Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Epilepsia. 2020 Jun;61(6):1183-1189. doi: 10.1111/epi.16529. Epub 2020 May 15.
To describe the development of the Stereotactic Laser Ablation for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy study protocol in the context of current practice. An ideal treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy remains an ongoing area of research. Although there are several options available, each has challenges that not only make deciding on the appropriate treatment not clear-cut but also create difficulties in designing clinical studies to provide evidence in support of the treatment.
A prospective, single-arm, multicenter study designed to evaluate safety and efficacy of the Visualase MRI-Guided Laser Ablation System for the treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy will include up to 150 patients with a primary efficacy endpoint of seizure freedom (defined as Engel Class I) for the first 12 months following the procedure and a primary safety endpoint of incidence of qualifying device-, procedure-, or anesthesia-related adverse events through 12 months following the procedure.
Primary endpoints will be assessed against historical values of safety and efficacy of anterior temporal lobectomy.
The scientific and payor communities typically demand randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as definitive evidence for safety and efficacy claims. However, in circumstances where the medical device has already been cleared by regulatory authorities and is readily available in the market, an RCT may not be feasible to execute. It is therefore crucial to gain acceptance by both the scientific community and regulators to design a study that will satisfy all concerned.
描述在当前实践背景下立体定向激光消融颞叶癫痫研究方案的制定过程。目前仍在探索治疗耐药性癫痫的理想方法。尽管有多种选择,但每种方法都存在挑战,这不仅使选择合适的治疗方法变得不明确,而且在设计临床研究以提供支持治疗的证据方面也存在困难。
本研究为前瞻性、单臂、多中心研究,旨在评估 Visualase MRI 引导激光消融系统治疗颞叶癫痫的安全性和有效性,最多纳入 150 例患者。主要疗效终点为术后 12 个月内无癫痫发作(定义为 Engel Ⅰ级),主要安全性终点为术后 12 个月内 qualifying device、procedure 或 anesthesia-related adverse events 的发生率。
主要终点将与前颞叶切除术的安全性和有效性的历史值进行比较。
科学界和支付方通常要求随机对照试验(RCT)作为安全性和有效性的明确证据。然而,在医疗器械已经通过监管机构批准并在市场上广泛应用的情况下,执行 RCT 可能不可行。因此,获得科学界和监管机构的认可,设计一项能满足各方需求的研究至关重要。