• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国法医从业者的强制认证:一种支持性观点。

Mandatory certification of forensic science practitioners in the United States: A supportive perspective.

作者信息

Melbourn Haley, Smith Gabriella, McFarland Jessica, Rogers Melissa, Wieland Kelsey, DeWilde Delilah, Lighthart Sarah, Quinn Matthew, Baxter Alexis, Quarino Lawrence

机构信息

Master of Science in Forensic Science Program, Cedar Crest College, Allentown, PA, 18104, USA.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2019 Aug 7;1:161-169. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.08.001. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.08.001
PMID:32411969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7219122/
Abstract

The article presented is supportive of mandatory certification of forensic scientists and believes that such a mandate can help establish a threshold for competency in the profession, provide a universal standard for ethical professional conduct, and enhance the credibility of forensic science in users of the profession and the general societal public. After examining the history of professional certification in the United States across a spectrum of professions including forensic science, results of surveys sent to forensic science practitioners to gauge their views on mandatory certification is discussed. Seventy-three surveys were received with most surveyors being in support of mandatory certification related to their discipline. Reasons why many practitioners have chosen not to engage in voluntary certification were also provided on the surveys and discussed. Finally, the article discusses possible ways of implementing mandatory certification and concludes that the mechanisms to achieve this goal may already be in place.

摘要

所呈现的这篇文章支持对法医科学家进行强制认证,并认为这样一项规定有助于确立该职业的能力门槛,为符合职业道德的专业行为提供通用标准,以及提高法医学在该职业使用者和广大社会公众中的可信度。在审视了美国包括法医学在内的一系列职业的专业认证历史之后,文章讨论了向法医科学从业者发送的调查问卷的结果,以衡量他们对强制认证的看法。共收到73份调查问卷,大多数调查对象支持与其学科相关的强制认证。调查问卷还提供并讨论了许多从业者选择不参与自愿认证的原因。最后,文章讨论了实施强制认证的可能方式,并得出结论认为实现这一目标的机制可能已经存在。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/416c/7219122/cc853cb31546/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/416c/7219122/cc853cb31546/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/416c/7219122/cc853cb31546/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Mandatory certification of forensic science practitioners in the United States: A supportive perspective.美国法医从业者的强制认证:一种支持性观点。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2019 Aug 7;1:161-169. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.08.001. eCollection 2019.
2
Certification Programs for Criminalists - Historical Development.
Forensic Sci Rev. 2008 Jan;20(1):19-43.
3
Commentary on: Quarino et al. Mandatory certification of forensic science practitioners in the United States: A supportive perspective. Forensic science international: Synergy 2019; 1(1): 161-169.对以下文献的评论:夸里诺等人。美国法医科学从业者的强制认证:支持性观点。《法医学国际:协同作用》2019年;1(1):161 - 169。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2019 Oct 3;1:307. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.09.007. eCollection 2019.
4
The revitalization of U.S. dental education.美国牙科教育的振兴。
J Dent Educ. 2008 Feb;72(2 Suppl):28-42.
5
Progressing the Certification of the Medical Science Workforce.推进医学专业人员的认证工作。
Clin Biochem Rev. 2018 Feb;39(1):29-36.
6
Toward generally accepted forensic assessment practices among clinical neuropsychologists: a survey of professional practice and common test use.迈向临床神经心理学家普遍接受的法医评估实践:专业实践和常见测试使用的调查。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2018 Jan;32(1):145-164. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2017.1346711. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
7
The psychiatric certification examination in Canada and the United States: views of two recent candidates.
Can J Psychiatry. 1982 Aug;27(5):415-8. doi: 10.1177/070674378202700511.
8
The future of forensic and crime scene science. Part II. A UK perspective on forensic science education.法医与犯罪现场科学的未来。第二部分。英国对法医学教育的看法。
Forensic Sci Int. 2006 Mar 14;157 Suppl 1:S13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.12.023. Epub 2006 Jan 23.
9
The Purpose, Process, and Advancement of Forensic Nursing Standards.法医护理标准的目的、过程和进展。
J Forensic Nurs. 2024;20(3):160-165. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000488. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
10
A Standard of Knowledge for the Professional Practice of Toxicology.毒理学专业实践的知识标准。
Environ Health Perspect. 2015 Aug;123(8):743-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1408643. Epub 2015 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Areas of modernization of the system of training and certification of forensic experts in Ukraine based on the adaptation of foreign experience.基于借鉴国外经验的乌克兰法医专家培训与认证体系现代化领域。
Forensic Sci Res. 2024 Jul 2;9(4):owae033. doi: 10.1093/fsr/owae033. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Interpol review of forensic management, 2019-2022.国际刑警组织对法医管理的审查,2019 - 2022年
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2023 Jan 6;6:100301. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100301. eCollection 2023.
3
The Relationship between Research and Casework in Forensic Entomology.

本文引用的文献

1
Jurors' perceptions of forensic science expert witnesses: Experience, qualifications, testimony style and credibility.陪审员对法庭科学专家证人的看法:经验、资质、证言风格和可信度。
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Oct;291:100-108. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.07.030. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
2
The important role of medical licensure in the United States.美国医疗执照的重要作用。
Acad Med. 2010 Nov;85(11):1657; author reply 1657-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f557ed.
3
Professionalism and accountability: the role of specialty board certification.
法医昆虫学中研究与实际案例工作的关系。
Insects. 2021 Feb 17;12(2):174. doi: 10.3390/insects12020174.
4
Interpol review of forensic science management literature 2016-2019.国际刑警组织对2016 - 2019年法医学管理文献的综述
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 Mar 4;2:382-388. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.01.007. eCollection 2020.
5
Commentary on: Quarino et al. Mandatory certification of forensic science practitioners in the United States: A supportive perspective. Forensic science international: Synergy 2019; 1(1): 161-169.对以下文献的评论:夸里诺等人。美国法医科学从业者的强制认证:支持性观点。《法医学国际:协同作用》2019年;1(1):161 - 169。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2019 Oct 3;1:307. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.09.007. eCollection 2019.
专业精神与问责制:专科委员会认证的作用
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2008;119:295-303; discussion 303-4.
4
Medical licensing examinations in the United States.
J Dent Educ. 2002 May;66(5):595-9; discussion 610-1.
5
DNA fingerprinting on trial.受审的DNA指纹识别技术
Nature. 1989 Jun 15;339(6225):501-5. doi: 10.1038/339501a0.