• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项全国性护理协调项目对降低高成本、高需求糖尿病医疗补助受益人的医疗服务利用率的评估。

Evaluation of a National Care Coordination Program to Reduce Utilization Among High-cost, High-need Medicaid Beneficiaries With Diabetes.

作者信息

Duru O Kenrik, Harwood Jessica, Moin Tannaz, Jackson Nicholas J, Ettner Susan L, Vasilyev Arseniy, Mosley David G, O'Shea Donna L, Ho Sam, Mangione Carol M

机构信息

David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA.

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System.

出版信息

Med Care. 2020 Jun;58 Suppl 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 6 1):S14-S21. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001315.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001315
PMID:32412949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10653047/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical, behavioral, and social determinants of health are each associated with high levels of emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate a care coordination program designed to provide combined "whole-person care," integrating medical, behavioral, and social support for high-cost, high-need Medicaid beneficiaries by targeting access barriers and social determinants.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Individual-level interrupted time series with a comparator group, using person-month as the unit of analysis.

SUBJECTS

A total of 42,214 UnitedHealthcare Medicaid beneficiaries (194,834 person-months) age 21 years or above with diabetes, with Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, Medicaid expansion, Supplemental Security Income without Medicare, or dual Medicaid/Medicare.

MEASURES

Our outcome measures were any hospitalizations and any ED visits in a given month. Covariates of interest included an indicator for intervention versus comparator group and indicator and spline variables measuring changes in an outcome's time trend after program enrollment.

RESULTS

Overall, 6 of the 8 examined comparisons were not statistically significant. Among Supplemental Security Income beneficiaries, we observed a larger projected decrease in ED visit risk among the intervention sample versus the comparator sample at 12 months postenrollment (difference-in-difference: -6.6%; 95% confidence interval: -11.2%, -2.1%). Among expansion beneficiaries, we observed a greater decrease in hospitalization risk among the intervention sample versus the comparator sample at 12 months postenrollment (difference-in-difference: -5.8%; 95% confidence interval: -11.4%, -0.2%).

CONCLUSION

A care coordination program designed to reduce utilization among high-cost, high-need Medicaid beneficiaries was associated with fewer ED visits and hospitalizations for patients with diabetes in selected Medicaid programs but not others.

摘要

背景

健康的医学、行为和社会决定因素均与急诊就诊和住院的高发生率相关。

目的

本研究的目的是评估一项护理协调项目,该项目旨在通过针对获取障碍和社会决定因素,为高成本、高需求的医疗补助受益人群提供综合的“全人护理”,整合医学、行为和社会支持。

研究设计

采用个体水平的间断时间序列设计,并设置一个对照组,以人月作为分析单位。

研究对象

共有42214名联合健康医疗补助计划的受益人群(194834人月),年龄在21岁及以上,患有糖尿病,领取临时援助家庭补助、符合医疗补助扩展计划、领取无医疗保险的补充保障收入,或同时享有医疗补助和医疗保险。

测量指标

我们的结局指标是特定月份内的任何住院情况和任何急诊就诊情况。感兴趣的协变量包括干预组与对照组的指标,以及测量项目入组后结局时间趋势变化的指标和样条变量。

结果

总体而言,8项检验比较中的6项无统计学意义。在领取补充保障收入的受益人群中,我们观察到干预组样本在入组后12个月时的急诊就诊风险预计比对照组样本有更大幅度的下降(差值:-6.6%;95%置信区间:-11.2%,-2.1%)。在符合医疗补助扩展计划的受益人群中,我们观察到干预组样本在入组后12个月时的住院风险比对照组样本有更大幅度的下降(差值:-5.8%;95%置信区间:-11.4%,-0.2%)。

结论

一项旨在降低高成本、高需求医疗补助受益人群医疗服务利用率的护理协调项目,在部分医疗补助计划中与糖尿病患者的急诊就诊和住院次数减少有关,但在其他计划中并非如此。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a National Care Coordination Program to Reduce Utilization Among High-cost, High-need Medicaid Beneficiaries With Diabetes.一项全国性护理协调项目对降低高成本、高需求糖尿病医疗补助受益人的医疗服务利用率的评估。
Med Care. 2020 Jun;58 Suppl 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 6 1):S14-S21. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001315.
2
Trends in Costs of Care and Utilization for Medicaid Patients With Diabetes in Accountable Care Communities.负责医疗社区中患有糖尿病的医疗补助患者的护理成本和使用趋势。
Med Care. 2020 Jun;58 Suppl 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 6 1):S40-S45. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001318.
3
Does an all-condition case management program for high-risk patients reduce health care utilization in medicaid and medicare beneficiaries with diabetes?高风险患者的全病种病例管理方案是否能降低医保和医疗补助计划中糖尿病受益人的医疗保健利用率?
J Diabetes Complications. 2019 Jun;33(6):445-450. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.12.011. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
4
Emergency department utilization among Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia and diabetes: the consequences of increasing medical complexity.医疗补助受益的精神分裂症和糖尿病患者在急诊部门的利用情况:医疗复杂性增加的后果。
Schizophr Res. 2014 Feb;152(2-3):490-7. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 28.
5
Association of a Care Coordination Model With Health Care Costs and Utilization: The Johns Hopkins Community Health Partnership (J-CHiP).以关怀协调模式对医疗成本和利用率的影响:约翰·霍普金斯社区卫生合作组织(J-CHiP)
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e184273. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4273.
6
Cost and utilization of behavioral health medications associated with rescission of an exemption for prior authorization for severe and persistent mental illness in the Vermont Medicaid Program.佛蒙特医疗补助计划中与撤销严重和持续性精神疾病预先授权豁免相关的行为健康药物的成本与使用情况。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2010 Jun;16(5):317-28. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2010.16.5.317.
7
Effects of State-level Medicaid Expansion on Veterans Health Administration Dual Enrollment and Utilization: Potential Implications for Future Coverage Expansions.州级医疗补助扩大对退伍军人事务部双重登记和使用的影响:对未来覆盖范围扩大的潜在影响。
Med Care. 2020 Jun;58(6):526-533. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001327.
8
Impact of a Medicaid primary care provider and preventive care on pediatric hospitalization.医疗补助初级保健提供者及预防保健对儿科住院治疗的影响。
Pediatrics. 1998 Mar;101(3):E1. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.3.e1.
9
Effect of Comprehensive Care Coordination on Medicaid Expenditures Compared With Usual Care Among Children and Youth With Chronic Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.综合护理协调对慢性病儿童和青少年的医疗补助支出的影响与常规护理相比:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1912604. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12604.
10
The effect of emergency department copayments for Medicaid beneficiaries following the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005.2005 年《减赤法案》实施后,对医疗补助受益人的急诊共付额的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Mar;175(3):393-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7582.

引用本文的文献

1
Can integrated care interventions strengthen primary care and improve outcomes for patients with chronic diseases? A systematic review and meta-analysis.综合护理干预能否加强初级保健并改善慢性病患者的治疗效果?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jan 6;23(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01260-1.
2
Social Risks and Health Care Use in Medically Complex Patients.医疗复杂患者的社会风险与医疗保健使用
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2435199. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.35199.
3
Use of Real-World Data in Population Science to Improve the Prevention and Care of Diabetes-Related Outcomes.利用真实世界数据改善糖尿病相关结局的预防和护理。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Jul 1;46(7):1316-1326. doi: 10.2337/dc22-1438.
4
Differential Impact of a Plan-Led Standardized Complex Care Management Intervention on Subgroups of High-Cost High-Need Medicaid Patients.计划主导的标准化综合护理管理干预对高费用高需求医疗补助患者亚组的差异化影响。
Popul Health Manag. 2023 Apr;26(2):100-106. doi: 10.1089/pop.2022.0271.
5
Racial Health Equity and Social Needs Interventions: A Review of a Scoping Review.种族健康公平与社会需求干预:一项系统评价综述。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2250654. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50654.
6
High-cost high-need patients in Medicaid: segmenting the population eligible for a national complex case management program.医疗补助计划中的高费用高需求患者:为有资格参加国家综合病例管理计划的人群进行细分。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 23;21(1):1143. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07116-6.
7
Trends in Costs of Care and Utilization for Medicaid Patients With Diabetes in Accountable Care Communities.负责医疗社区中患有糖尿病的医疗补助患者的护理成本和使用趋势。
Med Care. 2020 Jun;58 Suppl 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 6 1):S40-S45. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001318.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Costs of Care and Utilization for Medicaid Patients With Diabetes in Accountable Care Communities.负责医疗社区中患有糖尿病的医疗补助患者的护理成本和使用趋势。
Med Care. 2020 Jun;58 Suppl 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 6 1):S40-S45. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001318.
2
Association of a Care Coordination Model With Health Care Costs and Utilization: The Johns Hopkins Community Health Partnership (J-CHiP).以关怀协调模式对医疗成本和利用率的影响:约翰·霍普金斯社区卫生合作组织(J-CHiP)
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e184273. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4273.
3
Effect of Community Health Worker Support on Clinical Outcomes of Low-Income Patients Across Primary Care Facilities: A Randomized Clinical Trial.社区卫生工作者支持对初级保健机构中低收入患者临床结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1635-1643. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4630.
4
Trends in Food Insecurity in the USA for Individuals with Prediabetes, Undiagnosed Diabetes, and Diagnosed Diabetes.美国糖尿病前期、未确诊糖尿病和已确诊糖尿病患者的粮食不安全状况趋势。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jan;34(1):33-35. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4651-z.
5
The Complex Needs of Medicaid Expansion Enrollees with Very Low Incomes.低收入医疗补助扩大计划参保者的复杂需求
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2018 May 1;2018:1-10.
6
Perspectives from the Society for Pediatric Research: interventions targeting social needs in pediatric clinical care.儿科研究学会观点:儿科临床护理中针对社会需求的干预措施。
Pediatr Res. 2018 Jul;84(1):10-21. doi: 10.1038/s41390-018-0012-1. Epub 2018 May 23.
7
Going Beyond Clinical Care to Reduce Health Care Spending: Findings From the J-CHiP Community-based Population Health Management Program Evaluation.超越临床护理,降低医疗保健支出:J-CHiP 基于社区的人群健康管理计划评估结果。
Med Care. 2018 Jul;56(7):603-609. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000934.
8
Innovative Population Health Model Associated With Reduced Emergency Department Use And Inpatient Hospitalizations.创新的人口健康模式可降低急诊就诊率和住院率。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Apr;37(4):543-550. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1099.
9
Key Design Considerations When Calculating Cost Savings for Population Health Management Programs in an Observational Setting.在观察性环境中计算人群健康管理计划成本节约时的关键设计考虑因素。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):3107-3124. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12832. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
10
Introductory Overview of the Natural Experiments for Translation in Diabetes 2.0 (NEXT-D2) Network: Examining the Impact of US Health Policies and Practices to Prevent Diabetes and Its Complications.糖尿病 2.0 自然试验转化网络(NEXT-D2 网络)简介:考察美国预防糖尿病及其并发症的卫生政策和实践的影响
Curr Diab Rep. 2018 Feb 5;18(2):8. doi: 10.1007/s11892-018-0977-5.