Colsman Angela, Supp Gernot G, Neumann Joachim, Schneider Till R
Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sonormed GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 29;11:744. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00744. eCollection 2020.
Quantifying hearing thresholds via mobile self-assessment audiometric applications has been demonstrated repeatedly with heterogenous results regarding the accuracy. One important limitation of several of these applications has been the lack of appropriate calibration of their core technical components (sound generator and headphones). The current study aimed at evaluating accuracy and reliability of a calibrated application (app) for pure-tone screening audiometry by self-assessment on a tablet computer: Audimatch app installed on Apple iPad 4 in combination with Sennheiser HDA-280 headphones. In a repeated-measures design audiometric thresholds collected by the app were compared to those obtained by standardized automated audiometry and additionally test-retest reliability was evaluated. Sixty-eight participants aged 19-65 years with normal hearing were tested in a sound-attenuating booth. An equivalence test revealed highly similar hearing thresholds for the app compared with standardized automated audiometry. A test-retest reliability analysis within each method showed a high correlation coefficient for the app (Spearman rank correlation: rho = 0.829) and for the automated audiometer (rho = 0.792). The results imply that the self-assessment of audiometric thresholds via a calibrated mobile device represents a valid and reliable alternative for stationary assessment of hearing loss thresholds, supporting the potential usability within the area of occupational health care.
通过移动自我评估听力测试应用程序来量化听力阈值已被反复证明,但在准确性方面结果各异。其中一些应用程序的一个重要局限性在于其核心技术组件(声音发生器和耳机)缺乏适当校准。当前研究旨在通过在平板电脑上进行自我评估来评估一款经过校准的纯音筛查听力测试应用程序(应用)的准确性和可靠性:安装在苹果iPad 4上的Audimatch应用程序与森海塞尔HDA - 280耳机配合使用。在重复测量设计中,将该应用程序收集的听力阈值与通过标准化自动听力测试获得的阈值进行比较,并额外评估了重测可靠性。68名年龄在19 - 65岁、听力正常的参与者在隔音室中接受测试。等效性测试显示,与标准化自动听力测试相比,该应用程序的听力阈值高度相似。每种方法内部的重测可靠性分析表明,该应用程序(斯皮尔曼等级相关性:rho = 0.829)和自动听力计(rho = 0.792)的相关系数都很高。结果表明,通过经过校准的移动设备进行听力阈值的自我评估是一种用于固定评估听力损失阈值的有效且可靠的替代方法,这支持了其在职业卫生保健领域的潜在可用性。