• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人群的遗传检测用于精准预防。

Population-based Genetic Testing for Precision Prevention.

机构信息

Wolfson Institute of Preventative Medicine, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Aug;13(8):643-648. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0002. Epub 2020 May 14.

DOI:10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0002
PMID:32409595
Abstract

Global interest in genetic testing for cancer susceptibility genes (CSG) has surged with falling costs, increasing awareness, and celebrity endorsement. Current access to genetic testing is based on clinical criteria/risk model assessment which uses family history as a surrogate. However, this approach is fraught with inequality, massive underutilization, and misses 50% CSG carriers. This reflects huge missed opportunities for precision prevention. Early CSG identification enables uptake of risk-reducing strategies in unaffected individuals to reduce cancer risk. Population-based genetic testing (PGT) can overcome limitations of clinical criteria/family history-based testing. Jewish population studies show population-based testing is feasible, acceptable, has high satisfaction, does not harm psychologic well-being/quality of life, and is extremely cost-effective, arguing for changing paradigm to PGT in the Jewish population. Innovative approaches for delivering pretest information/education are needed to facilitate informed decision-making for PGT. Different health systems will need context-specific implementation strategies and management pathways, while maintaining principles of population screening. Data on general population PGT are beginning to emerge, prompting evaluation of wider implementation. Sophisticated risk prediction models incorporating genetic and nongenetic data are being used to stratify populations for ovarian cancer and breast cancer risk and risk-adapted screening/prevention. PGT is potentially cost-effective for panel testing of breast and ovarian CSGs and for risk-adapted breast cancer screening. Further research/implementation studies evaluating the impact, clinical efficacy, psychologic and socio-ethical consequences, and cost-effectiveness of PGT are needed.

摘要

全球对癌症易感性基因(CSG)遗传检测的兴趣随着成本的降低、意识的提高和名人的认可而飙升。目前的遗传检测是基于临床标准/风险模型评估,该评估使用家族史作为替代。然而,这种方法存在不平等、大量未充分利用以及错过 50% CSG 携带者的问题。这反映了精准预防的巨大机会错失。早期 CSG 识别使未受影响的个体能够接受降低风险的策略,从而降低癌症风险。基于人群的遗传检测(PGT)可以克服临床标准/家族史检测的局限性。犹太人的研究表明,基于人群的检测是可行的、可接受的、满意度高的,不会损害心理幸福感/生活质量,并且具有极高的成本效益,这为犹太人改变基于人群的检测模式提供了依据。需要创新的方法来提供检测前信息/教育,以促进知情决策。不同的卫生系统将需要特定于上下文的实施策略和管理途径,同时保持人群筛查的原则。关于一般人群 PGT 的数据开始出现,促使对更广泛的实施进行评估。复杂的风险预测模型结合了遗传和非遗传数据,用于对卵巢癌和乳腺癌风险以及风险适应的筛查/预防进行人群分层。PGT 对于乳腺癌和卵巢 CSG 的面板检测以及风险适应的乳腺癌筛查具有潜在的成本效益。需要进一步研究/实施研究来评估 PGT 的影响、临床疗效、心理和社会伦理后果以及成本效益。

相似文献

1
Population-based Genetic Testing for Precision Prevention.基于人群的遗传检测用于精准预防。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Aug;13(8):643-648. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0002. Epub 2020 May 14.
2
Population-based genetic testing for Women's cancer prevention.基于人群的女性癌症预防遗传检测。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 May;65:139-153. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.02.007. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
3
Cost-effectiveness of population screening for BRCA mutations in Ashkenazi jewish women compared with family history-based testing.与基于家族史检测相比,对阿什肯纳兹犹太妇女进行BRCA突变群体筛查的成本效益。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Nov 30;107(1):380. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju380. Print 2015 Jan.
4
Cost Effectiveness of Whole Population BRCA Genetic Screening for Cancer Prevention in Israel.以色列全民 BRCA 基因筛查预防癌症的成本效益分析。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 Apr;14(4):455-462. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0411. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
5
BRCA genetic testing of individuals from families with low prevalence of cancer: experiences of carriers and implications for population screening.家族中癌症发病率低的个体的 BRCA 基因检测:携带者的经验及对人群筛查的意义。
Genet Med. 2012 Jul;14(7):688-94. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.31.
6
Cost-effectiveness of BRCA1 testing at time of obstetrical prenatal carrier screening for cancer prevention.BRCA1 检测在妇产科产前携带者筛查预防癌症中的成本效益。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Sep;231(3):330.e1-330.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.014. Epub 2024 Apr 14.
7
Costs and benefits of diagnosing familial breast cancer.诊断家族性乳腺癌的成本与效益
Dis Markers. 1999 Oct;15(1-3):167-73. doi: 10.1155/1999/751892.
8
Genetic screening for gynecological cancer: where are we heading?妇科癌症的基因筛查:我们正走向何方?
Future Oncol. 2016 Jan;12(2):207-20. doi: 10.2217/fon.15.278. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
9
Which BRCA genetic testing programs are ready for implementation in health care? A systematic review of economic evaluations.哪些BRCA基因检测项目已准备好在医疗保健中实施?一项经济评估的系统综述。
Genet Med. 2016 Dec;18(12):1171-1180. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.29. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
10
Cost-effectiveness of Ovarian Cancer Prevention Strategies.卵巢癌预防策略的成本效益
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;60(4):780-788. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000317.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining Lifetime Risk Thresholds for Breast Cancer Surgical Prevention.确定乳腺癌手术预防的终身风险阈值。
JAMA Oncol. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.2203.
2
Overcoming Barriers in Cancer Biology Research: Current Limitations and Solutions.克服癌症生物学研究中的障碍:当前的局限性与解决方案
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 23;17(13):2102. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132102.
3
Prospective changes in primary care patients' family communication after skin cancer genetic test offer.皮肤癌基因检测提供后,初级保健患者家庭沟通的前瞻性变化。
PEC Innov. 2025 Jun 7;7:100409. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100409. eCollection 2025 Dec.
4
Screening Familial Risk for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.筛查遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌的家族风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2435901. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.35901.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Gene-Specific Prevention Strategies for Ovarian and Breast Cancer.卵巢癌和乳腺癌基因特异性预防策略的成本效益分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2355324. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.55324.
6
A mainstreaming oncogenomics model: improving the identification of Lynch syndrome.一种主流的肿瘤基因组学模型:改善林奇综合征的识别
Front Oncol. 2023 May 26;13:1140135. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1140135. eCollection 2023.
7
Combinatorial batching of DNA for ultralow-cost detection of pathogenic variants.组合式 DNA 分批处理,用于超低成本检测致病变体。
Genome Med. 2023 Mar 14;15(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13073-023-01167-6.
8
Interest in genetic testing and risk-reducing behavioral changes: results from a community health assessment in New York City.对基因检测及降低风险的行为改变的关注:纽约市社区健康评估结果
J Community Genet. 2022 Dec;13(6):605-617. doi: 10.1007/s12687-022-00610-2. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
9
Barriers and Facilitators for Population Genetic Screening in Healthy Populations: A Systematic Review.健康人群中群体遗传筛查的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述
Front Genet. 2022 Jul 4;13:865384. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.865384. eCollection 2022.
10
Randomised trial of population-based BRCA testing in Ashkenazi Jews: long-term secondary lifestyle behavioural outcomes.基于人群的 BRCA 检测在阿什肯纳兹犹太人中的随机试验:长期的次要生活方式行为结果。
BJOG. 2022 Nov;129(12):1970-1980. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17253. Epub 2022 Jul 13.