• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用激光共聚焦扫描显微镜测量定制舌侧托槽上的树脂残留。

The use of the laser confocal scanning microscopy to measure resin remnants on customized lingual bracket.

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, University of Padova, via Giustiniani 2 -, 35100, Padova, Italy.

Department of Geoscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2020 May 14;20(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01132-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-020-01132-4
PMID:32410609
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7226939/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to evaluate the permanence of resin and enamel remains on lingual brackets at the end of orthodontic treatment and after the debonding procedure. The evaluation of resin remnants on customized lingual brackets bases has never done before in other studies because they are curved, and traditional techniques are not applicable.

METHODS

The sample consisted of 100 lingual brackets (25 incisors, 25 canines, 25 premolars, 25 molars) scanned with a confocal laser microscope (OLS4000). We measured the brackets' surface and the area of resin remnants with the software of the microscope. Median and quartiles were presented to describe the data. ARI calculation was indirect for each tooth, measuring the resin remnants to the total surface of the bracket. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Fisher test were applied respectively to compare the percentages of remnants and the frequencies of the ARI between the four groups.

RESULTS

After the analyses, 13 brackets had no adhesive remnants (ARI 0), 29 brackets had less than 50% of resin remnants (ARI 1), 50 brackets had more than 50% of resin remnants (ARI 2), and 8 brackets had 100% of adhesive (ARI 3). Canines brackets presented the lower amount of resin followed by premolars, incisors, and molars.

CONCLUSION

Lingual brackets showed a high frequency of ARI = 2. The median percentage of the bracket surface covered by resin was 41%. We observed a slight tendency of more resin remnants on molar brackets, due to half-pad configuration. The authors suggest paying attention during the debonding procedure of molar brackets since a stronger connection between the adhesive and the bracket mesh means a higher risk of enamel damage.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估正畸治疗结束和去带后舌侧托槽上残留树脂和牙釉质的持久性。由于舌侧托槽基底是弯曲的,传统技术不适用,因此之前从未在其他研究中评估过定制舌侧托槽基底上的树脂残留情况。

方法

本研究使用共聚焦激光显微镜(OLS4000)对 100 个舌侧托槽(25 个切牙、25 个尖牙、25 个前磨牙、25 个磨牙)进行扫描。我们使用显微镜软件测量托槽表面和残留树脂的面积。中位数和四分位数用于描述数据。为了对每个牙齿进行间接 ARI 计算,将树脂残留量与托槽的总表面积进行比较。分别应用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和 Fisher 检验比较四组之间的残留百分比和 ARI 频率。

结果

经过分析,有 13 个托槽没有残留胶(ARI = 0),29 个托槽的残留树脂少于 50%(ARI = 1),50 个托槽的残留树脂超过 50%(ARI = 2),8 个托槽的残留树脂达到 100%(ARI = 3)。尖牙托槽的残留树脂量最低,其次是前磨牙、切牙和磨牙。

结论

舌侧托槽的 ARI = 2 频率较高。残留树脂覆盖托槽表面的中位数百分比为 41%。我们观察到磨牙托槽上的残留树脂略多,这可能是由于半翼片的配置所致。作者建议在去带处理磨牙托槽时要格外注意,因为胶与托槽网之间的连接越强,牙釉质损伤的风险就越高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d7a/7226939/6b3047fe2941/12903_2020_1132_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d7a/7226939/436c8b09a81a/12903_2020_1132_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d7a/7226939/b364c8e3293f/12903_2020_1132_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d7a/7226939/2638397edf3d/12903_2020_1132_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d7a/7226939/bbc17a7e88a8/12903_2020_1132_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d7a/7226939/43b98f95caba/12903_2020_1132_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d7a/7226939/6b3047fe2941/12903_2020_1132_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d7a/7226939/436c8b09a81a/12903_2020_1132_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d7a/7226939/b364c8e3293f/12903_2020_1132_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d7a/7226939/2638397edf3d/12903_2020_1132_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d7a/7226939/bbc17a7e88a8/12903_2020_1132_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d7a/7226939/43b98f95caba/12903_2020_1132_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d7a/7226939/6b3047fe2941/12903_2020_1132_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The use of the laser confocal scanning microscopy to measure resin remnants on customized lingual bracket.使用激光共聚焦扫描显微镜测量定制舌侧托槽上的树脂残留。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 May 14;20(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01132-4.
2
Loss of surface enamel after bracket debonding: an in-vivo and ex-vivo evaluation.托槽拆除后表层釉质的丧失:一项体内和体外评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Oct;138(4):387.e1-387.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.01.028.
3
Comparison of Bond Strength of Brackets with Foil Mesh and Laser Structure Base using Light Cure Composite Resin: An in vitro Study.使用光固化复合树脂比较带箔网和激光结构基底的托槽的粘结强度:一项体外研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015 Dec 1;16(12):963-70. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1789.
4
Er:YAG Laser for Metal and Ceramic Bracket Debonding: An In Vitro Study on Intrapulpal Temperature, SEM, and EDS Analysis.铒激光用于金属和陶瓷托槽脱粘:关于牙髓腔内温度、扫描电子显微镜及能谱分析的体外研究
Photomed Laser Surg. 2018 Nov;36(11):595-600. doi: 10.1089/pho.2017.4412. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
5
Comparison of bond strength between simple foil mesh and laser-structured base retention brackets.简单箔网与激光结构化基底固位托槽之间粘结强度的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Sep;122(3):260-6. doi: 10.1067/mod.2002.125834.
6
Three-dimensional quantification of adhesive remnants on teeth after debonding.脱粘后牙齿上粘结剂残余物的三维定量分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Oct;134(4):556-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.027.
7
Debonding force and shear bond strength of an array of CAD/CAM-based customized orthodontic brackets, placed by indirect bonding- An In Vitro study.基于 CAD/CAM 的定制式正畸托槽排的离解力和剪切粘结强度,通过间接粘结法放置-一项体外研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 11;13(9):e0202952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202952. eCollection 2018.
8
Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.两种传统树脂黏合剂与一种树脂增强型玻璃离子水门汀之间托槽脱黏力的比较:一项体外和体内研究。
Angle Orthod. 1999 Oct;69(5):463-9. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0463:COBDFB>2.3.CO;2.
9
An in vitro comparison of ultraviolet versus white light in the detection of adhesive remnants during orthodontic debonding.在正畸去粘接过程中,比较紫外线与白光检测粘接残留的体外研究。
Angle Orthod. 2019 May;89(3):438-445. doi: 10.2319/072018-526.1. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
10
The effect of freezing on the fracture pattern of adhesive on debonding: an study.冷冻对胶接脱粘断裂模式的影响:一项研究。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 May;48(3):31-36. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.056. Epub 2024 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Cement Remaining After Debonding and Polishing in Lingual Multibracket Appliance Using Planning Imaging 3D Software.使用规划成像3D软件评估舌侧多托槽矫治器脱粘和抛光后残留的粘固剂
Materials (Basel). 2025 Feb 11;18(4):781. doi: 10.3390/ma18040781.
2
Use of optical coherence tomography in orthodontics.光学相干断层扫描技术在正畸学中的应用。
Exp Ther Med. 2021 Dec;22(6):1424. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10859. Epub 2021 Oct 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Debonding force and shear bond strength of an array of CAD/CAM-based customized orthodontic brackets, placed by indirect bonding- An In Vitro study.基于 CAD/CAM 的定制式正畸托槽排的离解力和剪切粘结强度,通过间接粘结法放置-一项体外研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 11;13(9):e0202952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202952. eCollection 2018.
2
Modern Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy.现代激光扫描共聚焦显微镜
Curr Protoc Cytom. 2018 Jul;85(1):e39. doi: 10.1002/cpcy.39. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
3
The effect of various adhesives, enamel etching, and base treatment on the failure frequency of customized lingual brackets: a randomized clinical trial.
不同粘合剂、牙釉质酸蚀处理及基底处理对定制舌侧托槽失败频率的影响:一项随机临床试验
Eur J Orthod. 2018 May 25;40(3):249-253. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx055.
4
Debonding forces of different pads in a lingual bracket system.舌侧托槽系统中不同托垫的脱粘力
Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Jul-Aug;22(4):34-40. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.4.034-040.oar.
5
Bracket base remnants after orthodontic debonding.托槽底座残片在正畸去带后。
Angle Orthod. 2013 Sep;83(5):885-91. doi: 10.2319/121112-930.1. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
6
Introduction to confocal microscopy.共聚焦显微镜简介。
J Invest Dermatol. 2012 Dec;132(12):e3. doi: 10.1038/jid.2012.429.
7
Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy.托槽去除后牙釉质表面评估:扫描电镜的体内研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Nov;140(5):696-702. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.02.027.
8
A comparative study of lingual bracket bond strength.舌侧托槽粘结强度的比较研究。
Orthodontics (Chic.). 2011 Fall;12(3):178-87.
9
Loss of surface enamel after bracket debonding: an in-vivo and ex-vivo evaluation.托槽拆除后表层釉质的丧失:一项体内和体外评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Oct;138(4):387.e1-387.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.01.028.
10
Shear bond strength of self-ligating brackets.自锁托槽的抗剪粘接强度。
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Feb;33(1):71-4. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq041. Epub 2010 Jul 21.