Suppr超能文献

时间权衡效用评估方法面临的挑战:何时应考虑采用替代方法?

Challenges to time trade-off utility assessment methods: when should you consider alternative approaches?

作者信息

Boye Kristina S, Matza Louis S, Feeny David H, Johnston Joseph A, Bowman Lee, Jordan Jessica B

机构信息

Global Health Outcomes, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, DC 2142, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Jun;14(3):437-50. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.912562.

Abstract

In recent years, the time trade-off (TTO) method, most commonly with a 10-year time horizon, has been the most frequently used approach for direct health state utility assessment, likely due to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) preference for comparability with the EQ-5D, which has a utility scoring algorithm derived via this method. Although comparability to previous utility studies is important, there are situations when the TTO method may not be appropriate. The purpose of the current review is to highlight challenges to the TTO method. Five challenges to the TTO method are discussed: mild health states, small differences among health states, temporary health states, pediatric health states, and assessment of samples with particular characteristics. Some of these challenges are associated with the 10-year time horizon, while other situations may raise issues for TTO methods regardless of the time horizon. Alternative approaches for valuing health states are suggested.

摘要

近年来,时间权衡(TTO)方法,最常见的是设定10年的时间跨度,一直是直接健康状态效用评估中使用最频繁的方法,这可能是因为英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)倾向于与EQ-5D具有可比性,EQ-5D的效用评分算法就是通过这种方法推导出来的。虽然与之前的效用研究具有可比性很重要,但在某些情况下,TTO方法可能并不适用。本综述的目的是强调TTO方法面临的挑战。文中讨论了TTO方法面临的五个挑战:轻度健康状态、健康状态之间的微小差异、临时健康状态、儿科健康状态以及对具有特定特征样本的评估。其中一些挑战与10年的时间跨度有关,而其他情况可能会给TTO方法带来问题,无论时间跨度如何。文中还提出了评估健康状态的替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验