文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

使用消费级耳机的基于应用程序的听力计的准确性和可靠性:正常听力组的纯音听力测试

The accuracy and reliability of an app-based audiometer using consumer headphones: pure tone audiometry in a normal hearing group.

作者信息

Corry Megan, Sanders Michael, Searchfield Grant D

机构信息

a Section of Audiology, School of Population Health , University of Auckland , Auckland , New Zealand and.

b Esidell Moore Centre, University of Auckland , Auckland , New Zealand.

出版信息

Int J Audiol. 2017 Sep;56(9):706-710. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1321791. Epub 2017 May 9.


DOI:10.1080/14992027.2017.1321791
PMID:28485673
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To undertake a preliminary evaluation of the test-retest reliability, and accuracy of an iPad audiometer app using commercial earphones as a low-cost alternative to a clinical audiometer in a restricted sample of normal hearing participants. DESIGN: Twenty participants self-reporting normal hearing undertook four pure-tone audiometry tests in a single session. Two tests were performed with a 2-channel Type 1 audiometer (GSI-61) using EAR insert earphones and two tests with an iPad based app (Audiogram Mobile) using Apple earbud headphones. STUDY SAMPLE: Twenty normal hearing participants (13 female and seven male participants, aged 21-26 years) were recruited for the test-retest and accuracy evaluations. RESULTS: The app resulted in different thresholds to the audiometer (F(1, 19) = 16.635, p < 0.001). However test-retest reliability was similar. The app froze or quit unexpectedly over 25% of times used. CONCLUSIONS: Audiometer apps have great potential for clinical settings, especially in resource scarce environments, but reliability should not be assumed. While a low cost-alternative to standard transducers, issues of accuracy and calibration of consumer headphones need to be addressed before such combinations can be used with confidence.

摘要

目的:在听力正常的有限样本参与者中,对一款使用商用耳机的iPad听力计应用程序进行重测信度和准确性的初步评估,作为临床听力计的低成本替代方案。 设计:20名自称听力正常的参与者在一次测试中进行了四项纯音听力测试。两项测试使用配备EAR插入式耳机的双通道1型听力计(GSI - 61)进行,另外两项测试使用基于iPad的应用程序(Audiogram Mobile)并搭配苹果耳塞式耳机进行。 研究样本:招募了20名听力正常的参与者(13名女性和7名男性,年龄在21 - 26岁之间)进行重测和准确性评估。 结果:该应用程序得出的阈值与听力计不同(F(1, 19) = 16.635,p < 0.001)。然而,重测信度相似。该应用程序在超过25%的使用次数中意外冻结或退出。 结论:听力计应用程序在临床环境中具有巨大潜力,尤其是在资源匮乏的环境中,但不应假定其可靠性。虽然是标准换能器的低成本替代方案,但在能够放心使用此类组合之前,需要解决消费级耳机的准确性和校准问题。

相似文献

[1]
The accuracy and reliability of an app-based audiometer using consumer headphones: pure tone audiometry in a normal hearing group.

Int J Audiol. 2017-9

[2]
Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.

Ear Hear. 2018

[3]
Evaluation of Accuracy and Reliability of a Mobile Screening Audiometer in Normal Hearing Adults.

Front Psychol. 2020-4-29

[4]
Self-administered hearing loss screening using an interactive, tablet play audiometer with ear bud headphones.

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015-8

[5]
Self-assessment of bone conduction hearing threshold using mobile audiometry: comparison with pure tone audiometry.

Int J Audiol. 2024-7

[6]
Accuracy of Smartphone Self-Hearing Test Applications Across Frequencies and Earphone Styles in Adults.

Am J Audiol. 2018-12-6

[7]
High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria.

Ear Hear. 2012

[8]
Calibration and initial validation of a low-cost computer-based screening audiometer coupled to consumer insert phone-earmuff combination for boothless audiometry.

Int J Audiol. 2022-10

[9]
Evaluating the Reliability of 'AudiClick': A Click-Based Mobile App for Hearing Loss.

Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2024-7

[10]
Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer.

J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019-11-7

引用本文的文献

[1]
Usability of a hearing test mobile app across generations.

PLoS One. 2025-7-29

[2]
Editorial: Trends in digital hearing health and computational audiology.

Front Neurosci. 2024-11-26

[3]
Impact of Language Barriers and Age on English Hearing Test App Accuracy for Polish Users.

OTO Open. 2024-11-19

[4]
Accuracy and Pitfalls in the Smartphone-Based Audiometry Examination.

Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2024-3

[5]
Comparisons of air-conduction hearing thresholds between manual and automated methods in a commercial audiometer.

Front Neurosci. 2023-12-21

[6]
AMTASTM and user-operated smartphone research application audiometry-An evaluation study.

PLoS One. 2023

[7]
Clinical comparison of two automated audiometry procedures.

Front Neurosci. 2022-10-11

[8]
Acceptability of the Wulira app in assessing occupational hearing loss among workers in a steel and iron manufacturing industry.

PLoS One. 2022

[9]
Analytical methods for evaluating reliability and validity of mobile audiometry tools.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2022-7

[10]
Digital Approaches to Automated and Machine Learning Assessments of Hearing: Scoping Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2022-2-2

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索