• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区对性发育差异(DSD)诊断的看法:一项众包调查。

Community perspectives on difference of sex development (DSD) diagnoses: A crowdsourced survey.

机构信息

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Jun;16(3):384.e1-384.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.03.023. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.03.023
PMID:32409277
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7308206/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Differences of sex development (DSD) engender ethical, social and psychosexual complexities that can complicate medical decision-making. We performed a web-based pilot study to estimate the utility value of a DSD diagnosis and to identify community concerns regarding DSD management.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was posted on Amazon's Mechanical Turk, an online crowdsourcing platform. Respondents were ≥18y and were randomized to receive information on one of three common DSD conditions: Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH), Mixed Gonadal Dysgenesis (MGD), and Partial Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (PAIS). Time trade-off methodology was used to estimate utility values. Likert scale and statement-ranking questions were used to assess respondent perceptions.

RESULTS

Of 1,628 respondents, median age was 34y; most respondents were parents (59.1%), white (77.1%), and previously unfamiliar with DSD (60.4%). The median overall utility value was 0.70 (IQR 0.50-0.90), similar to moderately severe chronic health conditions. Utility estimates varied based on the DSD scenario presented (0.80 CAH vs. 0.70 MGD vs. 0.80 PAIS, p = 0.0006), respondent gender (p < 0.0001), race (p = 0.002), religion (p = 0.005), and prior knowledge of DSD (p < 0.0001). Reported concerns included gender identity (23.4%), urinary function (20.5%) and surgical complications (17.4%). Most (67.5%) supported early surgical intervention at 6-18 mo; 10.4% thought surgery should occur ≥18 y.

COMMENT

Limitations of this study include that survey participants were aware of the nature of the study, thus some respondents may have participated to skew the results. Given the nature of this pilot study, the representation of families with children with DSD within the study is severely limited given the rarity of DSDs. This means that their opinions may be diluted by the large sample size. However, because utility values are classically estimated according to community opinions, the utility data presented should be taken to reflect that of the specific sample studied and is not reflective of that of families with a vested interest in such cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Community-based respondents perceived that DSD conditions were associated with a reduction in utility values (0.70-0.80), on par with moderately severe chronic health conditions. Estimates varied based on respondents' gender, race, religion and prior knowledge of DSD. Gender identity was the most concerning aspect for respondents.

摘要

简介和目的

性别发育差异(DSD)引发了伦理、社会和心理性别方面的复杂性,这可能使医疗决策复杂化。我们进行了一项基于网络的试点研究,以评估 DSD 诊断的实用价值,并确定社区对 DSD 管理的关注。

方法

横断面调查发布在亚马逊的 Mechanical Turk 上,这是一个在线众包平台。受访者年龄≥18 岁,并随机分为三组,分别接受三种常见 DSD 情况的信息:先天性肾上腺增生症(CAH)、混合性性腺发育不良(MGD)和部分雄激素不敏感综合征(PAIS)。时间权衡方法用于估计实用价值。李克特量表和陈述排名问题用于评估受访者的看法。

结果

在 1628 名受访者中,中位年龄为 34 岁;大多数受访者是父母(59.1%),白人(77.1%),以前不了解 DSD(60.4%)。总体实用价值的中位数为 0.70(IQR 0.50-0.90),与中度严重的慢性健康状况相当。效用估计值因呈现的 DSD 情况而异(0.80 CAH 与 0.70 MGD 与 0.80 PAIS,p=0.0006),受访者性别(p<0.0001)、种族(p=0.002)、宗教(p=0.005)和对 DSD 的先验知识(p<0.0001)。报告的担忧包括性别认同(23.4%)、尿功能(20.5%)和手术并发症(17.4%)。大多数人(67.5%)支持在 6-18 个月时进行早期手术干预;10.4%的人认为手术应该在 18 岁以上进行。

评论

本研究的局限性包括调查参与者了解研究的性质,因此一些参与者可能参与其中以歪曲结果。鉴于本试点研究的性质,由于 DSD 的罕见性,研究中患有 DSD 儿童的家庭的代表性严重受限。这意味着他们的意见可能因样本量大而被稀释。然而,由于实用价值通常根据社区意见进行估计,因此提出的实用价值数据应反映特定样本的意见,而不是对有兴趣参与此类案例的家庭的意见。

结论

基于社区的受访者认为 DSD 状况与实用价值降低(0.70-0.80)相关,与中度严重的慢性健康状况相当。估计值因受访者的性别、种族、宗教信仰和对 DSD 的先验知识而异。性别认同是受访者最关心的方面。

相似文献

1
Community perspectives on difference of sex development (DSD) diagnoses: A crowdsourced survey.社区对性发育差异(DSD)诊断的看法:一项众包调查。
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Jun;16(3):384.e1-384.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.03.023. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
2
Gender identity disorder (GID) in adolescents and adults with differences of sex development (DSD): A systematic review and meta-analysis.青少年和成年期患有性发育差异(DSD)的性别认同障碍(GID):一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Feb;17(1):39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.11.017. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
3
Participation of adults with disorders/differences of sex development (DSD) in the clinical study dsd-LIFE: design, methodology, recruitment, data quality and study population.患有性发育障碍/差异(DSD)的成年人参与临床研究 dsd-LIFE:设计、方法学、招募、数据质量和研究人群。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2017 Aug 18;17(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12902-017-0198-y.
4
Gender Dysphoria and Gender Change in Disorders of Sex Development/Intersex Conditions: Results From the dsd-LIFE Study.性别焦虑和性别变化与性发育障碍/间性条件:来自 dsd-LIFE 研究的结果。
J Sex Med. 2018 May;15(5):777-785. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.02.021. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
5
Molecular diagnostics of disorders of sexual development: an Indian survey and systems biology perspective.性发育障碍的分子诊断:一项印度调查及系统生物学视角
Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2019 Apr;65(2):105-120. doi: 10.1080/19396368.2018.1549619. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
6
Crowdsourcing utility estimation for spina bifida in the general population.一般人群中脊柱裂的众包效用估计。
J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2017 Dec 11;10(3-4):257-266. doi: 10.3233/PRM-170453.
7
Clinical evaluation study of the German network of disorders of sex development (DSD)/intersexuality: study design, description of the study population, and data quality.德国性发育障碍(DSD)/双性畸形网络的临床评估研究:研究设计、研究人群描述及数据质量
BMC Public Health. 2009 Apr 21;9:110. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-110.
8
The challenges in diagnosis and gender assignment in disorders of sex development presenting to a pediatric surgical unit in a developing country: the role of laparoscopy and simple tests for gender identity.在发展中国家的儿科外科单位中,性发育障碍的诊断和性别指定面临挑战:腹腔镜和简单的性别认同测试的作用。
J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Dec;10(6):1255-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.06.021. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
9
Initial assessment of a child with suspected disorder of sex development.对疑似性发育障碍儿童的初步评估。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2019 May;69(5):711-717.
10
Gender dysphoria associated with disorders of sex development.性别焦虑与性发育障碍相关。
Nat Rev Urol. 2012 Nov;9(11):620-7. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2012.182. Epub 2012 Oct 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Caring for individuals with a difference of sex development (DSD): a Consensus Statement.关爱性发育差异(DSD)个体:共识声明。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018 Jul;14(7):415-429. doi: 10.1038/s41574-018-0010-8.
2
Multicentre cross-sectional clinical evaluation study about quality of life in adults with disorders/differences of sex development (DSD) compared to country specific reference populations (dsd-LIFE).多中心横断面临床评估研究,比较患有性别发育障碍/差异(DSD)的成年人与特定国家参考人群(dsd-LIFE)的生活质量。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Apr 3;16(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0881-3.
3
Gender Dysphoria and Gender Change in Disorders of Sex Development/Intersex Conditions: Results From the dsd-LIFE Study.性别焦虑和性别变化与性发育障碍/间性条件:来自 dsd-LIFE 研究的结果。
J Sex Med. 2018 May;15(5):777-785. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.02.021. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
4
Estimating Health-State Utility for Economic Models in Clinical Studies: An ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force Report.临床研究中经济模型的健康状态效用评估:一份药物经济学与结果研究协会良好研究实践特别工作组报告
Value Health. 2016 Sep-Oct;19(6):704-719. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.06.001.
5
Surgery in disorders of sex development (DSD) with a gender issue: If (why), when, and how?性别发育障碍(DSD)相关外科手术中的性别问题:是否(为什么)、何时以及如何手术?
J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Jun;12(3):139-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Apr 9.
6
An examination of the equivalency of self-report measures obtained from crowdsourced versus undergraduate student samples.对从众包样本与本科生样本中获得的自我报告测量方法的等效性进行检验。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Feb;49(1):320-334. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0710-8.
7
Conducting Clinical Research Using Crowdsourced Convenience Samples.利用众包便利样本进行临床研究。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:53-81. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093623. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
8
Utility scores for vesicoureteral reflux and anti-reflux surgery.膀胱输尿管反流及抗反流手术的效用评分
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Aug;11(4):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
9
Challenges to time trade-off utility assessment methods: when should you consider alternative approaches?时间权衡效用评估方法面临的挑战:何时应考虑采用替代方法?
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Jun;14(3):437-50. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.912562.
10
Germ cell cancer risk in DSD patients.性发育障碍(DSD)患者的生殖细胞癌风险。
Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2014 May;75(2):67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ando.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 29.