)接受了术中神经监测。131例患者(9.92%)被诊断为术后声带运动异常,术中神经监测组和非术中神经监测组分别有69例(8.6%)和62例(12.1%)。在单因素分析中,术中神经监测与较低的喉返神经麻痹发生率相关(比值比=0.68,95%置信区间,0.47;0.98,P=0.04),但在多因素分析中不相关(比值比=0.74,95%置信区间,0.47;1.17,P=0.19),使用倾向评分时也不相关(比值比=0.76,95%置信区间,0.53;1.07,P=0.11)。永久性喉返神经麻痹的发生率没有差异(术中神经监测组和非术中神经监测组分别为0.8%和1.3%,P=0.39)。术中神经监测检测术后声带运动异常的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为29%、98%、61%和94%。

结论

术中神经监测的使用并不能降低术后喉返神经麻痹的发生率。然而,由于其高特异性,术中神经监测有助于预测声带运动正常。来自法国南特大学医院消化与内分泌外科;法国里尔大学里尔大学医院普通与内分泌外科;法国南锡-布拉博伊斯医院消化、肝胆与内分泌外科;法国昂热大学医院消化与内分泌外科;法国图卢兹-拉里医院胸外科、呼吸通路科;法国圣艾蒂安-北医院耳鼻喉科、头颈与整形外科;法国利摩日大学医院迪皮特朗医院消化、普通与内分泌外科;法国贝桑松大学医院让·明乔兹医院消化外科;法国勒芒中心医院耳鼻喉科与头颈外科;法国里昂南中心医院普通、内分泌、消化与胸外科;法国马赛阿维尼翁医院普通外科;法国雷恩大学医院庞沙鲁医院耳鼻喉科与颌面外科;法国卡昂大学医院耳鼻喉科与头颈外科;法国昂热大学医院耳鼻喉科与头颈外科;法国南特大学医院耳鼻喉科;法国巴黎公共卫生医院集团法兰西岛大区厄尔-卢瓦尔省医院迪厄医院;法国南特DRCI促进部。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验